12-11-2019, 11:42 PM
David Andrews Wrote:Sorry -- didn't notice the pre-2001 pub date on the Coulson book. Don't know what to tell you on the lie.
The Richard Jewell thing was one of their stupidest moves. If they didn't have some unfathomable tactical reason for making that accusation, I don't know how they thought they were going to make that stick against that poor guy, based on the evidence reported.
The pre-2001 pub date makes it all the more interesting, doesn't it? Surely Danny Coulson had to have asked John O'Neill if he could do that. So at least their stories would match up. Which of course implies they knew one another well enough that Coulson knew John would say "sure Doc, go for it, I've got not problem with that."
And I suspect that Jewell thing was 100% politics. It was some ultra-liberal Clinton worshiping politically correct blowhard at FBI HQ who really, really wanted the white middle aged guy to be the bomber...
email: rbooth@protonmail.com
My OKC articles: https://medium.com/@rboothokc
My OKC video clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLZ5LDp...hvlmET4OxQ
My OKC documents: https://libertarianinstitute.org/okc/
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
--Winston Churchill
My OKC articles: https://medium.com/@rboothokc
My OKC video clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLZ5LDp...hvlmET4OxQ
My OKC documents: https://libertarianinstitute.org/okc/
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
--Winston Churchill