29-07-2012, 04:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-07-2012, 12:02 AM by Seamus Coogan.)
Dawn lass I have people who like me enough to edit myself when I publish lol.
I hasten to add if indeed you read all my posts. How do you explain the Hankey/JFK Jr posts? Remember the ones I had to repeatedly tell you about that I had not written anything on JFK Jr nor Hankey's take on it?
Let's not bring back bad memories for you, nor get petty.
This whole thing is bigger than you and I.
If CD is really concerned about false paradigms in discussions such as the Meyer case. It would be great to see him construct an essay/s in which he could expand on potential implications of MPM's death. Writings I am sure CTKA would be more than willing to put up on the site. We may differ to him on occasion but that's how much esteem CD observations are held in. That's the kind of bloke one can create a cool paradigm with. I mean check out the hilarious yet informative "Hemming does Dallas" I advise anybody here who hasn't to do so.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...eId=222386
Thus it's not just MPM there's a whole heap of stuff I know I'd pay money to see CD discuss or expand upon outside of DPF. I mean where the hell is 'Autumn too Long?' Did the ARRB have an impact on the direction of the novel? Why has CD decided to go for novelizations and screenplays about say Diana rather than old style conventional research? Did he get bored? In many ways this sort of format is more challenging than conventional analysis, in particularly if one has the integrity of a real researcher. Simply put you need to be informative, but you also have to please an audience. Often that means having to dumb it down. Oh yes and as complex as JFK got, Stone had to dumb stuff down, not only that cut out stuff he really liked.
In our little bubbles we forget that not that many people really read the forums. Sad but true people, its pretty much JFK in house. Do an internet search there's way, way, way more on say Phil Nelson or Jim Fetzer than CD or GME. Now, I don't know about anyone else but that for me is a huge problem. Because invariably, it means that the average punter (the most important person in all this) is increasingly unlikely to encounter CD's stuff. That's a very real problem and it's out of all proportion to CD's efforts over the years.
I hasten to add if indeed you read all my posts. How do you explain the Hankey/JFK Jr posts? Remember the ones I had to repeatedly tell you about that I had not written anything on JFK Jr nor Hankey's take on it?
Let's not bring back bad memories for you, nor get petty.
This whole thing is bigger than you and I.
If CD is really concerned about false paradigms in discussions such as the Meyer case. It would be great to see him construct an essay/s in which he could expand on potential implications of MPM's death. Writings I am sure CTKA would be more than willing to put up on the site. We may differ to him on occasion but that's how much esteem CD observations are held in. That's the kind of bloke one can create a cool paradigm with. I mean check out the hilarious yet informative "Hemming does Dallas" I advise anybody here who hasn't to do so.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...eId=222386
Thus it's not just MPM there's a whole heap of stuff I know I'd pay money to see CD discuss or expand upon outside of DPF. I mean where the hell is 'Autumn too Long?' Did the ARRB have an impact on the direction of the novel? Why has CD decided to go for novelizations and screenplays about say Diana rather than old style conventional research? Did he get bored? In many ways this sort of format is more challenging than conventional analysis, in particularly if one has the integrity of a real researcher. Simply put you need to be informative, but you also have to please an audience. Often that means having to dumb it down. Oh yes and as complex as JFK got, Stone had to dumb stuff down, not only that cut out stuff he really liked.
In our little bubbles we forget that not that many people really read the forums. Sad but true people, its pretty much JFK in house. Do an internet search there's way, way, way more on say Phil Nelson or Jim Fetzer than CD or GME. Now, I don't know about anyone else but that for me is a huge problem. Because invariably, it means that the average punter (the most important person in all this) is increasingly unlikely to encounter CD's stuff. That's a very real problem and it's out of all proportion to CD's efforts over the years.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992