US/NATO War on Russia

[Paul Rigby]

There are as yet unconfirmed reports that may indicate an impending attempted military assault on the Crimea by military forces that obey the Putsch regime in Kiev.

KIEV IS PREPARING FULL-SCALE INVASION IN CRIMEA

Russian source:

http://stbcaptain.livejournal.com/84443.html

https://www.facebook.com/ukrainiandefens...6873514425

27th Uragan self-propelled rocket launcher system regiment (16 launchers per truck, 220 mm caliber, warhead weight 100 kg, maximum destruction range 35 km; the distance from Chaplinka to Perekop is 30 km) is moving out from Sumy.

Unfortunately my personal opinion on the probable developments around Crimea is that Kiev has decided to prepare a military strike on Crimea.

1. As the Minister of Defense admiral Tenukh (born in Lvov region) is unable to plan large-scale on-land operations, Messrs. Turchinov, Parubiy and Yatseniuk have decided to appoint three of his deputies to plan the operation. All three generals Oleinik, Mozharovsky and Babenko have declined this offer, which resulted in their dismissal; this personnel breach was filled in by a retired colonel Petr Mekhed, whose last official position was the Deputy Director of the Department for International Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.

2. There is no confirmed information about who of the Ukrainian Generals has agreed to implement the plan, which in its core resembles the Georgian attack on Southern Ossetia. However, if we consider the fact that active protection gear is being installed on the tanks of the 1st separate tank brigade (Goncharovskoye, Chernigov region) and that 26th artillery brigade (Berdichev, Zhitomir region) and 27th self-propelled rocket launcher system regiment (Sumy) are moving out, one could assume that the 8th army corps under command of lieutenant general Petr Mikhailovich Litvin will be the core of the group.

3. 79th separate airborne brigade has been deployed to block the Crimean passage necks. 8th army corps (Zhitomir) is moving out to the south, which contains of two mechanized and one tank brigades. They can also engage 25th separate paratroopers brigade (Dnepropetrovsk) and other units from 6th army corps (Dnepropetrovsk). The created group (depending on the results of their "cooperation" with the commanders) can be more than serious up to two tank and four mechanized brigades with artillery support units as well as a paratrooper and airborne brigades and a special forces regiment.

4. From the military point of view this is nothing else but an assault operation, which immediate goal is to capture the passage necks and moving out to maneuver room with the final goal being to de-block the Ukrainian military bases and facilities. From a political point of view capturing Dzhankoi and Simferopol will ensure that no referendum is held.

5. As we have found out, "maidan self-defense activists" (who are mostly the Right-Wing Sector members) have been appointed to accompany the military units commanders, whose task is to ensure active political propaganda for the army personnel and to supervise the commanders with a right to suspend them.

I do not want and will not comment on the reasons of Kiev decision to go "all in" hoping to unleash a military conflict with Russia let the politicians think and talk about it.

I personally hope that the reason of the Ukrainian military commanders will take over the demands of their political leaders and that Petr Mikhailovich will think before giving an order to open fire.

This is one of the rare cases, when I sincerely wish I was wrong.

There was a time once, when everyone should have shouted about Saakashvily not dismissing his reserves after the "maneuvers", sending tanks to Tskhinval and deploying artillery and rocket launchers. Everybody kept quiet. Nobody prevented Saakashvili from giving an order to start the war…"

- Posted by Mark Sleboda

[Peter Lemkin]

By [URL="http://williamblum.org/aer/read/126"]William Blum Published March 7th, 2014
[/URL]


