09-02-2015, 06:24 PM
Quote:Hi Bob
You're assuming JFK was struck in the back with a conventional weapon.
That's an assumption that cannot be made.
Yeah, I guess I'm just old fashioned. However, I have looked very closely at all of the theories involving exotic non-lead projectiles doing the damage in the JFK assassination, and I have come to two conclusions about them.
1. I have yet to see any of these exotic weapons that do not have a chance of leaving some exotic projectile (or part of a projectile) behind for some curious bystander to pick up and start asking embarrassing questions about.
When did you become familiar with every weapon devised for the US Army Special Operations Division out of Ft. Detrick?
A few weeks ago you didn't appear to have any knowledge of these weapons -- now you're an expert?
2. You can't beat a high speed lead bullet for efficiency in killing, and the mess this bullet leaves behind makes the resulting death very believable to the public.
Or unless the first shot misses and the subject ducks for cover. Then what?
If JFK had died, and the only wounds visible were a tiny hole in the neck and a "shallow" wound in the back, how long would it take for reporters to start speculating about exotic CIA based toxins as the cause of death?
It would have taken 12 years. It wasn't until 1975 that any reporters knew about these weapons. And even then, what mainstream reporters were all that aggressive about JFK murder inquiries?
[/QUOTE]