21-07-2012, 07:09 PM
Charles:
I don' t understand the logic of the first statement.
Most of us know what happened to JFK. In fact, I actually think I can detail the operation with plentiful evidence. So to somehow compare Waldron with Janney and then say well because Janney might be wrong, that does not mean there was not a conspiracy to kill Mary Meyer, this does not follow logically. Because there is no credible evidence for an alternative theory in that case.
And as I said, one of the worst things about Janney's book is his navigating between the JFK case and the Mary Meyer case so as to set up some kind of comparison between the two, when in reality, there is none. But evidently this has worked on you.
As per your comment on the "spotters", see this is just what I meant by the ending of my essay. If we are to have any credibility as an alternative source of information, then we have to have standards. You cannot just say, "oh the joggers were there as so and so". No. Doesn't fly since there is no credible evidence for that. As I said, its Alex Jones stuff. And I am, in some ways, as opposed to him as I am to the MSM. His is a different method for going to Hades in a hand cart.
As for Albert, he failed to understand not only what I said, but what Janney said. So I won't reply to him anymore about this matter.
I don' t understand the logic of the first statement.
Most of us know what happened to JFK. In fact, I actually think I can detail the operation with plentiful evidence. So to somehow compare Waldron with Janney and then say well because Janney might be wrong, that does not mean there was not a conspiracy to kill Mary Meyer, this does not follow logically. Because there is no credible evidence for an alternative theory in that case.
And as I said, one of the worst things about Janney's book is his navigating between the JFK case and the Mary Meyer case so as to set up some kind of comparison between the two, when in reality, there is none. But evidently this has worked on you.
As per your comment on the "spotters", see this is just what I meant by the ending of my essay. If we are to have any credibility as an alternative source of information, then we have to have standards. You cannot just say, "oh the joggers were there as so and so". No. Doesn't fly since there is no credible evidence for that. As I said, its Alex Jones stuff. And I am, in some ways, as opposed to him as I am to the MSM. His is a different method for going to Hades in a hand cart.
As for Albert, he failed to understand not only what I said, but what Janney said. So I won't reply to him anymore about this matter.