04-10-2019, 06:49 AM
I don't think you're really paying attention. TrineDay published a book in which, during the editing process, they:
1) Left out a paragraph on a page---something that was not missing in what was sent to them
2) Left out an entire section of end notes--something that was not missing in what was sent to them
3) Left out an entire page--something that was not missing in what was sent to them
Make as many excuses as you want, and blow your own horn over your own book as much as you want, it makes little difference to the bottom line. And that bottom line is that the publisher made egregious unprofessional mistakes in which there are no excuses for.
Which, by the way, the publisher--unlike yourself--acknowledged these issues. Additionally, I would add to TrineDay's credit that these sorts of mistakes don't happen with every book that they publish, which is about the only credible thing to have been said about TrineDay in their defense. It is my understanding that the person who did the editing on that book was let go.
But keep defending the indefensible, I'm sure it will let the objective observer know a thing or two about your judgement.
I'm not going to comment to you any further on this issue. It's a waste of my time, and based on what I see in your responses it appears you just want to argue, and to talk about your own book.
--Richard
1) Left out a paragraph on a page---something that was not missing in what was sent to them
2) Left out an entire section of end notes--something that was not missing in what was sent to them
3) Left out an entire page--something that was not missing in what was sent to them
Make as many excuses as you want, and blow your own horn over your own book as much as you want, it makes little difference to the bottom line. And that bottom line is that the publisher made egregious unprofessional mistakes in which there are no excuses for.
Which, by the way, the publisher--unlike yourself--acknowledged these issues. Additionally, I would add to TrineDay's credit that these sorts of mistakes don't happen with every book that they publish, which is about the only credible thing to have been said about TrineDay in their defense. It is my understanding that the person who did the editing on that book was let go.
But keep defending the indefensible, I'm sure it will let the objective observer know a thing or two about your judgement.
I'm not going to comment to you any further on this issue. It's a waste of my time, and based on what I see in your responses it appears you just want to argue, and to talk about your own book.
--Richard
email: rbooth@protonmail.com
My OKC articles: https://medium.com/@rboothokc
My OKC video clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLZ5LDp...hvlmET4OxQ
My OKC documents: https://libertarianinstitute.org/okc/
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
--Winston Churchill
My OKC articles: https://medium.com/@rboothokc
My OKC video clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLZ5LDp...hvlmET4OxQ
My OKC documents: https://libertarianinstitute.org/okc/
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
--Winston Churchill