Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
7/7 Inquest shows official narrative falling apart at seams
#23
Paul Rigby Wrote:...a patsy to a piece of deep state terrorism

Quote:Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The Identification of Mohammed Sidique Khan

Week 7 of the 7/7 Inquests drew to a close with the revelations of how Mohammed Sidique Khan was identified on Circle Line train 216 at Edgware Road.

In much the same way as Shehzad Tanweer apparently all but 'disintegrated' on the Aldgate train a similar story emerged in relation to Khan.

Apart from Danny Biddle, whose testimony we analysed here, none of the 23 passengers from carriage 2, that gave testimony or had statements read to the Inquests, mentioned seeing Khan. Despite many having been on the train for the five stops between King's Cross and Edgware Road, Khan wasn't seen. Nor was there any mention of an Asian man wearing a white baseball cap sitting in seat 27.

The Inquests were shown a diagram of the probable positions of passengers before the explosion which strangely has Khan sitting alone in a bank of four seats:

http://77inquests.blogspot.com/2010/11/i...-khan.html
Paul - all

I had quite a little spat with Bridget Dunne on Nick Kollerstrom's blog here a couple of weeks ago. It made me take care in preparing a comment for the piece you excerpt above, the burden of which was that, in spite of our spat, to thank her for her impressive analysis and to ask if she agreed that it had finally tipped the balance of probability in favour of the explosions having been caused by something other than "4 suicide bombers" for her.

When I came to post the comment I found I wasn't signed in to blogger so, without thinking, I auto-signed in though my own blog on another tab then refreshed the comment page tab. BANG ! - carefully prepared comment vanished. Couldn't summon the energy to redo it.

It's a long post but anyone reading it all - together with several other analyses of the earlier Inquest evidence sessions on both the J7 and NK's blogs can be left in little if any doubt that there were no suicide bombers in London on 7 July 2005; Patsies? - maybe - determined homegrown murderous suicide bombers? With similar probabilitiy to the moon being made of green cheese.

The diagrams supplied by the Met; the data from London Transport automated reporting systems; the evidence about operational and personal phones; consistent evidence about the number of dead bodies at each location from both the police and others - and a host of other damning details really do blow the official narrative away.

It is little wonder that our shiny new Coalition are furiously backpedaling in their pre-election commitment to a proper inquiry. It's pretty clear that they will have very serious problems fixing even a "Proper" Inquiry.
Peter Presland

".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
7/7 Inquest shows official narrative falling apart at seams - by Peter Presland - 04-12-2010, 11:32 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can't fool the First Responders! NYCFD calls for new investigation - says 'official' one wrong! Peter Lemkin 2 3,518 31-07-2019, 05:23 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Questions about the official version of 9-11-01 Peter Lemkin 13 33,328 08-05-2018, 06:53 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  LOOSE CHANGE 2ND EDITION (HD 2017 remaster) - full official Youtube release. Anthony Thorne 1 5,330 06-09-2017, 12:15 AM
Last Post: Anthony Thorne
  The Bin Laden Death Mythology - Official History of the Raid Camouflages US Protection of.... David Guyatt 1 3,195 11-09-2016, 09:48 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Importance of the Official 9/11 Myth to the perpetrators and researchers - both! Peter Lemkin 0 5,643 06-11-2015, 08:05 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The Moral Decoding of 9-11. The Official Conspiracy Theory, the Free Press, and the 9-11 Turn Paul Rigby 0 3,751 01-10-2015, 10:40 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  Its Official~! Believe in 9-11 Truth?; 50% Chance FBI Rates You A Terrorist! Peter Lemkin 11 6,561 22-10-2013, 10:00 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The KEY to unlocking the 'official lie' of 9-11-01 is there was TOO MUCH ENERGY INVOLVED! Peter Lemkin 28 19,693 06-10-2013, 06:41 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  The Facts Speak For Themselves - And Do NOT Support the Official Version! Peter Lemkin 0 4,046 23-07-2013, 11:48 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Remembered The Falling Man; Bernice Moore 0 2,185 31-08-2011, 03:19 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)