Phone hacking scandal deepens

[Magda Hassan]

Murdoch's Lawyers Turn on Him
Aug 17, 2011 11:36 PM EDT
First came the ex-staff lawyers, and now the London firm Harbottle & Lewis are firing back. Sam Bungey on why the media family needs a true consigliere.

What the Murdochs need right now are some mob lawyers. They should have discreet counsel on how to limit exposure, on what to do and say if they are arrested, and maybe the occasional use of an unbugged room in which to conduct business under the protection of the attorney-client privilege. Instead, what the family is getting is less Corleone consigliere, more Fredo Corleone rat.


The U.K. firm Harbottle & Lewis is leading the charge of lawyers aggressively dropping a dime on News International. Newly released documents in the hacking case show former staff lawyers Jon Chapman and Tom Crone both turning on their former bosses, and the Murdochs must now fear the worst over BCL Burton Copeland, the City firm drafted by their company to conduct a nine-month internal investigation into criminality.

Harbottle has been paid coming and going in the hacking scandal. The firm first advised Prince William and Kate Middleton over the investigation of erstwhile News of the World royals reporter Clive Goodman. The Scotland Yard probe ended in Goodman's imprisonment for hacking the phones of members of the royal household, and with an apology and offer of a substantial donation to charities of Prince William's choosing from News International.

Then Harbottle switched sides, acting for News International over a wrongful-dismissal claim by Goodman in 2007. Goodman's claim rested on the allegation that phone hacking was widespread at News of the World. Harbottle was drafted to refute this and, working with a number of supplied emails, found no evidence of a wider conspiracy to hack phones. Harbottle sent a letter to this effect, which over the next several years News International brandished like O. J. Simpson's leather glove, using it to rebuff reporters and politicians alike.

Photos: Who's Who in News Corp. Scandal

Clockwise from left: Getty Images, AP Photo (2)

Indeed, the company clung to the letter long after a wider conspiracy had been publicly established. At July's dramatic select-committee hearing, the Murdochs once again trotted out the Harbottle opinion, this time using it to defend their decision not to investigate further. James Murdoch even swiped at Harbottle, saying the firm made a "major mistake" in characterizing the hacking as being confined to Goodman.

This week Harbottle forcefully came out against News International. In a letter to the select committee, the firm rejected "News Int's self-serving view of the firm's role in events."


ANDY RAIN

Harbottle stated that it had charged just £10,000 for a "narrow" scope of work that involved only analyzing a series of emails for criminal liability. The investigation was "short, limited in terms of access to documents," and "without any access at all to witnesses."

Rupert Murdoch's characterization of the jobthat Harbottle was brought in "to find out what the hell was going on"was "misleading," the firm added. Twisting the knife further, Harbottle claimed the 2007 letter was never intended for publication, a detail that makes News International look ever more duplicitous.

But Harbottle is not a lone snitcher. News International's former head of corporate and legal affairs, Jon Chapman, has broken ranks too. Chapman was instrumental in marshaling the company's defense in the hacking scandal, helping to set the terms of the internal investigation. But in an Aug. 11 letter to the select committee, Chapman wrote that the testimonies of both Rebekah Brooks, the former News of the World editor and top News International executive, and the two Murdochs contained "serious inaccuracies."

Meanwhile, Tom Crone, former chief lawyer for News of the World, is embroiled in increasingly confrontational correspondence with James Murdoch via the select committee, over Murdoch's claim that Crone and former NotW editor Colin Myler failed to inform him about widespread hacking.

Murdoch has doubled down on statements he made in the hearing, with a written statement insisting that "neither Mr Myler nor Mr Crone told me wrongdoing extended beyond Mr Goodman or [private detective Glenn] Mulcaire." But Crone, in new written evidence, all but accuses his old boss of lying about this.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...g8B8cz7zOy

[Jan Klimkowski]

The Murdoch crime family is totally brazen:

Call for inquiry into News International payments to Andy Coulson

Labour MP Tom Watson wants Electoral Commission to investigate whether payments and benefits to former No 10 communications director amounted to political donations

Andrew Sparrow and Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 23 August 2011 14.57 BST

The Electoral Commission is being asked to investigate whether News International payments to Andy Coulson after he started working for the Conservative party may have broken the law.

Tom Watson, a Labour MP and a member of the Commons culture committee, said he wanted the Electoral Commission to investigate whether the payments and benefits which reportedly included private health insurance and a company car should have been declared because they amounted to a political donation.

MPs on the committee are also angry because the reports appear to contradict evidence given to it by Coulson himself. The former News of the World editor, who worked as David Cameron's communications chief from July 2007 until January this year, is expected to face further questioning from the committee about the payments.

On Monday night, the BBC's Robert Peston said Coulson had received several hundred thousand pounds from News International after he started working for Tories.

Coulson was known to have received a payoff after he resigned from the News of the World in January 2007 following the conviction of the journalist Clive Goodman and the investigator Glenn Mulcaire for phone hacking.

But Peston said Coulson received his severance pay in instalments, and that he continued receiving money from News International until the end of 2007. Peston also said Coulson continued to receive his News International work benefits, such as healthcare, for three years and that he kept his company car.

The report casts doubt on the reliability of the evidence that Coulson gave to the culture committee in 2009. Coulson, who at the time was working for the Conservative party on a reported salary of £275,000 roughly half what he was thought to have been earning at the News of the World said he did not have any "secondary income".

Watson asked: "So your sole income was News International and then your sole income was the Conservative party?" Coulson replied: "Yes."

Rebekah Brooks, the former News International chief executive, appeared to confirm this when she gave evidence to the committee in July. Asked if the company had "subsidised" Coulson's salary after he left the News of the World, she said: "That's not true."

On Tuesday, John Whittingdale, the Conservative MP who chairs the culture committee, said Coulson and News International should have been more open with the committee about the nature of this arrangement.

"As I understand it, these were staggered payments from a severance package. So, arguably, that's just delayed pay," Whittingdale said.

"But if it is also true that Coulson was provided with a car and health insurance, then I would have expected him to have made that clear. And I would have expected News International to have made that clear when we asked them about it."

The committee is not meeting until September, but Whittingdale said it may decide to demand further clarification on these matters from Coulson and News International.

Watson said on Tuesday the committee would have to establish whether it had been "misled".

But he said that the Electoral Commission also had to establish whether the payments and benefits constituted donations to the Conservative party that should have been declared.

"If it transpires that these payments were made in a discretionary fashion, rather than honouring the commitments of Mr Coulson's contract, then I think they probably do form a donation and they should have been declared," he said.

"Every single day there seems to be a new revelation that contradicts what has previously been said. I want the Electoral Commission to try and get to the facts of this case. They have powers of investigation."

Watson also said that Cameron should have been embarrassed to learn that Rupert Murdoch was still paying for Coulson's car and for Coulson's health insurance several years after Coulson started working for the Tories.

"I just pose the question if Alastair Campbell when he was working for Tony Blair had had his car paid and his health insurance paid what would the reaction of the Murdoch papers be?" Watson asked.

The commission said it had not yet received a complaint about the individual allegations and refused to spell out whether such payments might have been considered undeclared donations, directing inquiries to their rules regulating donations.

According to the rules, staff of political parties are not considered regulated donees in their own right unless they are a member of the party and they receive money for use in their political work.

Payments to a member of staff could however be considered a donation in kind to a party if it saved the party paying for items itself. As such, if the payments were in anyway considered a co-payment or top-up to subsidise his party wage it could count as a donation.

Alternatively if the health insurance or company car he reportedly enjoyed for three years after leaving News International subsidised the party paying for such items itself, it could also be considered a donation.

In July, the Conservatives denied Coulson was paid by News International while he was working for the party or the government. A senior Conservative party official told the Guardian: "We can give categorical assurances that he wasn't paid by any other source. Andy Coulson's only salary, his only form of income, came from the party during the years he worked for the party and in government."

