13-10-2015, 04:00 PM
Tom Scully Wrote:If you cannot locate your wallet or the remote for your tee vee, do you jump to a conlcusion the CIA must be behind the disappearance? You react to incomplete information as if
it was complete enough to draw reliable conclusions, you do it habitually, and your results speak for themselves, as do Janney's "work".
Discredited, unfounded, contradicted by the known evidence, and I've proven that "missing" status is actually supporting evidence of nothing. Note the arrogance and what it took to demolish it.:
In my opinion it would be research negligence to ignore all the serious red flags Janney credibly pointed out like serious Intel association such as Angleton and his interest in the diary, Mitchell lying about the funding for his England hiatus, the CIA friends and family members who knew it was Mary before the cops had identified the body, Mr Janney pretending he hadn't known, the CIA insiders who said it was well-known Mary Meyer was one of their jobs, the missing fiber evidence, Joe Shimon, and Wiggins saying he felt like he was set-up. You offer a Parker-like over narration in order to avoid the more incriminating evidence. I find it weird that you would have no hesitation or fear in denying one of the worst victims of the assassination her due cause.
The car disappeared without a trace because it was a CIA set-up prop that had to be in that specific place at that specific time and couldn't be patsied because of its precise role.
I feel Tom was given a Lord's silverware set as far as reference ability, however it was missing a few knives as far as detective skill.