Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Respect" for the clothing evidence?
#24
Albert Doyle Wrote:
Cliff Varnell Wrote:Digging up JFK might satisfy several hundred JFK head wound/s obsessives.

But the FBI reference to "apparent" pre-autopsy surgery to the top of the head means we can't know for sure how many times JFK was struck in the head even if he were exhumed.


I'm not sure that's true Cliff. I think you under-rate modern forensic technology there a little.

Maybe. You *do* realize that such a thing can never happen, right?

No one is going to dig up JFK, man.



Plus we could see the true final status of all the head wounds and attempts to alter them. As for the head wounds the true total forensic analysis the original plotters were trying to hide with their conspiracy could finally be done.

Good luck with that...


Cliff Varnell Wrote:How many head shots? One? Two? Three?

What a colossal rabbit hole!


Just the opposite man. Once modern high tech found any evidence of a second shot, or shot other than the official one, that re-opens the case.


There has always been prima facie low tech proof of a second shooter.

The bullet holes in the clothes are too low to be associated with the throat wound.

Even when Gaeton Fonzi destroyed the SBT to Arlen Specter's face it sure as hell didn't reopen the case.




Cliff Varnell Wrote:A study of the back/throat wounds is a study of the murder itself.



Which an exhumation would only help prove.


Quixotic, that one.




Cliff Varnell Wrote:It is a common assumption that the people who handled Oswald were the same people who actually murdered JFK -- which over-looks the possibility Oswald's various handlers were themselves groomed for potential patsy-hood.




Legally, once they helped cover it up they were.


They were accessories.

What did Oswald's handlers need to know about the who and how of JFK's murder?

What they needed to know was all they knew, and I'd submit they didn't need to know much.






Cliff Varnell Wrote:What happened to the bullets that hit JFK's back and throat?

There seems to be an entire generation of JFK Critical Researchers awfully reluctant to address that crucial question...



And I'm not one of them. Perhaps a covert pre-autopsy either in the forward cargo compartment or at Bethesda - or both. An issue an exhumation would only help answer.

Why pine for evidence you'll never see when there's plenty of evidence you're not even considering?

http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church...nseney.pdf

http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church..._Colby.pdf

The doctors the night of the autopsy seriously considered the possibility JFK was struck with a high tech weapon, which points to the US Army Special Operations Division, Ft. Detrick, Maryland, specifically the "Staff Support Group," which was a CIA operation staffed with military officers who used high tech weaponry which wouldn't show up in an autopsy.

You'll never get leads like that out of the head wound/s evidence.
1
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"Respect" for the clothing evidence? - by Cliff Varnell - 12-02-2015, 09:10 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum Brian Doyle 4 638 29-11-2024, 12:44 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Fiber Evidence Gil Jesus 0 276 10-06-2024, 11:49 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part V/Conclusion Gil Jesus 0 397 05-03-2024, 02:07 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part IV / The X-Rays Gil Jesus 0 314 02-03-2024, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --Part III: The Autopsy Photos Gil Jesus 0 337 27-02-2024, 01:40 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part II / The Exit Wound Gil Jesus 0 376 14-02-2024, 01:31 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part I / The Entry Wound Gil Jesus 0 375 06-02-2024, 02:32 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  NO Evidence Gil Jesus 3 1,161 31-07-2023, 03:44 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 649 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Detailed discussion and analysis of the H&L evidence David Josephs 105 299,438 24-08-2020, 03:26 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)