23-01-2016, 11:09 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Scott,
I don't want to insult you but you should be very careful offering that recklessly superficial view of Dulles in this room. It is somewhat conspicuously lacking in the necessary understanding of who and what Dulles was as well as his methods and interests. While I haven't read Devil's Chessboard I've read enough excerpts and discussions to get a good idea that you would be well advised to read that book and absorb its content before floating such a wildly irresponsible and blindly unseeking claim. You are well into Trejo territory here and walking on extremely thin ice as far as research credibility in my opinion. If one were to flirt with Mastermind labels outside of the Drago model it would be very tempting to designate Dulles as that person he is so drenched in evidence of guilt. So you should reconsider your ill-advised defense of him.
I think you might have serious evidence in your address book niche. You should be more protective of it by not risking your credibility with such claims. Anyone who downplays Dulles's motives is foolhardy in my opinion and not paying attention to some of the most serious avenues of the assassination and the players involved. Dulles is a very illuminated individual and embodiment of old school Intel order whose reach is not always directly apparent but whose results are and therefore evidence his role.
No worries, pretty hard to insult intelligence.