Here’s What Happens If Hillary Wins…

[Garry McNeil]

At an event in Davos, Switzerland on Friday, Larry Summers gave you a glimpse of how regressive a Hillary Clinton presidency will be…
Regular readers are familiar with Summers…
He's the former Treasury Secretary and Clinton crony who's first in line to return to his former post at Treasury if Hillary is anointed on Tuesday.
The last time we caught up with Summers he was mindlessly proposing that the government should buy stocks to artificially boost the stock market and economy.
Not content with the government taking ownership over large swaths of the stock market, Summers is now taking his "government as the supreme father" fantasies one step further…
Have Faith in Government
Summers' next big idea is that central banks such as the Federal Reserve should no longer be independent from national governments.
In his perverted worldview, central bankers should work hand-in-hand with politicians to engineer monetary policy.
Let that sink in for a moment…
The strongest argument for an independent Federal Reserve is based on the principle that subjecting the Fed to direct political influence would lead to a lethal inflationary bias in monetary policy.
And it's easy to see why…
Weasel politicians are driven by their short-term need to win the next election.
That means critical long-term monetary objectives, like stable price levels, would be immediately tossed out the window for the sake of political self-interest.
Look, does anyone really believe that a Federal Reserve under the direct control of the President or one political party in power wouldn't leave rates low to juice the stock market and economy in an election year?
Shoot, left-wing Fed chair Janet Yellen arguably made that happen this year when the Fed is supposedly independent.
Plus, putting the Fed under political control means that it can be misused to facilitate Treasury financing of massive budget deficits by its purchases of Treasury bonds.
So why does Summers think this will work now?
With a straight face, he argues that Fed independence was required in the 1970s and 1980s because back then the White House and Congress could not be trusted to fight inflation.
Apparently today, politicians are so much more trustworthy and responsible. (Cough.)
Does he really think he can sell this drivel to the masses? "Yes" is the short answer.
President Clinton Version 2.0
Look, the idea that Fed has complete independence from the federal government as of right now is completely absurd.
The Fed Board is appointed by the President. The Fed chair must periodically report to Congress. The Fed is subject to political pressures already.
But thankfully, the President nor Congress has any direct involvement with or veto power over interest rate decisions.
So why would anyone propose granting politicians more power to wreak havoc on the U.S. economy?
Well, it makes perfect sense to central planners like Clinton and Summers. These people have one clear objective: amass huge personal fortunes. Consolidation of power gets them richer quicker.
The more power they control… the richer they become.
Because after all, this no longer has anything to do with what is good for the people. Wikileaks has laid bare their real motivations.
They will control more levers of power and their dominance will grow even stronger.
It's a win/win for them, lose/lose for youeven if you don't know it yet.
So through government trading the stock market with your tax dollars and by Clinton manipulating monetary policy to increase and consolidate her power… these are the policy mandates coming your way with President Clinton Version 2.0.
Enjoy the ride. You can't stop it.

Source

[Peter Lemkin]

The Psychopathology of Donald Trump
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_..._20160731/
Posted on Jul 31, 2016
By Bill Blum


Does Donald Trump only say crazy things, or does he say crazy things because he actually is
crazy? In a speech delivered on the third day of the Democratic National Convention, former
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg openly questioned the GOP candidate's sanity
(http://www.vox.com/2016/7/27/12306214/mi...convention) on
prime-time television.
More importantly, if less sensationally, the issue of Trump's emotional stability has also been
raised by a growing number of influential and highly respected mental-health practitioners.
They have done so out of a sense of urgency, even in the face of a code of conduct
(http://www.jaapl.org/content/44/2/226.full) promulgated by the American Psychiatric Association
that cautions psychiatrists against making public statements about public figures whom they
have not formally evaluated.
Ordinarily, as someone licensed to practice law rather than psychology, I'd stay out of the debate
and remain in my comfort zone of traditional legal and political commentary, committed to
exposing the policy shortcomings of both major-party candidates and their surrogates. But
Donald Trump has secured the GOP nod for president. He's one election away from being the
commander in chief of the most powerful nation the planet has ever seen. As such, he, like
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, deserves heightened scrutiny, both as to policy
and personality.