Ukraine

When it gets complicated and confusing, when you're overwhelmed with too much information, changing daily; too many explanations, some contradictory … try putting it into some kind of context by stepping back and looking at the larger, long-term picture.
The United States strives for world domination, hegemony wherever possible, their main occupation for over a century, it's what they do for a living. The United States, NATO and the European Union form The Holy Triumvirate. The Holy Triumvirate has subsidiaries, chiefly The International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, International Criminal Court … all help to keep in line those governments lacking the Holy Triumvirate Seal Of Approval: the IMF, WB, and WTO impose market fundamentalism, while foreign leaders who act too independent are threatened with being handed over to the ICC for heavy punishment, as the United States imposes sanctions on governments and their leaders as only the King of Sanctions can, lacking any sense of hypocrisy or irony.
And who threatens United States domination? Who can challenge The Holy Triumvirate's hegemony? Only Russia and China, if they were as imperialistic as the Western powers. (No, the Soviet Union wasn't imperialistic; that was self-defense; Eastern Europe was a highway twice used by the West to invade; tens of millions of Russians killed or wounded.)
Since the end of the Cold War the United States has been surrounding Russia, building one base after another, ceaselessly looking for new ones, including in Ukraine; one missile site after another, with Moscow in range; NATO has grabbed one former Soviet Republic after another. The White House, and the unquestioning American mainstream media, have assured us that such operations have nothing to do with Russia. And Russia has been told the same, much to Moscow's continuous skepticism. "Look," said Russian president Vladimir Putin about NATO some years ago, "is this is a military organization? Yes, it's military. … Is it moving towards our border? It's moving towards our border. Why?"
The Holy Triumvirate would love to rip Ukraine from the Moscow bosom, evict the Russian Black Sea Fleet, and establish a US military and/or NATO presence on Russia's border. (In case you were wondering what prompted the Russian military action.) Kiev's membership in the EU would then not be far off; after which the country could embrace the joys of neo-conservatism, receiving the benefits of the standard privatization-deregulation-austerity package and join Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain as an impoverished orphan of the family; but no price is too great to pay to for being part of glorious Europe and the West!
The Ukrainian insurgents and their Western-power supporters didn't care who their Ukrainian allies were in carrying out their coup against President Viktor Yanukovych last month … thugs who set policemen on fire head to toe … all manner of extreme right-wingers, including Chechnyan Islamic militants … a deputy of the ultra-right Svoboda Party, part of the new government, who threatens to rebuild Ukraine's nukes in three to six months. … the snipers firing on the protestors who apparently were not what they appeared to be A bugged phone conversation between Urmas Paet, the Estonian foreign minister, and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, reveals Paet saying: "There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition." … neo-Nazi protestors in Kiev who have openly denounced Jews, hoisting a banner honoring Stepan Bandera, the infamous Ukrainian nationalist who collaborated with the German Nazis during World War II and whose militias participated in atrocities against Jews and Poles.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on February 24 that Ukrainian Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman advised "Kiev's Jews to leave the city and even the country." Edward Dolinsky, head of an umbrella organization of Ukrainian Jews, described the situation for Ukrainian Jews as "dire" and requested Israel's help.
All in all a questionable gang of allies for a dubious cause; reminiscent of the Kosovo Liberation Army thugs Washington put into power for an earlier regime change, and has kept in power since 1999.
The now-famous recorded phone conversation between top US State Department official Victoria Nuland and the US ambassador to the Ukraine, wherein they discuss which Ukrainians would be to Washington's liking in a new government, and which not, is an example of this regime-change mentality. Nuland's choice, Arseniy Yatseniuk, emerged as interim prime minister.
The National Endowment for Democracy, an agency created by the Reagan administration in 1983 to promote political action and psychological warfare against states not in love with US foreign policy, is Washington's foremost non-military tool for effecting regime change. The NED website lists 65 projects that it has supported financially in recent years in Ukraine. The descriptions NED gives to the projects don't reveal the fact that generally their programs impart the basic philosophy that working people and other citizens are best served under a system of free enterprise, class cooperation, collective bargaining, minimal government intervention in the economy, and opposition to socialism in any shape or form. A free-market economy is equated with democracy, reform, and growth; and the merits of foreign investment in their economy are emphasized.
The idea was that the NED would do somewhat overtly what the CIA had been doing covertly for decades, and thus, hopefully, eliminate the stigma associated with CIA covert activities. Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, declared in 1991: "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."
NED, receives virtually all its financing from the US government ($5 billion in total since 1991 ), but it likes to refer to itself as an NGO (Non-governmental organization) because this helps to maintain a certain credibility abroad that an official US government agency might not have. But NGO is the wrong category. NED is a GO. Its long-time intervention in Ukraine is as supra-legal as the Russian military deployment there. Journalist Robert Parry has observed:

For NED and American neocons, Yanukovych's electoral legitimacy lasted only as long as he accepted European demands for new "trade agreements" and stern economic "reforms" required by the International Monetary Fund. When Yanukovych was negotiating those pacts, he won praise, but when he judged the price too high for Ukraine and opted for a more generous deal from Russia, he immediately became a target for "regime change."

