Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:I think Charles bashes people with it to make up for his own personal lack of technical ability to argue abstract evidence. That said, I still respect both Charles's wit and his model.
I also think Charles makes the mistake of missing CIA's majority involvement in the conspiracy - Evica model not withstanding.
I think he's bat sh*t crazy, but that's just my opinion.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:I think Charles bashes people with it to make up for his own personal lack of technical ability to argue abstract evidence. That said, I still respect both Charles's wit and his model.
I also think Charles makes the mistake of missing CIA's majority involvement in the conspiracy - Evica model not withstanding.
I think he's bat sh*t crazy, but that's just my opinion.
Please folks, CD is not here, and will not ever be here, so please refrain from discussing him.
Merci. Carry on.
Posts: 901
Threads: 61
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
I see lots of personal attacks, dubious assertions and straw man arguments here but very little substance.
If a person is acting in good faith to establish the truth in a given situation then they should put personal feelings aside and utilise the best tools available to them to achieve that goal. Sacrificing logic and intellectual rigour for the sake of petty point-scoring and internecine conflict is the kind of behaviour which keeps a research community in a state of stagnation for over 50 years.
That is (probably) the last comment I have to make on the subject.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
