13-05-2012, 08:29 PM
Charles, please keep the deep political pornography to a minimum
:jawdrop:. Lancer has done some good things...and they have also divided the research community [though it was already divided, and didn't need any further such!]. However, some very good people and good researchers have for one reason or another aligned themselves with Lancer for book deals, speaking, et al....so let us not cast the net too widely. I was shocked when I heard DC had seemingly endorsed the Fixed-Floor Mausoleum's idea of a private party in and around DP on the 50th - those that don't support the WC need not attend, as you won't be admitted - no matter how you dress or how you act....with police enforcement, I'm sure with pleasure. The above apologia / explanation was, to my way of thinking, VERY weak and very half [quarter? eighth?]-hearted. While DC said she'd be holding forth, spreading the word of conspiracy and 'don't believe the official version' from some tiny tuft of grass not under the Pope's and the Police's control [for the city fathers and protectors of Dallas' good image and the secrets of the past], I heard no condemnation of Dunkel and Co. plan. I'm just one small step away from joining in on the condemnation wholesale. Lancer's raison d'etre and modus operandi have always been a tad suspect....but I have been gracious and always given a small degree of leeway and let it slide. I think unless a much more clear and forthright condemnation of the plans for the 50th in Dallas [DP in particular] and Lancer's dissociation from it en toto, I too will join the bruh ha ha...... DC, your moment is now...to explain if you have been a bit naive or complicit. Which is it? Nothing personal...it just happens to involve a coup my country was overthrown in - and the coup leader's heirs still firmly in control! It goes beyond personalities - but, yes, we make our decisions of how to act, think and who to affiliate with one at a time. In this case, I think an act of disaffiliation would be in order.....or your 'rep' and Lancer's name will be in the mud. IMHO. :wirlitzer:
I'm bending over backwards to give you and Lancer one chance more....before I make my mind up once and for all. Again, many good people have been and are affiliated and should be taken on a case by case basis....and not considered as one. See my call [twice, I believe] on this Forum for an 'Occupy'-like event by the PEOPLE on the 50th to stop Dunkel, the Mausoleum, and the City Fraudsters standing in proxy for the Nation ones.
:jawdrop:. Lancer has done some good things...and they have also divided the research community [though it was already divided, and didn't need any further such!]. However, some very good people and good researchers have for one reason or another aligned themselves with Lancer for book deals, speaking, et al....so let us not cast the net too widely. I was shocked when I heard DC had seemingly endorsed the Fixed-Floor Mausoleum's idea of a private party in and around DP on the 50th - those that don't support the WC need not attend, as you won't be admitted - no matter how you dress or how you act....with police enforcement, I'm sure with pleasure. The above apologia / explanation was, to my way of thinking, VERY weak and very half [quarter? eighth?]-hearted. While DC said she'd be holding forth, spreading the word of conspiracy and 'don't believe the official version' from some tiny tuft of grass not under the Pope's and the Police's control [for the city fathers and protectors of Dallas' good image and the secrets of the past], I heard no condemnation of Dunkel and Co. plan. I'm just one small step away from joining in on the condemnation wholesale. Lancer's raison d'etre and modus operandi have always been a tad suspect....but I have been gracious and always given a small degree of leeway and let it slide. I think unless a much more clear and forthright condemnation of the plans for the 50th in Dallas [DP in particular] and Lancer's dissociation from it en toto, I too will join the bruh ha ha...... DC, your moment is now...to explain if you have been a bit naive or complicit. Which is it? Nothing personal...it just happens to involve a coup my country was overthrown in - and the coup leader's heirs still firmly in control! It goes beyond personalities - but, yes, we make our decisions of how to act, think and who to affiliate with one at a time. In this case, I think an act of disaffiliation would be in order.....or your 'rep' and Lancer's name will be in the mud. IMHO. :wirlitzer:
I'm bending over backwards to give you and Lancer one chance more....before I make my mind up once and for all. Again, many good people have been and are affiliated and should be taken on a case by case basis....and not considered as one. See my call [twice, I believe] on this Forum for an 'Occupy'-like event by the PEOPLE on the 50th to stop Dunkel, the Mausoleum, and the City Fraudsters standing in proxy for the Nation ones.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass