No Lead Necessary

[Bob Prudhomme]

Frazier explicitly stated that the scope when received in his laboratory was adjusted to hit without leading the moving target. Perhaps this is the reason why they then preceded to screw around with the scope adjustments to produce misleading sighting errors.

Second, the curvature of the road did not cause to moving target to move from left of right in the scope's of field view. Instead a straight road would produce this observed effect since the target was moving away from the shooter.

Frazier explicitly stated a lot of things. Unfortunately for him, when you put all of these things next to each other, he contradicts himself on a regular basis.

P.S. No one purposely adjusts a scope so that it will hit without leading the target. The scope shot high and to the right for several reasons; chief among them being it was adjusted as far as it would go and was still off target.

I noted that you fail to distinguish a stationary target that showed the rifle shot high and to the right from a moving target whose motion made leading the target unnecessary.

Your reading of Frazier as confused does not diminish his lucid statement. Period. He found and reported evidence that strongly suggested that the shooter had foreknowledge of the speed and direction of the limousine at a particular portion of Elm Street.

Now are you going to argue that a FBI agent made up this evidence of conspiracy and the WC did nothing to prevent publication of this shocking claim?

Herbert, this discussion ends here. I refuse to discuss a topic with someone as lost as you are, and I have for years been highly suspect of your motives.