28-07-2012, 02:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-07-2012, 03:42 AM by Albert Doyle.)
I guess what Jim is missing is the fact once you calculate the strange death rate of JFK assassination witnesses into the formula, and include that MPM was most-likely under surveillance with the intruders, the chances that the jogging path incident was a random event goes way down according to probability. The canal path would have been a place where intel monitoring of habits would have placed a good opportunity for a plausibly-deniable death. God knows what the background was on Crump or where they would have had a chance to program him? So, yes, there is a possibility this was a random act and coincidence. But it would be the exception in the Kennedy case.
Even if it was random, however, that doesn't mean that intel wasn't interested in MPM or monitoring her. We all know the JFK case was a wicked conspiracy so therefore intel could have been shocked by the murder and reacted in haste. That would explain many of the events Janney labels as suspicious. Intel was covering all the bases in the assassination. Even if MPM was simply a voice with enough public credibility in relation to JFK to be a danger for potentially speaking out against the official story that would be enough to be a covert person of interest. For God's sake we know the extreme level of reaction the conspirators were applying. If this is so MPM was a danger because she was close in enough to both the presidency and CIA establishment to be a potential witness to what was going-on while having no bureaucratic restriction to keep her from talking. Jim likes to reduce her to a single mom but the truth is she was a regular political dinner party attendee whose skirt brushed directly against the political currents running through the most powerful players. Very similar to Dorothy Kilgallen in a way. Kilgallen didn't need to ingest the entire Warren Report. She just needed to have the right suspicions and confront the right player at the right time to get the full gist. In my mind the right ingredients and modus operandi are all there too prominently to be ignored.
And, geesh, I'd hate to be the person trying to argue that Sirhan and Chapman weren't hypno-programmed.
Even if it was random, however, that doesn't mean that intel wasn't interested in MPM or monitoring her. We all know the JFK case was a wicked conspiracy so therefore intel could have been shocked by the murder and reacted in haste. That would explain many of the events Janney labels as suspicious. Intel was covering all the bases in the assassination. Even if MPM was simply a voice with enough public credibility in relation to JFK to be a danger for potentially speaking out against the official story that would be enough to be a covert person of interest. For God's sake we know the extreme level of reaction the conspirators were applying. If this is so MPM was a danger because she was close in enough to both the presidency and CIA establishment to be a potential witness to what was going-on while having no bureaucratic restriction to keep her from talking. Jim likes to reduce her to a single mom but the truth is she was a regular political dinner party attendee whose skirt brushed directly against the political currents running through the most powerful players. Very similar to Dorothy Kilgallen in a way. Kilgallen didn't need to ingest the entire Warren Report. She just needed to have the right suspicions and confront the right player at the right time to get the full gist. In my mind the right ingredients and modus operandi are all there too prominently to be ignored.
And, geesh, I'd hate to be the person trying to argue that Sirhan and Chapman weren't hypno-programmed.