28-07-2012, 01:24 PM
Seamus Coogan Wrote:I say this because quite clearly ... Russ Baker [was] wrong with regards to George Bush and JFK.
"Quite clearly"??? If your certainty derives from the fact that Jim has pronounced this to be so, you need to pursue another line of work.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:What's interesting here is that CD to the best of my knowledge would go along with Jim and I for the most part on Bush.
Your knowledge, in this instance, is fatally flawed.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:The only thing I am actually left concerned about is CD lumping Janney and Jim Di into their own paradigm.
This from the person who wrote, "I say this because quite clearly Paul Kangas, John Hankey and Russ Baker were wrong[.]" Please try to read more carefully; when you reach these clearly unjustified conclusions, you call into question the validity of the body of your work.
Please re-read the following points I made previously:
"The MPM discussion on this thread has devolved into a profoundly counter-productive DiEugenio v. Janney steel cage match. Perhaps by design."
AND
"In re my previous point: The reputations of Messrs. DiEugenio and Janney as they may be impacted by the MPM matter are -- or at least should be -- of no interest to anyone who reads these words (except, of course, the combatants themselves). To pick a side in such a non-fight is to make a classic false choice."
Try it again: Precisely define what I am comparing here.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Jim's comparison between the EF and the DPF, was slightly misguided.
It's a start, at least.