This column is about Trump. There will be future ones on Clinton. And here's my take, with no
punches pulled: If Trump is elected our 45th president, he could well be the most profoundly
disturbed occupant of the Oval Office since Richard Nixon, our 37th, whose extreme paranoia
(http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=1509) brought us Watergate and precipitated the
most far-reaching constitutional crisis of the late 20th century.
Some readers, particularly on the progressive left who by orientation are predisposed to policy
critiques, may not be comfortable with my approach. Some may even ask if it isn't a waste of
time to examine the psyche of a president or a presidential hopeful, noting that even a paranoid
Nixon agreed to end the Vietnam War and opened the door to normalized relations with China.
So why not just stick to policy?
To such doubters, I would say that few people, including world leaders, rarely represent pure evil
or insanity. Most are capable of the occasional act of goodness or kindness or wisdom, even if by
accident. But to gain a more complete understanding of any personespecially someone on the
national stage, who once in office will be subject to the external pressures of social and political
movements and public opinion and be responsible for the well-being of millionsa more
nuanced and dialectical methodology is required that takes account of both the objective and
subjective realms of human interaction.
So comfort be damned. As we head for the general election in November, when it comes to the
former reality-TV show host, I'm not going to be content to focus simply on what the Republican
standard-bearer has to say about Mexican rapists, building a wall, Fox News' Megyn Kelly
"bleeding from her whatever," New Jersey Muslims cheering the fall of the World Trade Towers,
being the "only one" who can save America from chaos, crime and radical Islamic terrorism, or
any of the other abject falsehoods, outbursts and calumnies he's uttered or tweeted.
I've decided to probe the why behind such seeming lunacy. To do that, I've done something
positively un-Trumpian: I've consulted the experts and dug deeply into the public record.
Here's what I've found thus far:
The Diagnosis
A consensus has emerged that Trump suffers from narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
Unless you've tuned out of politics completely in this election year, you've no doubt heard the
word "narcissist" bandied about in connection with Trump, along with labels like "bombastic,"
"hyperbolic" and "politically incorrect," and criticisms that he lacks the temperament and
judgment to be president.
But NPD is more than a label, or a momentary mood or affect. It's a sickness.
The Mayo Clinic, in a website entry (http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-condi...rsonality-
disorder/basics/symptoms/con-20025568) posted before Trump's current presidential
bid was a twinkle in anyone's eye or a nightmare in anyone's mind, defines it thusly:
Narcissistic personality disorder is one of several types of personality disorders.
Personality disorders are conditions in which people have traits that cause them to
feel and behave in socially distressing ways, limiting their ability to function in
relationships and other areas of their life, such as work or school.
If you have narcissistic personality disorder, you may come across as conceited,
boastful or pretentious. You often monopolize conversations. You may belittle or look
down on people you perceive as inferior. You may feel a sense of entitlementand
when you don't receive special treatment, you may become impatient or angry. You
may insist on having the best' of everythingfor instance, the best car, athletic club
or medical care.
At the same time, you have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as
criticism. You may have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and


humiliation. To feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and try to belittle
the other person to make yourself appear superior. Or you may feel depressed and
moody because you fall short of perfection.
Many experts use the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (DSM-5), published by the American Psychiatric Association, to diagnose
mental conditions. This manual is also used by insurance companies to reimburse for
treatment.
DSM-5 criteria for narcissistic personality disorder include these features:
● Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance.
● Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it.
● Exaggerating your achievements and talents.
● Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the
perfect mate.
● Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with
equally special people.
● Requiring constant admiration.
● Having a sense of entitlement.
● Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations.
● Taking advantage of others to get what you want.
● Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others.
● Being envious of others and believing others envy you.
● Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner.
Although some features of narcissistic personality disorder may seem like having
confidence, it's not the same. Narcissistic personality disorder crosses the border of
healthy confidence into thinking so highly of yourself that you put yourself on a
pedestal and value yourself more than you value others.
In a Vanity Fair article published (http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/11/d...arcissism-
therapists) in November, a group of six mental health professionals weighed in on the
subject of Trump's narcissism and gave the diagnosis an unequivocal thumbs-up. One
interviewee, a clinical psychologist who lectures on manipulative behavior, went so far as to say
of Trump: "He's so classic that I'm archiving video clips of him to use in workshops because
there's no better example. … Otherwise, I would have had to hire actors and write vignettes. He's
like a dream come true."
But identifying Trump as an NPD sufferer is only the first step toward inventorying his
personality. Not all versions of NPD are the same.
To some commentatorslay and expert alike, including, most recently, Libertarian Party vice
presidential candidate William Weld (http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/2016/07
/william_weld_dubs_donald_trump_a_malignant_narcissist) Trump presents as a "malignant"
narcissist, commonly described (http://psychologia.co/malignant-narcissism/) as someone who
mixes a blend of narcissism, antisocial personality disorder, aggression, lack of empathy and
sadism.
Malignant narcissists take special pleasure in the humiliation of others, often in response to
perceived threats and disparagements. They frequently respond with over-the-top vitriol of their
own.
The New York Times keeps a running tab on Trump's verbal abuse in a feature
(http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/....html?_r=0)
titled "The 250 People, Places, and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete
List." Psychologically speaking, many of Trump's barbs appear to be a form of "projection," a
primitive defense mechanism (https://artistresearcher.wordpress.com/2...hological-
projection/) long ago identified by Sigmund Freud, whereby a person ascribes
negative feelings about themselves to others. A good exampleas a projection of Trump's own
racismmight be his bizarre allegation that federal Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who is presiding over