Labour's culture spokesman, Ivan Lewis, put out a statement on Tuesday demanding more "transparency" from Cameron and News International.

"David Cameron needs to say whether he knew about the payments to Andy Coulson. The details of Mr Coulson's termination agreements with News International must be published and we need to know whether these payments, in the form of honouring a two-year contract of employment after he had been forced to resign in disgrace, were declared to the parliamentary authorities," Lewis said.

"It must be explained why Mr Coulson was getting these payments when he resigned from the News of the World.

"The longer these questions are unanswered the more damage will be done to the prime minister's reputation."

[Magda Hassan]

Steve Coogan's lawyers are Shillings mmmm....

Private investigator Glenn Mulcaire has revealed the names of the News of the World staff who instructed him to carry out phone hacking, his solicitor has confirmed.

The information was passed in a letter to Steve Coogan's lawyers in accordance with a court order.

Mulcaire had applied for permission to appeal against the order, which was made in February, but this was denied and he was compelled to pass over the details by Friday.

His solicitor, Sarah Webb, from Payne Hicks Beach, said she could not reveal who the NoW employees were because of "confidentiality issues".

Schillings, which is representing Coogan, has agreed not to reveal the names yet, to give Payne Hicks Beach a chance to apply for a court order stopping their release.

Mulcaire was ordered to reveal who instructed him to access Coogan's voicemails, as well as those of celebrities including Max Clifford and Elle Macpherson.

He was jailed for six months in 2007 for intercepting messages left on royal aides' phones.

A spokeswoman for News International said the firm had no comment.

[Magda Hassan]

Video link here
But if you can't see it in your region there is a transcript below.

For more than five years Rupert Murdoch and his most trusted executives told the world that a rogue reporter and a rogue private detective were responsible for hacking phones for the News of the World. Reporter Sarah Ferguson investigates that claim and reveals the links between Murdoch's newspapers and the British criminal world going back two decades.

What do you do when you're a journalist with an editor demanding an exclusive story to put on the front page? At Britain's now defunct News of the World you employed a foul-mouthed private investigator with a criminal record to get you information that would provide you with a scoop.

Phone hacking was a speciality but there were other methods too, including corrupting police who would provide the kind of private information guaranteed to win the reporter a prime spot in the paper.

This week on Four Corners, Sarah Ferguson tells the story of a key private investigator at the heart of the scandals that have set Rupert Murdoch's empire rocking on its axis. Detailing records of police surveillance and interviews with people who had been targeted by the investigator Ferguson pieces together how he worked.

As the investigation unfolds it becomes clear that phone hacking and illegal information theft were not done on behalf of one "rogue" reporter or one newspaper. Instead, the evidence suggests these surveillance activities were being done on an industrial scale - sometimes by people with criminal backgrounds - for anyone who had the cash to pay for it. As Tony Blair's former press secretary, Alastair Campbell, told Four Corners:

"It seems they were in a sense replacing journalists... possibly to cut costs, but the other reason you assume is because it meant the private detectives could do things the journalists can't."

Campbell has good reason to make such a claim. Four Corners has been told by a News insider that the practice of phone hacking and the gathering of illegal information was so widely accepted that at the News of the World competing sections of the paper used different private investigators to do their dirty work.

Meanwhile, News executives stuck to the company line of one rogue reporter. As one British MP puts it:

"You know what they say about lies: if you say it loud enough and often enough people begin to believe it and they nearly got away with it."

One reason they were able to get away with it for so long was that the British police refused to investigate the extent of the potential criminal activity. Why were they reluctant? According to one person who found himself the victim of illicit surveillance, the answer is clear:

"What happened was that the News of the World or News International more generally managed to get its filthy, slimy tentacles in every nook and cranny of the Metropolitan police and to all intents and purpose that corrupted it."

As the British parliament prepares to reopen its hearings, one question resonates throughout the News empire: how far up the corporate ladder did the knowledge and approval to pay for these services go?

