07-07-2012, 01:36 AM
Janney's reply is just about worthless.
I was very surprised at how personal his tone was. I mean did he think no one was going to take him to task for that sloppiness of method?
The only point he brings up that he is probably right on is that he did mention Crump's prior record. If that is correct, then we will change the essay.
I love what he says about the safe house. Oh it was certified by three sources. Yep, a CIA safehouse that returns letters from journalists. Happens all the time.
And ALbert is right, he never really confronts the matter of timing.
As per the lack of direct evidence, well, Peter, why not mention the guy was soaking wet when he was discovered hiding near the culvert. Maybe that is how he got rid of the nitrates.
I was very surprised at how personal his tone was. I mean did he think no one was going to take him to task for that sloppiness of method?
The only point he brings up that he is probably right on is that he did mention Crump's prior record. If that is correct, then we will change the essay.
I love what he says about the safe house. Oh it was certified by three sources. Yep, a CIA safehouse that returns letters from journalists. Happens all the time.
And ALbert is right, he never really confronts the matter of timing.
As per the lack of direct evidence, well, Peter, why not mention the guy was soaking wet when he was discovered hiding near the culvert. Maybe that is how he got rid of the nitrates.