the Trump University litigation in San Diego, is biased against him because of his Mexican
heritage.
Other experts see Trump as more of a "thin-skinned" narcissistone who, because of severe
insecurity, is easily insulted, easily hurt and lashes out at perceived enemies in order to receive
reassurance and affirmation from supporters. Among those who espouse the thin-skinned
assessment is Justin Frank (http://www.obamaonthecouch.com/blog/) , a Washington, D.C.-based
psychiatrist and psychoanalyst and a professor at George Washington University. Frank is also
the author of two popular profiles (https://www.amazon.com/Obama-Couch-Insid...-President
/dp/1451620640/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1469816738&sr=1-1) on our last two presidents
"Bush on the Couch" and "Obama on the Couch."
Frank, who has never treated Bush, Obama or Trump, explained how he goes about his trade,
utilizing the techniques of "applied psychoanalysis," in an hour-long interview
(https://www.peterbcollins.com/2016/03/22...s-trumpon-
his-couch/) in March with San Francisco radio host Peter Collins.
"I look for patterns and do a lot of careful study," Frank told Collins. "I look for what pops up
over and over again to really understand people. Trump is a piece of work as a person."
Trump's narcissism, Frank continued, also combines with elements of other traits, such as
paranoia, an inability to process facts, and attention-deficit disorder. Referring to Trump's loopy
boast that he consults primarily with himself on foreign affairs (http://www.politico.com/blogs
/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/trump-foreign-policy-adviser-220853) , Frank
remarked, "He's not interested in hiring anybody smarter than himself because there isn't
anybody, and he's paranoid enough that he wouldn't want anybody smarter."
Regarding the GOP candidate's thought processes and unwillingness to admit to making any
mistakes, Frank said, "Trump takes a preconception [for example, that Mexican rapists are
streaming across the border] and turns it into an absolute fact, whereas most people have
experiences that can change their preconception into a new conception. You can't argue with a
narcissistic person [like him] on content."
In Frank's view, Trump's limited vocabularyhis overuse use of words like "amazing," "huge"
and "winner" to describe himself, and terms like "loser" and "disgusting" to smear his foesis
typical of youngsters struggling with ADD and lack of impulse control. Like such children, he
added, Trump engages in the "childlike quality" of "magical thinking" when it comes to his policy
proposals. The fact that his proposals lack detail or make no objective sense is of little
consequence, because his programs will be "great," as if wishing will make it so.
Frank departs, however, from other observers on the question of whether Trump is a
pathological liar. Because of his magical, childlike thinking, "Trump actually believes what he
says at the moment," Frank maintained. "He lives in digital, not analog time. He doesn't think
about what he said an hour ago."
Liar or not, the end result is someone entirely unsuitable for high office. "He has the brains of a
big man, but the maturity of an 8-year-old," Frank said, summing up. "And those people are very
dangerous potentially."
The Experience of Tony Schwartz and the Art of the Deal
If Trump, who is 70 years old, in fact has NPD, the malady should have shown up long before his
current presidential run.
From all appearances, it did. Just ask Tony Schwartz, the co-author of Trump's signature
memoir, "The Art of the Deal (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0394555287
/ref=dp_proddesc_1?_encoding=UTF8&n=283155) ," originally released by Random House in 1987.
No other piece of publicity did more than this book to catapult Trump into the limelight as a
world-class celebrity, endowing him with the glittering image of the consummate, swashbuckling
deal-maker, who always walks away from high-stakes negotiations richer and stronger than


