17-04-2015, 02:18 PM
I've read it. I am thinking that there is no discernible difference, with John's proof and evidence in that book, between an actual double, as opposed to a plausible legend created for Oswald to "explain" his defection and subsequent activities, in the event the Soviets, or someone else, started to look for his records; and in my mind at least, the legend possibility is far more likely.
However, there is no doubt in my mind that someone, from time to time, impersonated Oswald, beginning in 1958 (?) while he was in Russia.
However, there is no doubt in my mind that someone, from time to time, impersonated Oswald, beginning in 1958 (?) while he was in Russia.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."