Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency and GM Evica's writings

[Magda Hassan]

1)I know ,from reading other threads here , that you profile new members.
Had I wanted to hide my identity , I would have registered under another name.

The deception would have had a short shelf life: Your embrace of the LN lie would have seeped out of you like pus from an infected wound.

You imply - nay , you STATE - that I am "cognitively impaired".

Not true. I left open the possibilities that you do not enjoy reasonable access to the legitimate evidence in the JFK case and/or that you are complicit in the crime.

I am now prepared to stipulate that, to the best of my ability to judge, you do indeed enjoy access to legitimate evidence in the JFK case.

[/COLOR]You state : "The Lone Nut lie will not be debated or otherwise entertained on Deep Politics Forum".

That is hardly consistent with the "free speech" clause in the Rules of Engagement , is it ?

It is damnably consistent with DPF's policy of not engaging proponents of the LN lie. Rather, our missions are to expose and ridicule them for what they are. Your LN position is not worthy of serious consideration. It is a long-exposed deception, and you will not be allowed to imply, let alone directly state, that it is anything but a lie.


There is no place for you here, Mr. Hanson. You have failed in your mission.

Go away, please.

What was it Henry Ford said ? Something about you can have any colour , as long as it's black ? Here , it's you can have any opinion - as long as you don't attack Oswald.

Sorry it took me so long to reply , but I see there's been some developments since then. How's all that petty political in-fighting going between you and certain other DPF-ers ?

Attack Oswald or Kennedy all you like. With facts. And as for Oswald's role in the assassination that is well established and we are not going to go over it all again for your benefit. It is lone nutters that we don't have here. Why are you here?

[Dawn Meredith]

1)I know ,from reading other threads here , that you profile new members.
Had I wanted to hide my identity , I would have registered under another name.

The deception would have had a short shelf life: Your embrace of the LN lie would have seeped out of you like pus from an infected wound.





Not true. I left open the possibilities that you do not enjoy reasonable access to the legitimate evidence in the JFK case and/or that you are complicit in the crime.

I am now prepared to stipulate that, to the best of my ability to judge, you do indeed enjoy access to legitimate evidence in the JFK case.

[/COLOR]You state : "The Lone Nut lie will not be debated or otherwise entertained on Deep Politics Forum".

That is hardly consistent with the "free speech" clause in the Rules of Engagement , is it ?

It is damnably consistent with DPF's policy of not engaging proponents of the LN lie. Rather, our missions are to expose and ridicule them for what they are. Your LN position is not worthy of serious consideration. It is a long-exposed deception, and you will not be allowed to imply, let alone directly state, that it is anything but a lie.


There is no place for you here, Mr. Hanson. You have failed in your mission.

Go away, please.

What was it Henry Ford said ? Something about you can have any colour , as long as it's black ? Here , it's you can have any opinion - as long as you don't attack Oswald.

Sorry it took me so long to reply , but I see there's been some developments since then. How's all that petty political in-fighting going between you and certain other DPF-ers ?

Attack Oswald or Kennedy all you like. With facts. And as for Oswald's role in the assassination that is well established and we are not going to go over it all again for your benefit. It is lone nutters that we don't have here. Why are you here?

Wait, isn't our rule that we simply do not allow lone nutters here? I vote to immediately ban this guy. He's obviously here to stir up trouble.
Bye wack job. Peddle your bs where someone cares.

Dawn

[Jim Hackett II]

Sheesh....
There is no "almost convinced" as Charles says given the evidence of this date.

The Conspiracy is a given.

Argumentation suggests a possible paucity of knowledge of the evidence.
I've read enough to conclude.

[Tracy Riddle]

There are only two ways to defend the Warren Commission - by ignorance or deception. That's it. I like to think that most lone-nutters are simply "subject matter ignoramuses" as Harold Weisberg called them.

[Charles Drago]

One of the key mantras of deep politics research is "question the timing" ...

The demise of EF.

The recent contretemps between myself and certain DPF members.

The choice by "Marcus Hanson" of work by George Michael Evica -- the radical historian who is my dearest mentor and friend, and whose memory I am well known to guard most zealously -- to use in the title of a thread on which "Hanson" tries to stir my passions and thus rekindle extinguished animosities.

The 50th.

Just for starters.

You're right, Dawn. "Marcus Hanson" should be banned immediately.

I'll answer Magda's question: "He" is here on assignment.

That our door has not already been barred to "Marcus Hanson" is a puzzling but easily remedied oversight.

[Jan Klimkowski]

That our door has not already been barred to "Marcus Hanson" is a puzzling but easily remedied oversight.

Not particularly puzzling, Charles.

The guy made 2 posts in January and 2 more today, for a total of 4 posts on DPF.

We've now travelled enough time zones for a quorum to form, and the voting is clear.

One less Lone Nutter....

:panic:

[Charles Drago]

Well done.

[Jim Hackett II]

I just wanted to recount (again) the unfolding of the events of Big D almost 50 years ago.
Why?

I reread this thread and was much impressed by the members recounting their own personal experiences of Nov. 22, 1963 to Nov. 26, 1963 and after.

I was 10 in August 1963 so I was naive. The unbelievable and difficult to accept murder of the President by a "commie" defector was to me acceptable as reality only after shock.

By chance I was home with my brother and my Momma when Pop called home at lunchtime to drop the news into the home. The TV was turned on before the arrest of the Patsy, during the "death-watch" of early Friday afternoon.

Then we learned of the instant arrest of a "cop-killer" within hours, they had their man. DPD sure was efficient.
It didn't occur to me then to ask if they could nab the murderer so quickly how could they not stop the murder in the first place? With the FBI and USSS helping all along?

The happenstance of a family funeral in the really cold graveside ceremonies for my favorite Aunt on Wednesday led to the choice of Momma to hold her sons out of school. Thursday we woke to colds sniffles and all the rest in one of Mom's hardships. Two sick kids and she put her foot down no school Friday either.

Our reaction was "Yippee" until lunchtime.

I knew Abe Lincoln had been killed in office and it was a tragedy for the Nation. Even at age 10 the assassination of the President was confounding and confusing.
I do not remember the adults openly crying but being somber.

All Saturday through the pain and shock all around me the people wanted more news and information of the Patsy and "the case". A nation was buoyed by the also hurting widow.
She held up so we all could too.

Liberally sprinkled in the Beltway doings was chaotic scenes from Dallas.
I remember thinking no one was in control in Dallas. Youth is my only excuse for this view.

By the Sunday murder of the "commie" by a "police-friend" well known to DPD and instantly identified by the officers in the jail basement it all turned my view inside-out.

Even at age 10, the world was changed to me that Sunday.

I never remember no adults accepting the "Warren Report" 10 months later.
I recall adult comments that we will never find out what happened at that time.

Monday when we went back to school - there was no other topic of conversation but the assassination of the President.

Big D's government, the Texas' government and the US Government thought they buried all doubts when Jack Ruby died of cancer after securing another trial for the murder of Lee H. Oswald.

The odd deaths of the killer of the "commie" patsy and the patsy ironically spurred me to be curious about the events of the Nov. Coup.

Strange and Bitter fruit would be borne of the curiosity by 1968.

Then there was Martin and Bobby....
Open the floodgates....
Something is fishy in DC.

[Cliff Varnell]

Well done.

If a guy posts on a forum devoted to the study of mathematics that 1 + 1 = 3 -- he'd be booted.

Thanks for providing an LN free-zone, ya'all...