'Bad News', presented by Kerry O'Brien, goes to air on Monday 29th August at 8.30pm on ABC1. The program is replayed on Tuesday 30th August at 11.35pm. It can also be seen on ABC News 24 at 8.00pm on Saturdays, on ABC iview and at abc.net.au/4corners.

Transcript

KERRY O'BRIEN, PRESENTER: Welcome to Four Corners.

It may be premature to talk with any certainty of the fall of the House of Murdoch, but the powerful global media dynasty led by patriarch Rupert has never faced a crisis like it, with a yawning credibility gap his News Corporation may find impossible to close while ever the Murdochs remain associated with it.

Tonight we're going to chronicle the extent of the News Corporation nightmare in Britain relating to illegal phone and computer hacking, and bribery of police, for information including salacious gossip for stories on royals, politicians, celebrities and others, which has so far led to 12 arrests including former and current senior executives.

With an army of 120 police now investigating the Murdoch empire's activities in Britain, there is now open conjecture that James Murdoch, son of Rupert and chairman and CEO of News Corporation, may have a case to answer himself.

Revelations of the lengths to which News of the World, the biggest circulation newspaper in Newscorp's global stable, would go to get a story, using unscrupulous private investigators to crack the private data of banks police and government departments, had been building for a decade.

In piecing the picture together for tonight's program, Sarah Ferguson reveals just how ludicrous it was for News Corporation to claim, as it did for so long, that the illegal hacking within News of the World were the work of one rogue journalist and one rogue private investigator.

She also tells of another even more criminally unscrupulous private investigator, and of corrupt practices that had become endemic in Fleet Street culture. Here now is Sarah Ferguson's story.

NEWS REPORTER: Several years ago he was involved in several out of court settlements involving some phone hacking allegations to the fact...

MEDIA COMMENTATOR: Rupert Murdoch, you're a great Australian in the same sense that a killer was a great...

STREET VENDOR (handing out newspapers): Free Standard, free standard, thank you.

(protesters shouting)

SARAH FERGUSON: Throughout its millennial history London has been the stage for great events. It's no stranger to the rise and fall of empires nor to the rise and fall of powerful men.

Today the Houses of Parliament will be the courtroom to try a modern media giant and his teetering empire.

It is the 19 July 2011and Australia's most famous expatriate Rupert Murdoch has truly become the news of the world.

GEOFFREY ROBERTSON QC: There is a kind of twilight of the gods atmosphere at the moment. Scotland Yard is falling; News Limited may crack.

LORD PRESCOTT, DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER 1997-2007: Now he's thinking about how do I save the company…

MICHAEL WOOLFF, BIOGRAPHER OF RUPERT MURDOCH: It's actually well past the beginning of the end; what's happened here fundamentally is just a terrible loss of credibility.

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL, MEDIA ADVISER TO TONY BLAIR 1997-2003: I think that News International and the Murdoch brand has been hugely damaged and I think it'd be very, very hard for them to recover from it.

RUPERT MURDOCH, CHAIRMAN AND CEO OF NEWS CORPORATION: As the founder of the company I was appalled to find out what had happened.

TOM WATSON, LABOUR MP: Looking back on the last month it seems like the parable of the emperor's new clothes, everyone now looks at Rupert Murdoch and recognises his organisation got too powerful.

NEWS REPORTER 2: James is the one most in the spotlight in this because several years ago he was involved in several out of court settlements...

NEWS REPORTER 3: Mr Murdoch, do you have anything you want to say to the victims of the phone hacking?

SARAH FERGUSON: In the twilight of ageing kings and potentates the focus is always on their successors.

Can they measure up to a father's brilliance and to his ruthlessness?

JOHN WHITTINGDALE, CHAIR OF INQUIRY: Could we please remove the people holding up notices?

SARAH FERGUSON: Today is a trial not only of the great man but his anointed successor the Americanised James.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 19 July 2011)

JAMES MURDOCH, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF NEWS CORPORATION EUROPE AND ASIA: Mr Chairman, thank you and first of all I would like to say as well just how sorry I am and how sorry we are, to particularly the victims of illegal voicemail interceptions and to their families. As for my comments Mr Chairman, and my statement, which I believe was around the closure of the News of the World newspaper...

