27-06-2012, 04:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-06-2012, 04:36 PM by Jim DiEugenio.)
Albert:
C'mon. Did you read Lisa's article?
They somehow matched his clothes THAT MORNING!
What, did they have a guy standing outside of Penney's with a walkie talkie? Getting the approximate size and then going in to buy the stuff?
And then what about the problem of Crump's race? Why would you have someone white killing Mary when Crump is black? So you have an exquisite, commando raid a la the Mossad, but you forgot that key point. Sort of like this: "Oh, get these clothes since he has this stuff on." Five minutes later. "Oh shit, he's black!"
So what does the farceur Janney now do? Realizing he has a problem, he now proposes two--not one--possible solutions. Michael Jackson like, the CIA can alter skin pigmentation (apparently instantaneously.) Or there is a stand in who is black on the scene. I am not kidding. See for yourself on pages 332-35. Except for the latter, as Lisa points out in her essay, Janney has to cheat in his arithmetic.
Janney is stuck with the white guy Mitchell. So therefore he cannot be logical with his own assumptions. Namely, if this really was a precision commando team, they would have imported someone who was black that morning.
Even on its own terms, which I do not accept at all, its all a flight of fantasy.
But its even worse than that, because as I am going to show, there was no reason for the CIA to do this to her. Janney does not prove with any credible evidence that Mary Meyer A.) Was really guiding JFK to his world wide detente scheme, or B.) Had become a critic of the Warren Commission the equivalent of say Vincent Salandria. Concerning the latter, the report was issued on 9/28, she was killed about two weeks later. There are over 6, 000 footnotes in the report. Almost all of them are to the volumes. Yet, Mary Meyer, WITHOUT THE VOLUMES AT HAND, was breaking down the WR?
Give me a break. It took months for Salandria to do that.
I mean did anyone actually read this book? Or the footnotes?
C'mon. Did you read Lisa's article?
They somehow matched his clothes THAT MORNING!
What, did they have a guy standing outside of Penney's with a walkie talkie? Getting the approximate size and then going in to buy the stuff?
And then what about the problem of Crump's race? Why would you have someone white killing Mary when Crump is black? So you have an exquisite, commando raid a la the Mossad, but you forgot that key point. Sort of like this: "Oh, get these clothes since he has this stuff on." Five minutes later. "Oh shit, he's black!"
So what does the farceur Janney now do? Realizing he has a problem, he now proposes two--not one--possible solutions. Michael Jackson like, the CIA can alter skin pigmentation (apparently instantaneously.) Or there is a stand in who is black on the scene. I am not kidding. See for yourself on pages 332-35. Except for the latter, as Lisa points out in her essay, Janney has to cheat in his arithmetic.
Janney is stuck with the white guy Mitchell. So therefore he cannot be logical with his own assumptions. Namely, if this really was a precision commando team, they would have imported someone who was black that morning.
Even on its own terms, which I do not accept at all, its all a flight of fantasy.
But its even worse than that, because as I am going to show, there was no reason for the CIA to do this to her. Janney does not prove with any credible evidence that Mary Meyer A.) Was really guiding JFK to his world wide detente scheme, or B.) Had become a critic of the Warren Commission the equivalent of say Vincent Salandria. Concerning the latter, the report was issued on 9/28, she was killed about two weeks later. There are over 6, 000 footnotes in the report. Almost all of them are to the volumes. Yet, Mary Meyer, WITHOUT THE VOLUMES AT HAND, was breaking down the WR?
Give me a break. It took months for Salandria to do that.
I mean did anyone actually read this book? Or the footnotes?