Mark Stapleton
Unregistered
John Bevilaqua Wrote:And it was James Richards who first postulated Robert E. Johnson as a shooter, not me.
That's the only point I'm trying to make. You claimed Robert Johnson was a DP shooter as an unequivocal statement of fact. But it isn't a confirmed fact. It's a postulation, a speculation, and I think you're wrong.
As for Robert Maxwell, I stand corrected. Your knowledge of this tangled web of lies exceeds mine by miles. I have no beef with you John, and respect your energy and diligence, whether it turns out to be on target or otherwise.
Wish you would show a bit more respect for Charles Drago though. He's on our side you know.
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Mark Stapleton Wrote:John Bevilaqua Wrote:And it was James Richards who first postulated Robert E. Johnson as a shooter, not me.
That's the only point I'm trying to make. You claimed Robert Johnson was a DP shooter as an unequivocal statement of fact. But it isn't a confirmed fact. It's a postulation, a speculation, and I think you're wrong.
As for Robert Maxwell, I stand corrected. Your knowledge of this tangled web of lies exceeds mine by miles. I have no beef with you John, and respect your energy and diligence, whether it turns out to be on target or otherwise.
Wish you would show a bit more respect for Charles Drago though. He's on
our side you know.
With all due respect Mark- great to see you here by the way and I apologise for the condesending manner in which JB was addressing you- Charlie IS on "our side", but I am not so certain about the "side" or motives of John. You are now the third person here at DPF who I have seen him treat with near contempt. I find both his attitude and theories at the very least troubling.
Dawn