RUPERT MURDOCH: Before you get to that, I would just like to say one sentence. This is the most humble day of my life.

(end of excerpt)

MICHAEL WOOLFF: The parliamentary hearing was very clear what was going on there. This was being run by lawyers, by litigators and they were told you know this is not, this is not about clearing your name, this is not about making people feel better about you, this is not about arguing your case, this is about keeping you out of jail.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 19 July 2011)

PHILIP DAVIES, BRITISH MP: Clive Goodman was pleading guilty to phone hacking, a criminal offence. Did News International pay Clive Goodman's legal fees for his trial?

JAMES MURDOCH: I was not, I do want to be clear about the chronology. First, I do not have first-hand knowledge of those times.

PHILIP DAVIES: Who at News International agreed to make those payments? Who signed the cheques? Who agreed to make those payments?

JAMES MURDOCH: I do not know who signed off those payments.

PHILIP DAVIES: Who what? You know…

(end of excerpt)

LORD PRESCOTT: Oh they just said they didn't know! I mean it's absolutely amazing. What we're saying here is, "they didn't know".

SARAH FERGUSON: The tactic of avoiding questions, denying knowledge of criminal acts and distancing management from the decisions that led to criminality had worked for a very long time.

For more than four years the Murdochs and their executives claimed that a rogue reporter Clive Goodman and a rogue private detective Glenn Mulcaire were responsible for the entire scandal.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 21 July 2011)

ANDY COULSON, EDITOR NEWS OF THE WORLD 2003-2007: But if a rogue reporter decides to behave in that fashion I am not sure that there is an awful lot more I could have done.

(end of excerpt)

TOM WATSON: The single rogue reporter defence was one bit fat corporate lie and we need to find the executives who prosecuted that argument.

SARAH FERGUSON: They may well have continued to get away with it were it not for this man, Guardian journalist Nick Davies.

Davies revealed in July this year that as well as celebrities and politicians, the News of the World had also hacked into the phone of a murdered school girl, Milly Dowler, in the frantic days after the teenager went missing.

SALLY DOWLER, MILLY DOWLER'S MOTHER (March 2002): Milly, darling, if you are watching or listening to this, mum, dad, Gemma, Granny and all the family want you to know that we all love you and we really miss you and we can't wait to have you back home with us.

NICK DAVIES, JOURNALIST FOR THE GUARDIAN: I sent an email to the editor saying I think this is the most powerful hacking story so far. But neither he nor I foresaw the scale of that impact. And it produced this kind of emotional tidal wave in the country that just knocked everybody over. And when they stood up again nobody was willing to be on the News of the World's side, but nobody.

DAVID CAMERON, PRIME MINISTER (6 July 2011): Murder victims, terrorist victims who've had their phones hacked is quite disgraceful...

NICK DAVIES: The big corporations who were advertising in the News of the World started pulling out their advertising. MPs, I mean in flocks, crossed the floor so to speak of the House of Commons, deserting the previous alliance to the Murdoch organisation and standing up and denouncing it.

GORDON BROWN, PRIME MINISTER 2007-2010 (13 July 2011): Many, many wholly innocent men, women and children who at their darkest hour found their private, innermost feelings and their private tears bought and sold by News International for commercial gain.

SARAH FERGUSON: Former News of the World journalist Paul McMullan was one of the few reporters prepared to speak out publicly against the Murdochs and their executives.

PAUL MCMULLAN, FORMER NEWS OF THE WORLD REPORTER: Rebekah Brooks, James Murdoch and Andy Coulson are saying, "I have clean hands. It was the reporters. I didn't know what they were doing. I'm innocent. It was them. Send them to jail not me." Why don't you stand up and tell the truth and say "Sometimes you know if you want to catch a politician with his trousers round his ankles you've got to hack his phone. We did it. It's justified."

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 19 July 2011)

JIM SHERIDAN, MP: Mr Murdoch, do you accept that ultimately you are responsible for this whole fiasco?

