Methodical Deception - 911 Very Interesting Inside The Airline Persective

[David Guyatt]

I cannot "debunk" the video's premise, but I have one observation to make. It appears to me that the initial object trailing smoke and moving more or less horizontally, actually strikes another piece of debris (which seems to be rotating) and which is moving more or less vertically. The rotating falling debris is visible above the "smoking girder" and appears to intersect it. Since this apparent intersection occurs not merely from one perspective, but at least 2 (that are in that clip), I believe that it is reasonable to conclude that the two objects actually collided, which would change the trajectory of both pieces, depending on their relative masses.

I have no knowledge about whether girders painted with unexploded nanothermite would emit white or black smoke, or even that nanothermite (which I assumed burned very quickly) would burn slow enough to continue burning for a period of time long enough for that girder to leave the building.

The reaction time of nanothermite is very rapid. The reaction product is Aluminum oxide [in nanothermite it would be nano-sized Aluminum oxide, which is a light white powder - which behaves exactly as seen in these and other images. It was also found in large amounts [along with un-reacted nanothermite] in the rubble piles and in the dust that engulfed lower Manhattan.

None of the towers collapsed - they were exploded. All of them...but the most spectacular explosive events were the two big towers - the physics of which do not allow gravity to be the only energy source - and that is clearly visible to the eye as well - great portions are blown upward and outward and a pyroclastic cloud is formed. The official fiction is not consistent with the laws of the Universe and Physics - they only comport with the propaganda wishes of the conspirators.

If this was all pre-planned, then there is no hope for us. If the Kennedy assassination was pre-planned, then there is no hope for us. If thinking about thinking about all of this was pre-planned, then……….. it's your Guessing Game. Our move.

I disagree with your conclusion, Mark. There is hope. The hope has to be that more and more people un-hook themselves from the daily propaganda feed and begin to see the world through the lens of their critical thinking ability. They'll stop thinking that it's impossible that something as big as 9/11 couldn't and wouldn't be carried out.

It was Goebbels who proclaimed that:

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Take this with PNAC's 2000 paper on Rebuilding America's Defences --- and scrub the word "defences" and replace it with "pre-emption" and the observation that for this to happen:

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor. ..."

Therefore, it is equally likely that for the process of transformation of revolutionary change to happen to turn us back to a state of critical thinking is likely to be a long one. But it needs to happen. And I believe it will happen.

It's just that at the present time most of us are happily sleep walking.