14-01-2013, 07:28 PM
Dial Ryder was a gunsmith who said a man calling himself Oswald came into his Irving, Texas gun shop and ordered a scope mounted on an Italian rifle. In reading the Warren Commission deposition of Ryder my judgment is that Liebeler was seeking to discredit Ryder by the quickest route and did so by proving Ryder lied about being interviewed by a Dallas Morning News reporter. Something smells to high heaven about Ryder's testimony and what I see jumping out at me is Ryder cooperating with the scuttling of his witnessing by denying a proven interview. When reading the deposition what I see is Liebeler going right for this ruse and ignoring everything else. I believe Ryder was gotten to and cooperated with this device. Meanwhile Liebeler has very little interest in the main issue, which was finding-out about Oswald's visit to Ryder's gun shop. I think what we have here is a serious case of high level suborning of perjury by a Warren Commission lawyer.
If you go to Liebeler's deposition of corroborating witnesses Edith Whitworth and Gertrude Hunter he does the same with them. Liebeler steers the inquiry toward suggesting that the visit these two ladies witnessed of the Oswald family to their furniture shop was actually the memory of another witnessing by these ladies of the Oswald's at another time. If you read the deposition Liebeler is trying to steer the ladies towards thinking that they mis-remembered this event and mistook it for another witnessing of the Oswald's shopping with Ruth Paine. Liebeler screwed-up here big time and no one caught it. While trying to convince the ladies that this other visit is what they remembered Liebeler forgot that Whitworth and Hunter had described in detail their witnessing of Marina's tiny baby. Indeed June Oswald was born only 2 weeks prior to this November 5th visit. What Liebeler forgot in his zeal to conceal this visit is that if this had been confused for the earlier visit with Ruth Paine driving June hadn't been born yet. So by his own entries Liebeler has disproven the very evidence he is using to discredit Whitworth and Hunter and their serious witnessing of Oswald. This is very serious because it corroborates Ryder's story. Something Liebeler successfully dodged with his corrupted ruse.
The final clue is the last part of the deposition where Liebeler takes Marina to Whitworth's furniture shop and asks her if she remembers visiting there? Marina says no and Liebeler accepts it without question. The deposition is then adjourned. I mean what is clearly obvious here is Ryder was suborned and gotten to in order to cooperate with a quick destruction of his credibility and therefore witnessing. Marina has obviously also been gotten to and is following instructions. There's no doubt the Oswald's visited Whitworth's shop because the two ladies described the visit in too much detail for it to be a crazy invention. It also fits Oswald seeing the plaque for the gunsmith who used to occupy a corner of Whitworth's shop. This motive, that was never quite discussed by Liebeler, corroborates Ryder. Furthermore, Schmidt, the Dallas Morning News reporter said the media first found out about Ryder from a tip-off. Well, the tip-off was Whitworth and Hunter. Examination of the timing of this tip-off shows it happened way too early for any hoaxers to have so much detail about the Oswald's. Especially June Oswald whose evidentiary conflict I described above is fatal to the Warren Commission. What you have here is serious evidence of Warren Commission corruption and evasion of evidence. Ryder had to be quickly discredited because otherwise they would have gotten to the point of asking why, if Oswald had ordered the scope-mounted Carcano from Klein's, did he need Ryder to mount a scope on his rifle?
If you go to Liebeler's deposition of corroborating witnesses Edith Whitworth and Gertrude Hunter he does the same with them. Liebeler steers the inquiry toward suggesting that the visit these two ladies witnessed of the Oswald family to their furniture shop was actually the memory of another witnessing by these ladies of the Oswald's at another time. If you read the deposition Liebeler is trying to steer the ladies towards thinking that they mis-remembered this event and mistook it for another witnessing of the Oswald's shopping with Ruth Paine. Liebeler screwed-up here big time and no one caught it. While trying to convince the ladies that this other visit is what they remembered Liebeler forgot that Whitworth and Hunter had described in detail their witnessing of Marina's tiny baby. Indeed June Oswald was born only 2 weeks prior to this November 5th visit. What Liebeler forgot in his zeal to conceal this visit is that if this had been confused for the earlier visit with Ruth Paine driving June hadn't been born yet. So by his own entries Liebeler has disproven the very evidence he is using to discredit Whitworth and Hunter and their serious witnessing of Oswald. This is very serious because it corroborates Ryder's story. Something Liebeler successfully dodged with his corrupted ruse.
The final clue is the last part of the deposition where Liebeler takes Marina to Whitworth's furniture shop and asks her if she remembers visiting there? Marina says no and Liebeler accepts it without question. The deposition is then adjourned. I mean what is clearly obvious here is Ryder was suborned and gotten to in order to cooperate with a quick destruction of his credibility and therefore witnessing. Marina has obviously also been gotten to and is following instructions. There's no doubt the Oswald's visited Whitworth's shop because the two ladies described the visit in too much detail for it to be a crazy invention. It also fits Oswald seeing the plaque for the gunsmith who used to occupy a corner of Whitworth's shop. This motive, that was never quite discussed by Liebeler, corroborates Ryder. Furthermore, Schmidt, the Dallas Morning News reporter said the media first found out about Ryder from a tip-off. Well, the tip-off was Whitworth and Hunter. Examination of the timing of this tip-off shows it happened way too early for any hoaxers to have so much detail about the Oswald's. Especially June Oswald whose evidentiary conflict I described above is fatal to the Warren Commission. What you have here is serious evidence of Warren Commission corruption and evasion of evidence. Ryder had to be quickly discredited because otherwise they would have gotten to the point of asking why, if Oswald had ordered the scope-mounted Carcano from Klein's, did he need Ryder to mount a scope on his rifle?
