Posts: 401
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Scott,
It is not possible to take you seriously, or at your word, or your ability to weigh and prioritize information.
Anyone reading this thread quickly understands these shortcoming of yours, and that they are a result of
your attitude and abilities. Your attitude is plain, your abilities are in doubt and you've offered some excuses but
you show no willingness to make allowances for deficiencies in your abilities, only demands.
You indicate you do not recognize primary sources when they are presented to you repeatedly. Instead you react by
calling them forgeries. You indicate you will say and post anything to avoid admitting you are mistaken.
You have a chip on your shoulder and show no respect for accuracy, or for the honest research of others placed
right under your nose for your consideration. Why are you attempting to participate on forums?
I posted this for you to read more than four years ago. I see no personal development, Scott. You may have been more
coherent in 2011 than you indicate, this week. Your biggest discernible accomplishment is doubling down on avoidance.
If you were sitting across a table from me and you were bleeding profusely, I would urge you to stop avoiding immediate
medical treatment. I urge you now to immediately stop avoiding other serious but possibly treatable health issues.
They continue to overwhelm you..... as they did in October, 2011. The last thing you should be doing is attempting to author
books until you recognize attempted authorship and forum "participation," are avoidance methods, not growth attempts.
Pursue solutions to your personal issues and then decide if you have a compelling book rewrite "in you," that will be of
interest to a sizeable number of other readers. For the last five years, you've projected on forums that you are an issue
plagued interruption and I am sure you want to be and could be more of a presence than that. Do the work to make it
happen. It cannot be more difficult, or embarrassing than what you have been projecting through avoidance of dealing with
your important personal challenges.
Quote:http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....7&p=237031
Posted 27 October 2011 - 11:34 PM
.......
Scott,
I posted the portion of the forum rules I thought you needed to read because I was trying to help you conform and to benefit from the advice Greg and Jim have been trying to give you. Unfortunately you reply mostly as if you are being attacked. There are not all that many active posters here. Why not do the reading to get a better sense of who we are and what we have posted? You post so often as if it were your first day as a member of this forum.
......
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Tom Scully Wrote:Scott,
It is not possible to take you seriously, or at your word, or your ability to weigh and prioritize information.
Anyone reading this thread quickly understands these shortcoming of yours, and that they are a result of
your attitude and abilities. Your attitude is plain, your abilities are in doubt and you've offered some excuses but
you show no willingness to make allowances for deficiencies in your abilities, only demands.
You indicate you do not recognize primary sources when they are presented to you repeatedly. Instead you react by
calling them forgeries. You indicate you will say and post anything to avoid admitting you are mistaken.
You have a chip on your shoulder and show no respect for accuracy, or for the honest research of others placed
right under your nose for your consideration. Why are you attempting to participate on forums?
I posted this for you to read more than four years ago. I see no personal development, Scott. You may have been more
coherent in 2011 than you indicate, this week. Your biggest discernible accomplishment is doubling down on avoidance.
If you were sitting across a table from me and you were bleeding profusely, I would urge you to stop avoiding immediate
medical treatment. I urge you now to immediately stop avoiding other serious but possibly treatable health issues.
They continue to overwhelm you..... as they did in October, 2011. The last thing you should be doing is attempting to author
books until you recognize attempted authorship and forum "participation," are avoidance methods, not growth attempts.
Pursue solutions to your personal issues and then decide if you have a compelling book rewrite "in you," that will be of
interest to a sizeable number of other readers. For the last five years, you've projected on forums that you are an issue
plagued interruption and I am sure you want to be and could be more of a presence than that. Do the work to make it
happen. It cannot be more difficult, or embarrassing than what you have been projecting through avoidance of dealing with
your important personal challenges.
Quote:http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....7&p=237031
Posted 27 October 2011 - 11:34 PM
.......
Scott,
I posted the portion of the forum rules I thought you needed to read because I was trying to help you conform and to benefit from the advice Greg and Jim have been trying to give you. Unfortunately you reply mostly as if you are being attacked. There are not all that many active posters here. Why not do the reading to get a better sense of who we are and what we have posted? You post so often as if it were your first day as a member of this forum.