anyone else.
Schwartz first came to Trump's notice after writing an exposé for New York magazine in 1985
about the real estate mogul's protracted battle to evict a group of rent-controlled tenants from a
building he had purchased and planned to redevelop on Manhattan's Central Park South.
Although the article was extremely unflattering, the magazine pasted his photo on the cover. The
resulting publicity was enough for Trump to seek out Schwartz and offer him a lucrative deal to
ghostwrite his life story.
Although the ensuing collaboration netted Schwartz a half-million-dollar advance and copious
royalties, Schwartz has regretted the undertaking ever since. "I put lipstick on a pig," he
confessed to New Yorker staff writer Jane Mayer in a tell-all interview published in late July.
Schwartz told Mayer, in sum and substance, that the best-selling book is a fraud, much like its
subject. Instead of a "charmingly brash entrepreneur with an unfailing knack for business," as
depicted in the book, Trump, said Schwartz, is a human "black hole," a man with no real friends,
fixated on publicity, motivated by "gaudy, tacky, gigantic obsessions," with "an absolute lack of
interest in anything beyond power and money."
As Trump's presidential bid gained traction, Schwartz decided to go public with his misgivings.
"I feel a deep sense of remorse that I contributed to presenting Trump in a way that brought him
wider attention and made him more appealing than he is," he said. "I genuinely believe that if
Trump wins and gets the nuclear codes there is an excellent possibility it will lead to the end of
civilization."
Schwartz also told Mayer that he kept a diary of his dealings with Trump over the 18 months that
he tagged along with him to business meetings and listened in on phone conversations to acquire
material for the book. From those notes and his recollection, he explained, in terms strikingly
similar to the Mayo Clinic's description of NPD and standard definitions of ADD, that Trump
"was like a kindergartner who can't sit still in a classroom. It was impossible to keep him focused
on any topic, other than his own self-aggrandizement."
Schwartz related that Trump spoke to him, much as he does on the campaign trail, in "cryptic,
monosyllabic statements." His short attention span left Trump, in Schwartz's view, with "a
stunning level of superficial knowledge and plain ignorance. … If he had to be briefed on a crisis
in the Situation Room, it's impossible to imagine him paying attention over a long period of
time."
Equally worrying from a public-interest standpoint, according to Schwartz, was the way Trump
was always "playing people," easily segueing from "flattery" to "bullying."
Even worseand here, there is a slight variance from Dr. Frank's analysiswas Trump's
dishonesty. "Lying is second nature to him," Schwartz said to Mayer. "More than anyone else I
have ever met, Trump has the ability to convince himself that whatever he is saying at any given
moment is true, or sort of true, or ought to be true." When confronted with contrary evidence,
Schwartz elaborated, Trump would "double-down, repeat himself, and grow belligerent."
In keeping with that belligerence, Trump has responded to Schwartz's revelations with a ceaseand-
desist letter penned (http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/...eatensthe-
ghostwriter-of-the-art-of-the-deal) by the chief legal officer of the Trump Organization,
demanding that Schwartz stop giving interviews about his experiences writing "The Art of the
Deal" and forfeit all royalties. Schwartz has hired an attorney to defend himself.
The Mass Psychology of Fascism
Understanding Trump's personal pathology is essential to any assessment of his fitness for
office. But understanding the GOP nominee is only part of the task of combating his presidential
aspirations. To fully comprehend Trump and the social and political dangers he represents, it's
necessary to understand the appeal he has for millions of his core supporters.