Thus, we have to ask, as Mr. Putin asked "Why?" Why has NED been funding 65 projects in one foreign country? Why were Washington officials grooming a replacement for President Yanukovych, legally and democratically elected in 2010, who, in the face of protests, moved elections up so he could have been voted out of office not thrown out by a mob? Yanukovych made repeated important concessions, including amnesty for those arrested and offering, on January 25, to make two of his adversaries prime minister and deputy prime minister; all to no avail; key elements of the protestors, and those behind them, wanted their putsch.
Carl Gershman, president of NED, wrote last September that "Ukraine is the biggest prize". The man knows whereof he speaks. He has presided over NED since its beginning, overseeing the Rose Revolution in Georgia (2003), the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (2004), the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon (2005), the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan (2005), the Green Revolution in Iran (2009), and now Ukraine once again. It's as if the Cold War never ended.
The current unbridled animosity of the American media toward Putin also reflects an old practice. The United States is so accustomed to world leaders holding their tongue and not voicing criticism of Washington's policies appropriate to the criminality of those policies, that when a Vladimir Putin comes along and expresses even a relatively mild condemnation he is labeled Public Enemy Number One and his words are accordingly ridiculed or ignored.
On March 2 US Secretary of State John Kerry condemned Russia's "incredible act of aggression" in Ukraine (Crimea) and threatened economic sanctions. "You just don't in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text."
Iraq was in the 21st century. Senator John Kerry voted for it. Hypocrisy of this magnitude has to be respected.
POSTSCRIPT: Ukraine's interim prime minister announced March 7 that he has invited the NATO Council to hold a meeting in Kiev over the recent developments in the country. "I invited the North Atlantic Council to visit Kiev and hold a meeting there," Arseny Yatsenyuk said during a visit to Brussels, where he met with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and EU officials. "We believe that it will strengthen our cooperation."

[David Guyatt]

William Blum sees it as it is, methinks.

[Paul Rigby]

Very odd to see the Daily Blackshirt publicizing the presence of "Blackwater" (old name, but much better known) in a pro-Russian city, is it not?

And what of the claim within the report that "passers-by shout 'Blackwater! Blackwater!'"

What, in English?

Has Blackwater been deployed to Ukraine? Notorious U.S. mercenaries 'seen on the streets of flashpoint city' as Russia claims 300 hired guns have arrived in country

Unidentified armed men seen on the streets of Donetsk in east Ukraine
Russian diplomat claims 300 mercenaries had arrived in Kiev this week
Mercenaries in the region could give Putin pretext for military action
Donetsk has been the scene of big pro-Russian demonstrations this week
By DAMIEN GAYLE
PUBLISHED: 22:49, 8 March 2014 | UPDATED: 00:37, 9 March 2014

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z2vRORV2Ae

[Paul Rigby]

There are as yet unconfirmed reports that may indicate an impending attempted military assault on the Crimea by military forces that obey the Putsch regime in Kiev.

KIEV IS PREPARING FULL-SCALE INVASION IN CRIMEA

Russian source:

http://stbcaptain.livejournal.com/84443.html

https://www.facebook.com/ukrainiandefens...6873514425

27th Uragan self-propelled rocket launcher system regiment (16 launchers per truck, 220 mm caliber, warhead weight 100 kg, maximum destruction range 35 km; the distance from Chaplinka to Perekop is 30 km) is moving out from Sumy.

Unfortunately my personal opinion on the probable developments around Crimea is that Kiev has decided to prepare a military strike on Crimea.

1. As the Minister of Defense admiral Tenukh (born in Lvov region) is unable to plan large-scale on-land operations, Messrs. Turchinov, Parubiy and Yatseniuk have decided to appoint three of his deputies to plan the operation. All three generals Oleinik, Mozharovsky and Babenko have declined this offer, which resulted in their dismissal; this personnel breach was filled in by a retired colonel Petr Mekhed, whose last official position was the Deputy Director of the Department for International Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.