......
Tom, I don't believe you know me well enough to judge me. I remember a time thinking back to a conversation I had with Larry Hancock, we were going though our regular email exchanges and I was trying to explain something to him, as time went on I believe he took a different view as to what it was I was telling him, and although it took awhile, he said something to me that has stuck with me till this day. He said, Scott, sometimes you just have to pull me in before I consider it.
Well, that has stuck with me, and the funny thing is, today, I just posted this on Facebook. " Sometimes, just coming right out and saying something doesn't always work, you have to pull people in, bait the hook, real in the line little by little, until there's no line left, then drop the net. Perhaps, it's the only way for some folks to understand."
So, before you start to judge me Tom, take a minute and think about that.
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Quote:you think JFK was killed by a tiny conspiracy of Cuban exiles and rogue CIA people
I don't think, I don't believe, I know. And, it is because of the "overwhelming evidence" my father had he was killed over, and it was because some of the information he left behind as well as the backdoor sessions he had with Liebengood including Watergate as well as assassination plots on Nixon that didn't lead me to believe what my father had was very damaging to the company regarding Kennedy's assassination. No Tracy, that's not what lead me to "believe" it's what lead me to the truth.
You can believe what you wish but on this you are totally wrong on this. And I don't waste my time arguing with people who refuse to do serious research.
This just may not be the forum for you Scott.
Dawn
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
10-03-2016, 06:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2016, 06:22 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:Quote:you think JFK was killed by a tiny conspiracy of Cuban exiles and rogue CIA people
I don't think, I don't believe, I know. And, it is because of the "overwhelming evidence" my father had he was killed over, and it was because some of the information he left behind as well as the backdoor sessions he had with Liebengood including Watergate as well as assassination plots on Nixon that didn't lead me to believe what my father had was very damaging to the company regarding Kennedy's assassination. No Tracy, that's not what lead me to "believe" it's what lead me to the truth.
You can believe what you wish but on this you are totally wrong on this. And I don't waste my time arguing with people who refuse to do serious research.
This just may not be the forum for you Scott.
Dawn
Dawn, rather then wasting your time arguing with me, why not instead use some of that serious research of yours and prove me wrong?
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
It tickles my fancy Dawn to think how you ended up here.
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
If there will be no one else who's willing to take anymore potshots at me, I would assume this thread can now be closed, unless there's someone out there who decides we should continue these little charades, then the abuse shall continue.
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 253
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
Scott Kaiser Wrote:It tickles my fancy Dawn to think how you ended up here.
She's one of the founding members of the forum, Scott.
Let me ask you something - what other books about the JFK assassination have you read? What other researchers do you respect and admire? I can't see inside your book on Amazon, so I can't tell much about it (index, bibliography, etc).
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:It tickles my fancy Dawn to think how you ended up here.
She's one of the founding members of the forum, Scott.
Let me ask you something - what other books about the JFK assassination have you read? What other researchers do you respect and admire? I can't see inside your book on Amazon, so I can't tell much about it (index, bibliography, etc).
Before I answer your question Tracy, answer me this, is this really suppose to be about other books and researchers, and how everyone else perceives Kennedy's assassination or what I can prove?
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
And, I will tell you that although, those folks who provided some nice reviews are nice people who may have learned something new, however, I would say do not buy that book as it is missing a ton of information, poorly chopped up and butchered.
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 253
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:It tickles my fancy Dawn to think how you ended up here.
She's one of the founding members of the forum, Scott.
Let me ask you something - what other books about the JFK assassination have you read? What other researchers do you respect and admire? I can't see inside your book on Amazon, so I can't tell much about it (index, bibliography, etc).
Before I answer your question Tracy, answer me this, is this really suppose to be about other books and researchers, and how everyone else perceives Kennedy's assassination or what I can prove?
Scott, my dad worked at Lockheed's Skunk Works in the 1960s on the SR-71. I could tell you stories about that, but does it make me an expert on spy planes and the Cold War? No.
So, I'm trying to establish how much other research you've done on the JFK assassination to see if you've tried to fit your dad's experiences into a larger framework.
|