To be sure, there are some legitimate reasons that explain why some have embraced Trump: The
uneven economic recovery that has left large swaths of the working and middle classes behind is
one. Another is the failure of neoliberalism, represented by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic
leadership, which appears to many as a corrupt philosophy of governance incapable of
addressing genuine popular needs. There are also some open, obvious and unsavory reasons for
Trump's popularity, rooted in racism and ethnic nationalism, as exemplified by his racially
tinged campaign slogan, aimed mainly at disaffected blue-collar whites, to "Make America Great
Again."
But at the same time, there is something percolating underneath the surface at an unconscious
level beyond economic distress, racism and social nostalgia that keeps a candidate who should
be consigned to the margins of political life in the thick of the presidential race. What is it that
explains the allure that a TV strongman, a clone, some say, of Benito Mussolini, holds for broad
segments of the working class, who buy into the myth of Trump as an anti-establishment
champion (a "blue-collar billionaire," to quote (http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02
/01/3745100/donald-trump-blue-collar/) his son Eric) when he is in truth precisely the opposite?
The Marxist psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Reich) struggled
to understand a similar question as he tried to come to terms with the rise of Nazism and
Stalinism in the 1930s. The answer, Reich posited in his classic work, "The Mass Psychology of
Fascism," lies with the authoritarian and hierarchical structures of the patriarchal family, the
dominance of the father as moral law-giver and bulwark against external danger. In times of
extreme social stress, dislocation and fear, especially in the absence of viable alternatives, large
numbers instinctively turn to figures of authority for protection, heedless of the disastrous
consequences.
As University of California professor George Lakoff, a specialist in cognitive linguistics,
described the phenomenon in a recent Huffington Post blog (http://www.huffingtonpost.com
/george-lakoff/understanding-trump_b_11144938.html) : "In the strict father family, father knows
best. He knows right from wrong and has the ultimate authority to make sure his children and
his spouse do what he says, which is taken to be what is right. … Fear tends to activate desire for
a strong strict fathernamely, Trump."
A study (http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2...ian-213533)
completed this winter by Matthew McWilliams, a doctoral candidate in political science at the
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, further underscored the authoritarian bent of Trump's
base. In a sampling of 1,800 registered voters across the country and the political spectrum,
McWilliams found that only two variables had a statistically significant bearing on a voter's
preference for Trump: authoritarianism, followed by fear of terrorism.
Northwestern University psychology professor Dan P. McAdams also explored the authoritarian
strain among Trump supporters in The Atlantic magazine's June cover cover story
(http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arch...mp/480771/) .
And therein lies the rub for the rest of us. In Donald Trump, one of our two major parties has
nominated for the highest office in the land a deeply troubled and volatile man with the potential
to attract and unleash the darkest undercurrents of the nation's soul. However you decide to vote
come November, you can't in good conscience help to elect him.
Truthdig - The Psychopathology of Donald Trump http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/the...of_donald_...

[R.K. Locke]

Dark times ahead whichever way you look at it. Truly a tragic moment for humanity.

[Peter Lemkin]

Dark times ahead whichever way you look at it. Truly a tragic moment for humanity.

I'll second that notion. The most powerful [and aggressive] nation will soon be led by someone dangerous and only interested in power for themselves and/or those who helped them get above the 'fray' of the lumpen proletariat. While I believe the course things would take will be very different [in most ways, not all] between one or the other 'major party candidate', either one will lead to very many bad things. One has to hope we can somehow avoid disaster in four years and get rid of them. It is my belief that if Trump looses, he won't concede and will contest for a long while - some of his gun toting faithful might make things very frightening indeed. If he looses, I also see the Republican Party slitting into two parties - a good thing. I wish the Democratic Party would do the same thing. More and smaller parties - and eventually getting rid of the Electoral College and having some kind of proportional representation is the only way to save the US in something like its current form...but I don't think that kind of change is really possible. So, the collapse will go on - as will more wars externally and more repression on and spying upon the citizenry. I know I won't be cheering no matter what happens tonight. The only thing that could life my spirits would be a high vote for Jill Stein and some of the state ballot initiatives for sane improvements. Neither winner will have it easy from the men behind the curtains, as they both have enemies and supporters there - so that internecine war, along with a dysfunctional Congress will lead to very bad things out of their control. The raping of the citizenry of their money, jobs, homes, civil liberties, health, freedoms and lives will continue apace under either neocon. The Empire in its dying days [years or a few decades, in fact] will seek to extend itself further until it implodes - but I don't think the endgame will be a pretty one internally nor externally. Averting a total Global environmental and nuclear disaster will not be easy. Yes, we are exceptional......

