Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3rd part of the Mexico Trip series at CTKA
#16
Drew Phipps Wrote:So what you are saying is, whoever made this reservation paid for the ticket in advance? A not uncommon practice for thrifty gringos nowadays, but perhaps then and there most people just bought the ticket when they actually arrive for the bus. If "Oswald" (or whoever) paid for it in advance (maybe in violation of instructions), then that indicates that "Oswald" (or whoever) did not expect to succeed being allowed to travel to Cuba on Sept. 30. If Oswald was convinced he was going to fail on 9/30, why wait until 10/2 to make the bus ride?

Not exactly Drew.

The reservations were made on Sept 30th at the travel agency with BARRIOS
BARRIOS - who has Mr. LEE inn front of him - takes the payment and gives Mr. LEE PO#14618 and Exchange Order 43599 which are to be given in for the actual tickets - like #13688 from Mexico City to Laredo on Del Norte

Strange thing #1 is that these two items SHOULD have been done at the same time yet one is dated Sept 30 while the other Oct 1.

At 8:15am at the Del Norte terminal in Mexico City he hands over PO#14618 and supposedly gets 3 ticket stubs for #13688 - one of which is found by Marina in Aug 1964 while the other two are found by TREVINO in an envelope for the bus #373 trip between Monterrey and Laredo.

The ticket agent in Mexico City who claims to have done this transaction ANGEL CURIEL is the man whose stamp we should see on the back of all three portions of ticket #13688. Not only does this not happen, CURIEL cannot recall Oswald from the photo and the man whose stamp does appear, JUAN GASCON says he did not recall seeing Oswald. The date of these stamps, even though it is now Oct 2nd, says Sept 30th.

There are more tickets in the Monterrey envelope than passengers. The MExico city #332 bus envelope SHOULD have this first part - they should not BOTH be in the Monterrey envelope and the date stamp on the back needs to have been at least the 2nd of Oct and with CURIEL's name.

ALL of this evidence was created after the fact - as a result conflicts will arise. This is one of those conflicts the FBI knew would not, couldnot be discovered for many years. Sprague was basically removed from HSCA cause he wanted to see all the Mexico evidence.

The CIA said no and required him to sign a secrecy oath which he would not... the rest is Blakey history.

DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply


Messages In This Thread
3rd part of the Mexico Trip series at CTKA - by David Josephs - 15-01-2015, 01:42 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part V/Conclusion Gil Jesus 0 393 05-03-2024, 02:07 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part IV / The X-Rays Gil Jesus 0 307 02-03-2024, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --Part III: The Autopsy Photos Gil Jesus 0 332 27-02-2024, 01:40 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part II / The Exit Wound Gil Jesus 0 370 14-02-2024, 01:31 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part I / The Entry Wound Gil Jesus 0 368 06-02-2024, 02:32 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 511 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 561 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 587 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Another Look at the "Backyard Photographs" --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 466 22-09-2023, 12:38 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Another Look at the "Backyard Photographs" --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 479 15-09-2023, 10:11 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)