RUPERT MURDOCH: No.

JIM SHERIDAN: You are not responsible. Who is responsible?

RUPERT MURDOCH: The people that I trusted to run it, and then maybe the people they trusted.

JIM SHERIDAN: Are you satisfied by the cash payments…

(end of excerpt)

SARAH FERGUSON: But now the question for the Murdochs is how they could have remained so blind for so long to the scale of the criminal enterprise being run on their behalf.

GORDON BROWN (13 July 2011): New crimes with new names. Blagging, hacking, trojans to break into computers and not just phones. Not the misconduct of a few rogues or a few freelancers but, I have to say, lawbreaking often on an industrial scale, at its worst dependent on links with the British criminal underworld.

SARAH FERGUSON: Those links between the Murdoch press and Britain's criminal underworld are now the subject of a widening police investigation.

Here in the seedy streets of South London, police are trying to pin down where it all began. One of their key targets is Southern Investigations, a private detective agency started in the early 1980s by Jonathan Rees.

TOM WATSON: Jonathan Rees is a career criminal. He was a private investigator who went to jail and was hired to work again for News International having served that jail sentence.

GRAEME McCLAGAN, AUTHOR OF 'BENT COPPERS': He mixed with detectives, liked the company of detectives and he also acted as a bailiff. When you're a bailiff you can have access to some records and data that aren't allowed to normal people.

SARAH FERGUSON: Rees started the agency in 1984. Three years later he was the chief suspect in the brutal murder of his business partner, Daniel Morgan.

ALASTAIR MORGAN, BROTHER OF DANIEL MORGAN: He'd been murdered with an axe, five blows to his head, the last of which I think must've been delivered when he was lying on the ground, because the axe was embedded to the hilt in his face.

SARAH FERGUSON: Daniel Morgan's brother Alistair came to the scene of the crime the day after the murder.

ALASTAIR MORGAN: Well it was a, it was a, it was a sort of a picture like this you know, with a, I can tell that the cameraman was low down like that. And they took a picture of him, I couldn't see his face or his head, It's just, it's just a man in a suit lying on the floor with a axe sticking up.

SARAH FERGUSON: Because the murder was committed in the Catford area, one of Jonathan Rees' closest police associates was part of the investigation.

GRAEME McCLAGAN: Rees in particular had ah contacts within Catford police, particularly a sergeant there called Sid Fillery.

REPORTER (November 1998): Fillery was first on the scene at Southern Investigations. He initially failed to declare his relationship with Rees and when he interviewed Alistair Morgan he took no notes. Three weeks later Rees, Fillery and four other police officers were arrested in connection with inquiries into the murder but they were never charged.

SARAH FERGUSON: Detective Sergeant Fillery quit the police force and took the murdered man's position at Southern Investigations as Jonathan Rees's partner. Together they worked on an increasingly lucrative business, selling people's private information to the press.

Author Graeme McClagan has written about corruption in the Metropolitan Police for 20 years.

GRAEME McCLAGAN: This was during the Scotland Yard's anti-corruption campaign, there were police who were suspended, awaiting trial who start, hitched up with Rees.

PAUL CONDON, THEN METROPOLITAN POLICE COMMISSIONER (November 1998): I do have a minority of officers who are corrupt dishonest unethical…

SARAH FERGUSON: Police commissioner Paul Condon reopened the Morgan murder investigation in 1998, targeting Jonathan Rees again.

REPORTER (November 1998): Sir Paul, who has made anti corruption a personal crusade has now singled out the murder for reinvestigation by CIB3 his anti corruption unit.

SARAH FERGUSON: In a police operation called "Nigeria". The offices of Southern Investigations were bugged.

GRAEME MCCLAGAN: First of all it was to get information about the murder. But the second reason was that the agency with its connections with corrupt cops and the fact that there were stories appearing that were embarrassing to the Metropolitan Police.

SARAH FERGUSON: The transcripts of police recordings reveal a foul-mouthed, racist Jonathan Rees selling information and stolen data to the newspapers.