[Peter Lemkin]

"If voting really changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman

[Cliff Varnell]

"If voting really changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman

Republican governors and legislatures have made it illegal for millions of minorities to vote. Voter ID laws, poll closings, forbidding the black church tradition of voting on the Sunday before the election, scrubbing the voter rolls for arbitrary reasons.

The GOP will do anything to prevent Democrats from voting -- so it must do some good!

Net neutrality, same-sex marriage, the 2015 roll-back of NSA bulk collection of electronic transmissions, the diplomatic opening to Cuba, the Iranian nuke deal.

Thanks Obama!

(No thanks for the drone war, the Ukraine mess, the crackdown on whistleblowers.)

[Peter Lemkin]

While the final curtain has not fallen, as I write [here in the relative safety of Europe], I see my nation imploding and on the brink of electing Trump. This would unleash the Police to kill more non-whites and the military to do whatever it wants in the country and without. I'm disgusted if this trend holds in the next hours - of selecting the worst of two evils. Rascism is the main factor, followed by the destruction of the middle class. Sanders could easily have beaten Trump - but the men behind the curtain didn't want a Socialist at any cost. Well, I feel I have lost yet more of my country [and believe me, knowing what I know about Dallas, the Secret Government, the true history of the USA, 911 et al., I already feel I have lost most of my country....that might well be complete if Trump wins]. However, even if Clinton somehow manages to win, my faith in my country has taken yet another step downward and totally in the wrong directions. A very sad day in US and World history!!!

Under a Trump presidency, non-whites, Muslims, non-heterosexual, and all political progressives will all be targets of the Police/National Security State - and women will be put back in a subservient status. I'm sure those who run the secret prisons of the DHS are being swept out about now!......to be filled with those listed above who are not summarily executed by the police, military and soon to be unleashed vigilante groups. ::

This is bigger than Brexit and much on the same lines [we are not leaving the EU - we are leaving the modern World]....a scream against the elites that will cause more harm than good even to the screamers - and I think that some of the elites are behind Trump. Well, it was clear that nothing good could have come out of this...but I have to admit that contemplating the USA with Trump as the President makes the Presidency of W. Bush look like something to wish for - i.e., I'd predict it will be infinitely worse, infinitely more regressive

[Peter Lemkin]

Vote machines audit function disabled
and worse

Greg Palast on the ground in the battleground state of Ohio: where he finds three ways the vote is, indeed, "rigged" but FOR the GOP.

Watch Palast's report for Democracy Now with Amy Goodman.


And, today, Election Day, and tomorrow only, stream Palast's new movie for free, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: a tale of Billionaires & Ballot Bandits.'

[Columbus, Ohio, Election Day 2016.] For two decades, computer touch-screen voting machines have been derided as "push and pray" voting. You had to take it on faith that the machine records your vote as you intend. The machines lacked a "paper record" to audit and recount.
So, voting rights attorney Robert Fitrakis was thrilled to learn that many of Ohio's voting machines would, for this election, have a brand-new anti-hacking capability. The computers could now take a photo of every voter card loaded in, time stamp each marking and keep the images in an order that allows an audit and recount.

But there's one thing wrong with the new tamper-proof voting machines. "They've decided to TURN OFF the security."

What? In 2004, Ohio's "push-and-pray" machines produced suspect tallies that won President George W. Bush's re-election victory over Sen. John Kerryalthough Kerry had a comfortable lead in exit polls. And in this year's contest, the FBI has raised fears of fiddling these machines by Russian hackers.

Yet, the Republican Secretary of State of Ohio, Jon Husted, is allowing county officials to simply turn off these security functionswith no explanation as to why.

The counties, Fitrakis discovered, "bought state-of-the-art equipment and turned off the security," both the ballot imaging function and the audit application that can detect and record evidence of machine tampering.

Fitrakis, Green Party candidate for Franklin County Prosecutor, sought a temporary restraining order to require voting officials to simply turn on the ballot integrity functions on the machines. As a reporter for Democracy Now, I was permitted to observe, though not film, the hearing in the judge's chamber in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in Columbus, Ohio's capital.

Lawyers for the Republican Secretary of State as well as county officials from around the state gave no reason for turning off the ballot protection functions on the machines. Instead, they pleaded that turning them on "would cause havoc."

Fitrakis, armed with a copy of the machine's instructions noted that the "havoc" was no more than clicking on a drop-down computer menu and choosing "record" images instead of "do not record." The menu has a similar yes/no option for the audit application.

