Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
More BS: an alternative to the NIST fairytale
#5
Drew Phipps Wrote:Steam explosions (where water comes into contact with anything super hot) probably wouldn't have enough energy to seriously affect concrete reinforced steel columns. IMHO have at best extremely localized effects.


The kind of explosion where aluminum oxidizes quickly in the presence of water releases more energy (because it includes chemical energy) but would leave aluminum oxide residue everywhere. Anyone remember if the WTC dust contained a signifigant amount of aluminum oxide? Also IMHO you would basically need vaporized molten aluminum to interact quickly with the water, which certainly seems possible during a high energy collision but wouldn't stick around very long. Certainly not for an hour or so. The aluminum would quickly cool from a vaporized state.

Also, I'm guessing the fact that you can watch the molten whatever it is drip out of the building and fall thru the air (containing oxygen) without some sort of additional pyrotechnic display means that the molten metal isn't aluminum, or for whatever reason it isn't oxidizing quickly enough to do any real damage aside from the heat.

In the interests of fairness, I should add to this that the explosions posited by the program come from the contact with water of the molten aluminium, and are a property of the aluminium, not from the rapid expansion of the water into steam. I have heard stories (before 9/11, I should add) about explosions caused by aluminium. I had a customer whose steel mill was very badly damaged because a coke can got discarded into a container of steel about to be smelted.

The standard MO was all there though in this program. Take a particular, narrow element of the whole picture, and make a case that is barely plausible, throw in some emotional blackmail about doubting the official story being an insult to the memories of those who died, and voila! We have a blatant attempt to prop up the official lie.

They did give a small amount of time to Richard Gage of Architects for 9/11 truth, but nothing like the time given to the main proponents, and neither did Gage get an opportunity to rebut their ideas.

The film makers apparently approached the Port Authority to test the remnants of the steel from the WTC to test for aluminium deposits. However their request was refused. No mention of the fact that the steel was cleared away and sent to China for recycling!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
More BS: an alternative to the NIST fairytale - by Martin White - 04-11-2014, 10:13 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  20th Annaversary of the fairytale of Big Lies Peter Lemkin 38 11,609 28-09-2021, 05:52 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Great New 911 Film - NIST insider speaks out about the obvious lies. Peter Lemkin 0 4,330 14-03-2017, 07:25 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  NIST overlooked NSA's cryptography 'back door' Peter Lemkin 0 3,027 28-11-2014, 08:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Tony Szamboti's 25 Points of Contention with NIST Lauren Johnson 0 3,455 08-11-2014, 06:36 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Tony Szamboti on NIST Lauren Johnson 0 2,650 08-11-2014, 06:36 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Prelude To A Lawsuit Against NIST?! Peter Lemkin 4 4,252 04-03-2014, 03:01 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 3,638 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Int'l Center for 9/11 Studies - NIST Cumulus Video Database Released Ed Jewett 10 6,939 09-11-2010, 09:54 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  NIST photos and videos released Ed Jewett 2 3,897 02-09-2010, 08:55 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  NIST Denies Access to WTC7 Data Ed Jewett 3 3,729 14-07-2010, 03:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)