2. There is no confirmed information about who of the Ukrainian Generals has agreed to implement the plan, which in its core resembles the Georgian attack on Southern Ossetia. However, if we consider the fact that active protection gear is being installed on the tanks of the 1st separate tank brigade (Goncharovskoye, Chernigov region) and that 26th artillery brigade (Berdichev, Zhitomir region) and 27th self-propelled rocket launcher system regiment (Sumy) are moving out, one could assume that the 8th army corps under command of lieutenant general Petr Mikhailovich Litvin will be the core of the group.

3. 79th separate airborne brigade has been deployed to block the Crimean passage necks. 8th army corps (Zhitomir) is moving out to the south, which contains of two mechanized and one tank brigades. They can also engage 25th separate paratroopers brigade (Dnepropetrovsk) and other units from 6th army corps (Dnepropetrovsk). The created group (depending on the results of their "cooperation" with the commanders) can be more than serious up to two tank and four mechanized brigades with artillery support units as well as a paratrooper and airborne brigades and a special forces regiment.

4. From the military point of view this is nothing else but an assault operation, which immediate goal is to capture the passage necks and moving out to maneuver room with the final goal being to de-block the Ukrainian military bases and facilities. From a political point of view capturing Dzhankoi and Simferopol will ensure that no referendum is held.

5. As we have found out, "maidan self-defense activists" (who are mostly the Right-Wing Sector members) have been appointed to accompany the military units commanders, whose task is to ensure active political propaganda for the army personnel and to supervise the commanders with a right to suspend them.

I do not want and will not comment on the reasons of Kiev decision to go "all in" hoping to unleash a military conflict with Russia let the politicians think and talk about it.

I personally hope that the reason of the Ukrainian military commanders will take over the demands of their political leaders and that Petr Mikhailovich will think before giving an order to open fire.

This is one of the rare cases, when I sincerely wish I was wrong.

There was a time once, when everyone should have shouted about Saakashvily not dismissing his reserves after the "maneuvers", sending tanks to Tskhinval and deploying artillery and rocket launchers. Everybody kept quiet. Nobody prevented Saakashvili from giving an order to start the war…"

- Posted by Mark Sleboda

UKRAINE'S MILITARY MOBILIZES, PREPARES FOR COMBAT: TRUCKS, APCS, SAMS, TANKS ROLLING OUT

March 8, 2014

Video of the US-controlled Ukrainian forces marching off to war, the better to facilitate NATO intervention.

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Ukraine%2...8/Y/M.html

[Paul Rigby]

Why There Will Be War in Ukraine

By Global Research News
Global Research, March 08, 2014
Moscow Times

http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-there-w...ne/5372456

By Sergei Markov

The current crisis is not about Crimea. It is about the rights of Russian-speakers throughout Ukraine whom the Kremlin wants to protect from violence and discrimination. Russia does not want a military intervention in Crimea and does not want to take Crimea from Ukraine.

There is a political solution to this crisis.

First, create a coalition government in Kiev composed of all parties, including those from the east and south of the country. The current government is dominated by anti-Russian extremists from western Ukraine.

Second, Ukraine needs to draft a democratic constitution that has guarantees for Ukraine's Russian-speaking population that would grant official status to the Russian language and establish the principle of federalism.

Third, presidential and parliamentary elections must be held soon. Independent election observers must play an active role in ensuring that the elections are free and fair. There is a real danger that they will be manipulated by the neo-Nazi militants who de facto seized power in a coup.

If these democratic and peaceful solutions to the crisis in Ukraine are rejected by the opposition forces that have seized power in Kiev, I am afraid that Russia will have no other choice but to revert to military means. If the junta leaders want to avoid war, they need to adopt Moscow's peaceful and democratic proposals and adhere to them.

Those currently in power in Kiev are carrying out a political strategy that is not so much pro-European as it is anti-Russian, as evidenced by the surprisingly heavy-handed tactics the U.S. and European Union have employed in Ukraine. In the end, a minority executed a violent coup that removed the democratically elected and legitimate president of Ukraine.

The Kremlin believes that the current Ukrainian leadership will manipulate the elections planned for May 25 to install a single leader or coalition government functioning much as former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili did in Tbilisi. A "Ukrainian Saakashvili" will unleash an even more repressive campaign of intimidation against Russian-speakers, one that over several years would stoke anti-Russia hysteria among the general population.

