06-08-2015, 11:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2015, 11:53 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Somebody is getting away with Amazon trolling while posing as being offended.
It amazes me that persons who would stoop so low would speak of decency. Especially ones that attack some of the worst victims of the assassination.
The on-topic discussion of Janney is in the thread above. Unfortunately it has been hijacked by an unraveled poster.
Scully has to learn how to argue evidence. Lack of blood and gunpowder trumps any kind of nitpicking he offers on Janney's version of Mitchell. If you read Scully's attack on Janney he focuses solely on his defense of Mitchell but then ignores the plethora of evidence that backs Janney throughout the case. Janney may have been wrong about Mitchell being the shooter but he's not wrong about him being an intel spook involved in the frame-up. You can see the methods Scully employs to get around having to answer this above.
Scully spends most of his efforts defending the government in CIA assassinations. Decency???
It amazes me that persons who would stoop so low would speak of decency. Especially ones that attack some of the worst victims of the assassination.
The on-topic discussion of Janney is in the thread above. Unfortunately it has been hijacked by an unraveled poster.
Scully has to learn how to argue evidence. Lack of blood and gunpowder trumps any kind of nitpicking he offers on Janney's version of Mitchell. If you read Scully's attack on Janney he focuses solely on his defense of Mitchell but then ignores the plethora of evidence that backs Janney throughout the case. Janney may have been wrong about Mitchell being the shooter but he's not wrong about him being an intel spook involved in the frame-up. You can see the methods Scully employs to get around having to answer this above.
Scully spends most of his efforts defending the government in CIA assassinations. Decency???