11-02-2015, 10:52 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Cliff Varnell Wrote:No, we don't need to dig up JFK.
The bullet holes in the clothes correspond to the T3 back wound
How is it that so many people can spend most of their lives wearing clothing and yet be completely unaware of how their clothing moves?
I have a similar fixation with the brain evidence.
Let's dig up JFK anyway.
Hey Cliff, look! There's an elephant hanging over a cliff with its tail tied to a daisy!
.
Digging up JFK might satisfy several hundred JFK head wound/s obsessives.
But the FBI reference to "apparent" pre-autopsy surgery to the top of the head means we can't know for sure how many times JFK was struck in the head even if he were exhumed.
How many head shots? One? Two? Three?
What a colossal rabbit hole!
The evidence of the low back wound and the throat entrance are far more clear-cut.
The shot in the back didn't transit.
The frontal throat shot didn't transit.
No bullets were recovered from those locations during the autopsy.
Those are the root facts of the murder of JFK.
A study of the head wound/s is a study of the cover-up.
A study of Oswald is a study of the cover-up.
A study of the back/throat wounds is a study of the murder itself.
It is a common assumption that the people who handled Oswald were the same people who actually murdered JFK -- which over-looks the possibility Oswald's various handlers were themselves groomed for potential patsy-hood.
What happened to the bullets that hit JFK's back and throat?
There seems to be an entire generation of JFK Critical Researchers awfully reluctant to address that crucial question...