31-10-2015, 01:01 PM
At this point, don't we have the right, if not the duty, to be suspicious of "new" evidence? What if folks just blindly accept that video and then someone proves it's a forgery? It would tend to discredit a whole generation of 9/11 skeptics.
I know about the eyewitnesses; this is not about them. I need to hear more on the provenance of that video clip before I accept it at face value.
I know about the eyewitnesses; this is not about them. I need to hear more on the provenance of that video clip before I accept it at face value.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."