Is This The Long Awaited Pandemic?

[Ed Jewett]

I just discovered this archive of stuff over at Cryptome.

I have not read this at all. I'll just post the links:

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz2.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz3.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz4.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz5.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz6.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz7.htm

http://cryptome.org/h1n1/cdc-flu-fuzz8.htm

The person who “sends” this stuff (it is his analysis) is James Atkinson, current address and Phone # and web site and e-mail provided, and he is

ATKINSON JAMES M

• Assn. Former Intelligence Officers. Membership Directory. 1996
  
• Intelligence (Paris) 1997-09-08 (10)
  

If you google his name, you will also find extended Congressional testimony
Before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
U.S. Coast Guard Budget and Oversight Hearing, April 18, 2007

I have only begin to review this stuff but, if I get the gist of it, he is suggesting that the CDC is to be found guilty of “fuzzing” the data on the H1N1 flu outbreak by failing to report its severity.

I will continue to look into this as I have the time (though I will be out a good deal of Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday this week).

Here's my question:

This material seems to run against much of the material I've seen about the flu/CDC/BigPharma debate, which tends along the lines of "the prospects of pandemic -- as well as the flu itself -- is 'man-made', and the vaccines are at least untested and full of squalene and other unknown junk" in which the CDC and WHO are made to be hyperventilating the threat so as to drive vaccination, purchase of vaccines, and other issues of mass public health management... whereas this material from Atkinson apparently says that the CDC is suppressing information about the severity of the matter. And this stuff is sent in by a former "spook".

Not all former spooks are bad guys, and I don't really have a feel for Crypytome yet. Given the fact that I am so out front and visible on this issue, I'd like to have some sense of WTFIGOH. Something in this mix is either wrong, or is disinformation. If this fellow Atkinson is right, then the implications are indeed horrifying; it would be a classic Cannae attack using both the disease and the cure.

All further discussion and insight is welcome and, given the gravity of the issues, desired.