VOICEOVER OF POLICE TRANSCRIPTS: Alex Marunchak says can he have that story about the helmets 'cause it's a fucking brilliant story? It's a good story, fucking niggers stabbing niggers.

SARAH FERGUSON: By now Rees was working with a range of newspapers but Alex Marunchak, the News of the World's senior executive editor, was one of Rees' key contacts and highest payers.

VOICEOVER OF POLICE TRANSCRIPTS: There's no one pays like the News of the World does.

SARAH FERGUSON: Ukrainian born Marunchak has so far been able to distance himself from the scandal; he's one of the few senior editors of the time not on charges.

PAUL MCMULLAN: He was great. He should have been made editor. I don't think we'd be in this mess if he had a been.

SARAH FERGUSON: Why great?

PAUL MCMULLAN: Oh smooth operator, knew the job backwards.

SARAH FERGUSON: Four Corners has uncovered new evidence linking Marunchak more closely to Rees' operation.

Company documents show that Marunchak established an import-export business operating out of Rees' premises in 1996 in partnership with another News of the World reporter, Greg Miskiw. The police surveillance reveals frequent contact between Rees and Marunchak.

GRAEME MCLAGAN: At one stage Rees is telling someone that he's owed 7000 pounds by Marunchak and ah once that's paid it'll be close to the monthly limit. So there was quite a lot of money coming from News of the World.

SARAH FERGUSON: In April 1999 BBC TV presenter Jill Dando was murdered on her doorstep. Rees' invoices show that Marunchak paid him for information on the murdered celebrity. A series of exclusive articles soon appeared with Marunchak's by-line. Rees is usually careful about what he puts into the invoices.

VOICEOVER OF POLICE TRANSCRIPTS: This is tiresome, fucking tiresome. We are not going to put the number in there because what we are doing is illegal.

SARAH FERGUSON: Illegal and profitable. Rees was earning up to 150,000 pounds a year from the News of the World. His targets were varied: celebrities, footballers, politicians. Tony Blair's press secretary Alastair Campbell was one of them.

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL: Insofar as it related to me, it wasn't the News of the World, it wasn't even the Daily Mail it was the Mirror, which is my old paper.

SARAH FERGUSON: Ex -News of the World Reporter Gary Jones, who'd moved to the Mirror, paid Rees for information on Campbell.

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL: It seems to be that they were in a sense replacing journalists. Now presumably that would be for two reasons: possibly to cut costs, but the other reason you assume is because it meant the private detectives could do things that journalists can't.

GRAEME MCCLAGAN: Rees had been dealing with at least three different newspapers, the News of the World foremost probably, the Sunday Mirror a close second and the Daily Mirror.

PAUL MCMULLAN: It was exceptionally competitive becaus you know we were the biggest selling paper in the world apart from the Chinese Times and we wanted to define the week's news and it was a Sunday paper so you had to get exclusives that would hold until Sunday and that's difficult.

SARAH FERGUSON: Paul McMullan worked on the features desk during this period in competition also with his own news desk. They didn't use Rees; they had their own private investigators.

PAUL MCMULLAN: The paper was set up in two competing departments, features and news. There was no crossover between PI's, between the two departments because they wouldn't have wanted us to know what they were doing. That was the whole problem. It was just running out of control.

SARAH FERGUSON: Just how widespread those practices were across a range of newspapers was revealed in a 2003 investigation into another private detective.

Operation Motorman was carried out by the British Information Commissioner into a man called Steve Whittamore.

DAVID SMITH, DEPUTY INFORMATION COMMISSIONER: We knew the media were involved. It was the extent of the trade and the way in which Whittamore ran a full time business on this. It was round about 30 publications, round about 300 journalists.

SARAH FERGUSON: Former policeman Dave Clancy is the Information Commissioner's chief investigator; his team led the raid on Whittamore's house.

DAVE CLANCY, INFORMATION COMMISSIONER'S CHIEF INVESTIGATOR: They entered the premises, executed the search warrant and found a number of documents which clearly indicated that he was heavily involved in the unlawful trading of personal information.

