08-08-2015, 12:18 AM
A completely false analogy if I ever saw one.
There was absolutely no evidence at all that Crump was anything like Sirhan.
If you are saying that then you are even going a step beyond Janney's fruity book. Because he say nothing about hypnoprogramming .
Crump acted like a guilty man, all the way. Why did he act that way if he was not?
Was he guilty? I don't know for sure, but I lean today toward that conclusion.
BTW, if you want to read something funny, you should read Janney's lawsuit. Tom had it.
Mitchell was not hustled out of town at all. Tom Scully found him with ease and filled in his history. That makes Janney a poor investigator, not a layer of mystery to Mitchell.
There was absolutely no evidence at all that Crump was anything like Sirhan.
If you are saying that then you are even going a step beyond Janney's fruity book. Because he say nothing about hypnoprogramming .
Crump acted like a guilty man, all the way. Why did he act that way if he was not?
Was he guilty? I don't know for sure, but I lean today toward that conclusion.
BTW, if you want to read something funny, you should read Janney's lawsuit. Tom had it.
Mitchell was not hustled out of town at all. Tom Scully found him with ease and filled in his history. That makes Janney a poor investigator, not a layer of mystery to Mitchell.