Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CIA covert action in London against trade with Cuba, 1964
Several important concerns of the CIA in the 1960s - and beyond - converge in the piece which follows. Two, in particular, stand out: Cuba had to be kept dependent upon Moscow to sustain its domestic political threat utility; and Britain under Labour had to be kept politically and economically subservient to Washington.

It's also interesting to see how reliant the sophisticated apologia for the CIA's innumerable crimes has come to be upon "they-were-nasty-but-useless" defence. And from the Observer's point of view, how useful such an old and unresolved tale is for deflecting charges of being CIA-subservient.

CIA accused of sabotage in Thames

Naval historian says a Cuba-bound ship with British buses aboard was rammed in 1964 in an American plot

Tracy McVeigh, The Observer, Sunday, 26 October 2008, p.19

Quote:On a chilly October night in 1964, the shipping forecast warned of fog on the Thames. Just after midnight, an East German freighter, the MV Magdeburg, slipped out of her Dagenham dock and headed slowly down river. On deck were 42 Leyland buses bound for Cuba.

Coming the other way was the Yamashiro Maru, a Japanese ship, sailing empty. The ships met at 1.52am. The Magdeburg was making the tight turn around Broadness Point when the Yamashiro Maru ploughed into her starboard side at more than 10 knots, holing her below the waterline and pushing her across the river.

'It was an accident, an act of God,' insisted Keith Toms, a tug crewman on the Thames that night. And that was the conclusion. No one was killed, there was no inquiry, no one was accountable and only Leyland Motors, forced to replace the buses, suffered.

Now a historian has found documents that add weight to the suspicions of academics that the ship was rammed at the behest of the CIA - as part of an effort to sabotage anyone breaking the US embargo on Fidel Castro's Cuba.

With the Americans threatening to blacklist any shipowner breaking the 'transportation blockade', Leyland Motors decided to use an East German ship. It was in the maritime archives of the former German Democratic Republic that John McGarry found evidence given by Gordon Greenfield, the British pilot of the Magdeburg, stating that the Japanese ship broke international law by navigating the wrong way and giving misleading signals. The captain and pilot of the Yamashiro Maru refused to speak.

McGarry believes a crime was committed. 'I felt that the question of CIA involvement might be resolved by an examination of the pilots' logs which were supposed to be stored at Trinity House and in the Port of London Archives. They cannot be found. The East German papers show Greenfield was deceived by someone on the Yamashiro Maru who sounded a single siren blast before the collision, an intention to pass port to port,' he said.

Greenfield said in his statement: 'The Yamashiro Maru appeared to sail towards the south of the middle channel, but I interpreted her exchange of signals to mean that she was about to turn to starboard in order to pass me on her port side. At this time there seemed to be no danger of a collision.'

Tracked down 44 years later, Greenfield said: 'Given the atmosphere of the day, I suppose it's not surprising people read something into what happened but there's no truth in it, there was no blame attached.' He did agree that, despite reports of thick fog, visibility was so good that the two ships could see each other clearly well before Broadness Point.

In 1975, Washington Post reporters Jack Anderson and Les Whitten cited sources who claimed that a British intelligence wiretap on Cuban offices in London gave the CIA the Magdeburg's movements, despite two Prime Ministers, Alec Douglas-Home and Harold Wilson, backing the export deal engineered by Leyland's famed salesman Donald [later Lord] Stokes.

Anderson, a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist, is dead, but Whitten, 80, told The Observer that they had two sources. 'Jack's contacts were in the CIA and my contacts were in the National Security Agency. I don't remember a lot but I do know our sources were pretty good, the best really.'

Harold Elletson, director of the New Security Foundation in Berlin, said: 'It would be naive to think that the CIA wouldn't dare sink an East German ship in the vital estuary of a Nato ally. They were under pressure to get results and they had a huge budget for sabotage. In 1962 the British freighter Newlane was machine-gunned loading Cuban sugar. The CIA poisoned 14,135 bags of Cuban sugar on the British ship Streatham Hill in 1962 in Puerto Rico.'

Douglas-Home backed Leyland and President Lyndon Johnson refused to speak to him. In April 1964, minister Rab Butler was called to see Johnson. 'His reward was a tongue-lashing,' wrote Anthony Howard in the Spectator, 'during which the great, glowering figure behind the desk reached in his pocket to produce a wad of dollar bills which he flourished as he instructed Her Majesty's Britannic Foreign Secretary to come to him in future if his country wanted a cash handout rather than go selling buses to Cuba.'

Anthony Glees, professor of intelligence studies at Buckingham University, said: 'That it was a deliberate sinking doesn't sound entirely implausible. I've a very low estimation of the CIA and its work throughout the Cold War - it's a history of failure. What would have been inconsistent is that they had an operation in the Thames they got away with.'

But perhaps Magdeburg's controversial cargo was a coincidence. Keith Toms, then a 19-year-old deck hand, said: 'It was frightening, a ship like that turning over. I remember people crying out for help. Trinity House, the pilots' union body, was a very powerful body. No one would be castigated. People accepted that accidents happen. It was such a busy river, and even without fog collisions happen in daylight. I was surprised it sank, you wouldn't get enough force in a normal collision.'

Dr Kristian Gustafson, CIA historian at Brunel University, was sceptical: 'What the cousins didn't do was spray in each other's countries. But was America irrational about Cuba? Absolutely. People did crazy things.'

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  LBJ's invasion of Cuba? Jim DiEugenio 2 2,240 19-01-2017, 03:46 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Arnaldo Fernandez on the Latest Oswald/Cuba BS Jim DiEugenio 0 1,595 13-12-2016, 08:54 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Times of London on the CIA revolt against JFK, 1961-1963 Paul Rigby 10 6,973 12-10-2015, 09:34 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  The Invasion of Cuba: Never the Intention of JFK Hit Sponsors Charles Drago 98 32,822 04-11-2013, 09:48 PM
Last Post: Anthony DeFiore
  The Day President Kennedy (Almost) Broke the Embargo on Cuba Bernice Moore 0 1,689 28-09-2011, 04:05 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Cuba in the Crosshairs: A Near Half-Century of Terror Bernice Moore 3 2,547 20-08-2011, 03:30 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Action Alert - Need callers to bash Arlen Specter on Live Philly radio Monday May 17-18th Robert Morrow 0 1,826 16-05-2010, 11:16 PM
Last Post: Robert Morrow
  What is it about World Trade Centers? Jack White 6 4,098 06-01-2009, 07:54 PM
Last Post: David Healy
  Armstrong: Of Covert Ops, Fake Marines, of Classifieds, of Cabbages and Kings Jack White 0 12,378 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  New book of interest - GANGSTERISMO - The US, Cuba and the Mafia, 1933 - 1966 Anthony Thorne 0 1,490 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)