23-07-2012, 07:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-07-2012, 08:16 AM by Seamus Coogan.)
Good post Greg however I really have to disagree with you and CD here mate.
Lest we forget there is a whole bunch of people on this very forum that didn't heed our warnings about this piece of shite from Janney.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...Mary+Meyer
Indeed my lack of deep political insight (what ever the heck that is) was criticized for stating that this book would be dog shit. As Cliff Huxtable used to say..."I told you sooooooooo" hahahahahahahaha.
I don't think Jim's being tooooo defensive. Surly, yes lol but more frustrated with having to repeat himself over and over (trust me I know the feeling).
This whole fear of throwing the baby out with the bath water thing in the JFK case works only about 5-10 percent of the time. If that.
Used to its fullest extent brothers it keeps false hopes and frauds like Janney and Lamar Waldron alive! Because yes, both are just as bad as the other. Pity the country that has to choose between them.
Thus in my ruthlessness I don't know how many dreams I've snuffed out and babies I've lost. Frankly folks I really don't give a poo. If an author is shite, their sources used in the book are likely shite and indicates to me that the whole premise has been based on fraudulent claims. Then it is shite! A cigar is a cigar a piece of shite is a piece of shite...tell me peeps is there a colonel of truth in the JFK MJ-12 documents? The short answer to that is a big fat noooooooooo. Look at the bullshit in the Torbitt document. People have been picking gnat shit out of pepper (thank you so much JFK lol) over that sort of crud for years, the Meyer case is the same. Quite frankly folks there are better and more productive things to do than screw around with bad research, bad evidence and a bad case which has no baring what so ever on the Kennedy assassination, except as a tool to posthumously slag Kennedy with. If people wanna go off and do better research than Janney and try and make a better 'non Kennedy' death scenario case then go ahead. Prove to me that it was a 'deep political act' CD, AL or anyone else. But whose got the balls to dismiss the Kennedy angle with Meyer if conspiracy, who here has got the balls to discard Janney's shite and start anew? I don't see anybodies hands going up. If people can't put up decent evidence and decent sources outside this bilge then stiff shit.
So don't get angry about Jim and Lisa throwing Janney out of the window while he was being washed in his baby bath tub by Greg Douglas. From where I stand he's correct and the entire Meyer case is misleading disinfo.
Lest we forget there is a whole bunch of people on this very forum that didn't heed our warnings about this piece of shite from Janney.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...Mary+Meyer
Indeed my lack of deep political insight (what ever the heck that is) was criticized for stating that this book would be dog shit. As Cliff Huxtable used to say..."I told you sooooooooo" hahahahahahahaha.
I don't think Jim's being tooooo defensive. Surly, yes lol but more frustrated with having to repeat himself over and over (trust me I know the feeling).
This whole fear of throwing the baby out with the bath water thing in the JFK case works only about 5-10 percent of the time. If that.
Used to its fullest extent brothers it keeps false hopes and frauds like Janney and Lamar Waldron alive! Because yes, both are just as bad as the other. Pity the country that has to choose between them.
Thus in my ruthlessness I don't know how many dreams I've snuffed out and babies I've lost. Frankly folks I really don't give a poo. If an author is shite, their sources used in the book are likely shite and indicates to me that the whole premise has been based on fraudulent claims. Then it is shite! A cigar is a cigar a piece of shite is a piece of shite...tell me peeps is there a colonel of truth in the JFK MJ-12 documents? The short answer to that is a big fat noooooooooo. Look at the bullshit in the Torbitt document. People have been picking gnat shit out of pepper (thank you so much JFK lol) over that sort of crud for years, the Meyer case is the same. Quite frankly folks there are better and more productive things to do than screw around with bad research, bad evidence and a bad case which has no baring what so ever on the Kennedy assassination, except as a tool to posthumously slag Kennedy with. If people wanna go off and do better research than Janney and try and make a better 'non Kennedy' death scenario case then go ahead. Prove to me that it was a 'deep political act' CD, AL or anyone else. But whose got the balls to dismiss the Kennedy angle with Meyer if conspiracy, who here has got the balls to discard Janney's shite and start anew? I don't see anybodies hands going up. If people can't put up decent evidence and decent sources outside this bilge then stiff shit.
So don't get angry about Jim and Lisa throwing Janney out of the window while he was being washed in his baby bath tub by Greg Douglas. From where I stand he's correct and the entire Meyer case is misleading disinfo.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992