06-11-2013, 06:17 PM
William L Mitchell's evasive quietness speaks more than words in my opinion. Crack that guy and you'll find out Janney is on the right track. Mitchell lied about working at the CIA cover safe-house Georgetown University, he listed a known CIA safe-house as his residence, and he lied to friends about the alleged scholarship he received in order to go overseas right after their set-up of Crump failed and people might have asked questions why Mitchell was so interested in fingering Crump. I mean CIA paid for that trip, right? How could Janney's critics ignore that?
Look at the bigger picture here. Peter Janney just openly accused an emeritus college professor of being the CIA assassin of Mary Pinchot Meyer in public, in writing, in a book. Mitchell's and the media's response? Nothing. What pattern does that fit? Would a high-profile professor let a slander like that go unanswered? How does this contrast with Mitchell's original pro-active coming forward and serving as witness? Mitchell did disappear and never comment on this again. You would think he would at least have some public thoughts about it over 50 years, right? Something isn't right.
Look at the bigger picture here. Peter Janney just openly accused an emeritus college professor of being the CIA assassin of Mary Pinchot Meyer in public, in writing, in a book. Mitchell's and the media's response? Nothing. What pattern does that fit? Would a high-profile professor let a slander like that go unanswered? How does this contrast with Mitchell's original pro-active coming forward and serving as witness? Mitchell did disappear and never comment on this again. You would think he would at least have some public thoughts about it over 50 years, right? Something isn't right.