Crossing the Evidence Chasm

[Jim Hargrove]

[....]

The person with the best talent on these kind of things is probably DiEugenio. I think if he went after it he could really concisely detail the evidence. The reason I focus on this in Varnell-type fashion is because it is strictly irrefutable and simple. It comes from their own evidence, and can be shown easily without any wiggle room. This is case-cracking proof of conspiracy (If the numerous other examples weren't enough already).

I'm way out of my league here on the medical evidence, but the detailed response is appreciated.

What I was hoping to put together, though, were pieces of evidence that, in a very brief look, are likely to be seen by average people as clearly falsified. If we had the visual evidence you refer to, this might be a powerful argument. Without that evidence, the argument relies on memories and descriptions such as you've provided, the very type of thing propagandists work endlessly to distort.