30-10-2013, 08:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-10-2013, 08:35 PM by Marc Ellis.)
I bought it and read it on my iPad. Excellent work. Excellent reference.
I'm still a novice in assassination lore. I lean toward CT because of 544 Camp Street
and Clinton. But I'm still studying the points of view.
It seems the LN theorists want the inquiry to stop. The CT'ers seem to understand that these sorts of historical inquiries must by their nature, continue. The interpretation of historical events is rarely a static and settled thing. Conclusions change.
i haven't subscribed to any particular CT yet. But I've read McAdams & other LN'ers and I find several of the arguments strained at best (the 544 Camp Street/531 Lafayette & Clinton for example.)
And I doubt Oswald could have made those shots too.
But I'm still keeping an open mind.
I'm still a novice in assassination lore. I lean toward CT because of 544 Camp Street
and Clinton. But I'm still studying the points of view.
It seems the LN theorists want the inquiry to stop. The CT'ers seem to understand that these sorts of historical inquiries must by their nature, continue. The interpretation of historical events is rarely a static and settled thing. Conclusions change.
i haven't subscribed to any particular CT yet. But I've read McAdams & other LN'ers and I find several of the arguments strained at best (the 544 Camp Street/531 Lafayette & Clinton for example.)
And I doubt Oswald could have made those shots too.
But I'm still keeping an open mind.