Nevertheless, Judge David Cain, a Republican, ruled that Fitrakis' demand was "borderline frivolous." Counsel for the state's GOP Attorney General argued, successfully, that Fitrakis would have to return after the election and prove the election was stolen. Of course, he'd have no audit trail nor ballot images with which to make the case.

Fitrakis told me, "It's Catch-22. It's Ohio."

And the stakes are high. This is the ultimate swing state that could decide not only the Presidency but the balance in the US Senate.

Long Lines for Black Votes; Zero Lines for whites
On Sunday, I joined the members of the Freedom Faith Missionary Baptist Church of Dayton for early voting. All over Ohio, churches bus the faithful to the polls for early voting. Nearly 70% of Ohio's African-Americans vote on "Souls-to-the-Polls" Sunday as many do not have the transport nor the day off to vote on Tuesday.

They arrived at the one and only early polling station and waited. And waited. And waited. And waited. The lines for several thousand voters at the one poll snaked up and down three floors of the county building and spiraled through the multi-story garage. At the end of the line they were given numbers to wait in an auditorium to be called to vote.

Yet, today, on Election Day Tuesday, when the majority of white Ohioans vote, there will be 176 polling stations in Montgomery County (Dayton) alone. For many whites the lines are not shortthey are non-existent, with more poll workers than voters.

The system was created by that same GOP official, Jon Husted, who had permitted counties to turn off ballot protection applications on the voting machines. Husted had wanted to eliminate Sunday voting completely.
But Husted ran into resistance. I located Dennis Lieberman, until recently, a Dayton County elections board member. Lieberman told me, "We had voted, both Republicans and Democrats, for long [voting] hours on weekends so that people, like this" he gestured to the church groups could come and vote."

But Secretary Husted was none too pleased.

"After we did that [voted for Saturday and Sunday voting], we were told by the Secretary of State that if we didn't change our vote, that he would fire us."

Lieberman and the others refused to give in. And, as a result, said the voting official, "I got fired."
Secretary Husted has refused several requests for an interview.

The Purge begins of half a million suspected "duplicate" voters
Donald Trump claims that, the election is "rigged"specifically because, "You have people …voting many, many times."

Trump's accusations simply repeats the claim of more than two dozen Republican state voting chiefs who have created a secret list of those suspected of voting twice or registering twice with the intent of voting a second time. Altogether, there are an astonishing 7.2 million names on the GOP blacklist, labeled "Crosscheck" by Republican operatives.

Ohio's Secretary of State has a whopping 497,000 suspects on his list in that one state and he is systematically removing them. Of these, approximately 60,000 Ohioans will find their names simply removed from the swing state's voter rollsand they will have no idea of the accusation against them.
Crucially, the list is racially loadedtagging an astounding one in six voters of color in the GOP states using Crosscheck.

Voting twice is a felony crimeand, despite the humongous list, only one Ohioan has been convicted. Yet thousands are losing their vote.

Although it is "confidential," our team obtained over 100,000 of Ohio's blacklisted voters facing disenfranchisement. We spoke to severaland one, Donald Webster, agreed to speak to us on camera.
Donald Alexander Webster Jr. of Dayton, Ohio, is accused of having registered a second time in Virginia as Donald Eugene Webster Sr.

He claims that he never used the name "Eugene" and he can't imagine why someone would vote a second time when, to fix an election, he would have had to conspire with thousands of others.
So I asked, "Well, do you? Are you part of a large conspiracy?"
"No, no. No I am not, sir."

Yet he and the other Donald Webster are at risk of losing their voteand will not know why.

Rights attorney Fitrakis said of Husted's "Crosscheck" game, "He knows what he's doing is illegal. What he's doing is counting on bigotry to get away with it. He's picking first and last names only because he doesn't want to actually [catch double voters]. He wants to purge Blacks and Hispanics. And he's trying to make Ohio winnable in the only way he knows how: by stealing American citizens' votes."

[Cliff Varnell]

While the final curtain has not fallen, as I write [here in the relative safety of Europe], I see my nation imploding and on the brink of electing Trump.

Congratulations to the Stein and Johnson voters.

May all the children of those who claimed Trump and Clinton were equally evil grow up to be just like Donald Trump.

How did fascism come to America?

Look in the fucking mirror.