Countering Hillary's Coup With a Counter Coup - or Not?

[Lauren Johnson]

It is wonderful that people within them are supportive of freedom. But the CIA, FBI, Pentagon, etc., don't actually work for the people in the US. At the top levels, they seem to work for the private banking interests that have installed and organized them and are pursuing a greater globalism that likely includes the destruction of the US.

As problematic as the above article, it does make one good point. The three letter agencies are not here to save us. Pieczenik would have us believe otherwise, and even make us want to be saved by a coup, which may be the ultimate goal.

Further, we should wonder about the onslaught of the anti-Clinton PR campaign and who is organizing it and what are the agendas? Whatever happened to thinking in terms of Hegelian dialectic. We must remember the Clinton's have been sock puppets for the CIA. We should remember how Bill Clinton came into the presidency under intense scrutiny. It just got worse until he was acquitted in the Senate trial. Clinton's moral and legal troubles led to the GWB presidency. A Clinton presidency could well serve a similar agenda.

We have to look at Assange with some skepticism. He has been charged as being a CIA construct in a MK/ULTRA program (which David Guyatt shot down at least as a Monarch victim). BUT I personally have to wonder how vital Assange leaks serve the purpose of narrative formation.

Here is an interview by John Young of Cryptome.org.