24-07-2012, 03:03 PM
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Al then writes the following...
"I can't explain this without sounding ridiculous but the bigger picture critical key factors all line-up like in other proven covert wacks."
If you can't explain without looking silly why bother bro? The diary stuff is quite clearly a dead end. Much like the B.S surrounding MMonroes diary about JFK...a crock of shite. Look if you wanna make a case for MM's death being some sinister murder, then you can leave JFK out of it.
The only connection Marilyn Monroe would have with Mary Meyer would be sex pot. Otherwise there's no comparison to the political front seat Meyer had both socially and through her background and marriage. In the end Monroe and Majestic are totally irrelevant to the Mary Meyer case.
In my mind Jim has failed to answer for the intruders. I read his referenced post. He said it already answered it. I don't think it did. Jim makes the logical assumption that since the diary is false therefore the home intrusions are false, since the diary didn't exist. Frankly I don't think CTKA would let someone else get away with a logical violation like that. The intrusions exist by themselves. I believe they were real. I think Jim still hasn't accounted for them. If they were real the intruders were looking for something. What were they looking for and why? I think you and Jim fail to realize that even if the diaries were bogus the intruders could still have been looking for them. And the reason they were looking for them could still be associated with Mary Meyer's death. In my mind the intruders are the crack in the door to discounting conspiracy in Meyer's death. Of course the intruder accounts were second-hand. They had to be since Mary Meyer was dead.
I myself, personally, would be less interested in broad swipes at the suggestion of conspiracy and more interested in the specific details of why Cord Meyer said his wife was killed by "the same sons of bitches that killed Kennedy"...