After that, Kiev may evict Russia's Black Sea Fleet from Sevastopol and purge Crimea of any Russian influence. Ukraine could easily become a radicalized, anti-Russian state, at which point Kiev will fabricate a pretext to justify taking subversive action against Moscow. This looks especially likely considering that ruling coalition members from the neo-fascist Svoboda and Right Sector parties have already made territorial claims against Russia. They could easily send their army of activists to Russia to join local separatists and foment rebellion in the North Caucasus and other unstable regions in Russia. In addition, Russia's opposition movement will surely want to use the successful experience and technology of the Euromaidan protests and, with the help and financial support of the West, try to carry out their own revolution in Moscow. The goal: to remove President Vladimir Putin from power and install a puppet leadership that will sell Russia's strategic interests out to the West in the same way former President Boris Yeltsin did in the 1990s.

The official census puts the Russian minority in Ukraine at 16 percent of the total population, although that number was falsified. The actual number is closer to 25 percent. Surveys indicate that 45 percent of the country's population speak Russian at home, 45 percent speak Ukrainian and 10 percent speak both languages. In the most recent Gallup survey, when asked in which language they would like to be polled, 83 percent of respondents chose Russian. Taking into account the rural population in western and central Ukraine, about 75 percent of the people, probably speak Russian. Of that 75 percent, only about 10 percent are those in Kiev and a few other major cities who supported the protests. This means that only 35 percent of the population are attempting to impose its will on the remaining 65 percent, using a violent coup to achieve their goals.

Putin made the right decision: He did not to wait for that attack and took preventative measures. Many in the West say the Kremlin's reactions were paranoiac, but Germany's Jews also thought the same of leaving the country in 1934. Most of them chose to believe they were safe and remained in Germany even after Hitler came to power. The infamous Kristallnacht took place five years later, one of the first early chapters in the "Final Solution." Similarly, just four years remain until Russia's presidential election in 2018, and there is a strong risk that subversive forces within and outside Russia will try to overthrow Putin, in part using their new foothold in Ukraine.

If the extremists who seized power in Kiev do not accept Russia's democratic proposals, Russia will likely be forced to revert to military means to solve the crisis in Ukraine.

Will there be war in Ukraine? I am afraid so. After all, the extremists who seized power in Kiev want to see a bloodbath. Only fear for their own lives might stop them from inciting such a conflict. Russia is prepared to move its forces into southern and eastern Ukraine if repressive measures are used against the Russian-speaking population or if a military intervention occurs. Russia will not annex Crimea. It has enough territory already. At the same time, however, it will also not stand by passively while Russophobic and neo-Nazi gangs hold the people of Crimea, Kharkiv and Donetsk at their mercy.

Sergei Markov is director of the Institute of Political Studies.

Copyright Moscow Times 2014

[David Guyatt]

Very odd to see the Daily Blackshirt publicizing the presence of "Blackwater" (old name, but much better known) in a pro-Russian city, is it not?

And what of the claim within the report that "passers-by shout 'Blackwater! Blackwater!'"

What, in English?

Has Blackwater been deployed to Ukraine? Notorious U.S. mercenaries 'seen on the streets of flashpoint city' as Russia claims 300 hired guns have arrived in country

Unidentified armed men seen on the streets of Donetsk in east Ukraine
Russian diplomat claims 300 mercenaries had arrived in Kiev this week
Mercenaries in the region could give Putin pretext for military action
Donetsk has been the scene of big pro-Russian demonstrations this week
By DAMIEN GAYLE
PUBLISHED: 22:49, 8 March 2014 | UPDATED: 00:37, 9 March 2014

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z2vRORV2Ae

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised.

Obama will be quite pleased at the way the Ukrainian destabilization plan is proceeding I suppose.

[Magda Hassan]

A googlish translation

Contacts Greek fascists and neo-Nazis in Ukraine

13:14 Mar 08 2014 | tvxsteam tvxs.gr/node/150115

Photos will be posted on the page of a neo-fascist group "Greek Action", which descends in local elections in the municipality Kalamata, showing the head and mayoral candidate George Dimitroulia have contacts with members of the Ukrainian party Svoboda.

The party Svoboda from the "National Socialist Party of Ukraine", which was founded in 1991.
Photos uploaded in mid-January on page maintained by the "Greek Action" on Facebook. These images have probably withdrawn as it is no longer visible on the page.
However, have been published on the website ellinikidrasi.wordpress.com.

[SUP]O C. DIMITROULIA with Serhiy Nadal party Svoboda[/SUP]

[SUP]To the right of the party with MP Svoboda[/SUP]
Other photos from the visit Dimitroulia in Ukraine:
[SUP](Click on images)[/SUP]

http://translate.google.com/translate?de...-oykranias

[Magda Hassan]

More googlish about the calls from Ukrainian fascists to Chechen terrorist to join with them against Russia.

[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #e6e6e6, align: center"]

Kadyrov promised to check Ukrainian radicals to communicate with terrorists. TFR started dealing

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]

[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Chechen officials seriously suited to the verification of information about a possible link between Ukrainian politicians nationalist persuasion, including the "right sector," with the North Caucasus terrorist thugs promised the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. Meanwhile, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiated a criminal case against the leader of the "right sector" Dmitry Yarosh on charges of extremism and is going to put him on the international wanted list. "Law enforcement agencies of our country will check the links between terrorists and members of the North Caucasus" right sector. "If confirmed, our response will be fair and tough. Pronounced prosecuted under Russian law" - quoted Kadyrov ITAR-TASS.
Agency sources in the power structures of the North Caucasus claim that "Ukrainian nationalists fighting with extremists, providing them financial and other assistance and support," the last 10-12 years. To date, most of the channels was neutralized.
Recall Ukrainian radical organization "Right sector" on Sunday night allegedly issued an appeal to the Chechen terrorist Doku Umarov. Shortly press service organization stated that the treatment head of the "right sector" Dmitry Yarosh, which called for "up in arms to support the anti-Russian forces in Ukraine," appeared as a result of hacking unknown account at the event page in the social network "VKontakte".
- The Russian media are asked not to inflame the conflict between Russia and Ukraine
"Recipe Rodnina , "as he called disavowal treatment Jarosz "Moskovsky Komsomolets" , was undertaken after Kadyrov promised to write nationalist leader "one-way ticket." "Words Dmitry Yarosh that fought in Chechnya, we will not leave without attention. Doku Umarov with us went to where no one has yet returned. We write the ticket there and Yarosh," - said the head of Chechnya on his page on Instagram , reacting to appeal to Umarov.
As recalled by the MC, Kadyrov has repeatedly accused that he destroys his enemies not only on the territory of Chechnya and Russia.
"Later, they realized it, the terrorists first approached for help, then began to deny his appeal. Now let responsible for their illegal actions and statements, the time of reckoning has come," - said Kadyrov and assured that in Chechnya, "tens of thousands of volunteers" ready "to stand to protect the Ukrainian people "from radicals with Maidana.
"If need be, I am ready to go to Ukraine together with the volunteers who are willing to protect the population" - quoted Kadyrov Monday press service of the government and Chechnya .
Sam Yarosh, writes UNN , obsessed with creating their organization cells in all regions of Ukraine, called for the mobilization and promised to participate in the "liberation of the Crimea."
Note that the question of whether alive Doku Umarov, remains open. In January Kadyrov once again reported on the Elimination of "rat named Doc". But intelligence agencies this information again not confirmed.
TFR sued the leader of the "right sector"
Meanwhile, on Monday, it was announced that the Central Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiated a criminal case against the head of the ultranationalist Ukrainian organization "Right sector" Dmitry Yarosh of offenses under Part 2 of Art. 205.2 of the Criminal Code and Part 2 of Art. 280 of the Criminal Code (public calls for terrorist and extremist activities conducted through the media).
According to investigation, in their speeches Yarosh publicly calls anti-Russian forces to extremist actions and terror in Russia, said on its website the TFR .
In the near future the investigation is going to apply for absentee election concerning Yarosha remand in custody. Then the leader of the "right sector" will be announced in the international search, the report says.

http://translate.google.com/translate?de...dyrov.html

[Lauren Johnson]

http://jungle-drum.de/download-archiv/willy-wimmer.mp3