SARAH FERGUSON: They seized four ledgers. The blue book was for Rupert Murdoch's News International. It contained 922 requests made by 28 journalists from its tabloid papers.

PAUL MCMULLAN: Steve Whittamore was getting two to four grand a week. He was earning more than the reporters.

SARAH FERGUSON: Investigators identified more than 17,000 requests to Steve Whittamore. The Daily Mail was top of the list with

NICK DAVIES: He had people who specialized in blagging into credit card companies. He had a couple of people who specialized into blagging into phone companies. So he could get all- into almost any confidential data base he wanted.

SARAH FERGUSON: Some of the requests to Whittamore were legal; most were not, including 29 examples of accessing the police national computer.

DAVE CLANCY: It's quite clear that from the information we have that lots of journalists were involved in criminal activity.

SARAH FERGUSON: Steve Whittamore and three of his accomplices were convicted of data offences and accessing the national police database. None of the four men went to jail.

The Information Commissioner published the lists of offending newspapers, but no journalists or proprietors were charged with anything.

NICK DAVIES: There would've been a dozen, 15 private investigators working regularly for Fleet Street newspapers and each of those private investigators was routinely breaking the law, that's why they were being hired. They are blagging into confidential databases, they are hacking voicemail. As time goes by they get into hacking emails and occasionally on the fringes they are organising burglaries.

SARAH FERGUSON: The South London private detective Jonathan Rees was possibly the most vicious of a bad bunch.

Weeks into the police covert surveillance of Rees, they heard him planning a hideous crime.

GRAEME MCCLAGAN: The police heard discussion about a conspiracy to plant cocaine on a woman who would, who was involved in a custody battle with her husband.

SARAH FERGUSON: Rees was planning to use his corrupt police contacts to plant a large quantity of cocaine on a young woman, Kim James, and have her arrested.

BRUCE HOULDER QC, PROSECUTOR, JONATHAN REES TRIAL: It was absolutely vile. Not only was it a suggestion seriously made, it was a suggestion carried out. The drugs were planted, the plan was made for her to be shopped to the Social Services as well as shopped to the police. That young woman would've certainly served a number of years in prison and would've lost her child.

SARAH FERGUSON: Instead Rees was caught in a police sting and sentenced to seven years in prison. Astonishingly on his release he would be immediately rehired by the News of the World.

TOM WATSON MP: It's absolutely extraordinary that a company after all, let's say a $50 billion global business, would hire someone who's just served a jail sentence for seven years for planting drugs on a defenceless woman to try and frame her and then they hire him to do investigation work. It's just beggars belief.

SARAH FERGUSON: Questioned in Parliament last month the former CEO of News International Rebekah Brooks claimed to know nothing about Rees.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 19 July 2011)

TOM WATSON: Do you believe that he conducted illegal activities on behalf of News of the World?

REBEKAH BROOKS: I don't know what he did for the News of the World, I'm sorry.

TOM WATSON: Do you not think that people will just find it incredible that, as chief executive of the company, you don't know?

REBEKAH BROOKS: It may be incredible, but again, it is also the truth.

(end of excerot)

SARAH FERGUSON: But even during his time in jail Jonathan Rees's links with News International continued. In 2002 the police reopened the investigation into the murder of Rees's business partner Daniel Morgan.

DAVE COOK, DETECTIVE CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT (BBC Crimewatch June 2002): I'm here tonight to re-investigate it with the advantage of 15 years of knowledge and hopefully through this appeal a nugget of information which will solve this case.

SARAH FERGUSON: Dave Cook isn't not permitted to talk about what happened next but his wife, former Crimewatch host and detective, Jacqui Hames, agreed to talk to us.

JACQUI HAMES, FORMER CRIMEWATCH HOST: He was given information, which he later relayed to me, that as a result of him taking on that case and being the public face of it, that there were certain people who were going to target him, potentially myself and the family, with a view to discrediting us and in fact derailing that investigation.

SARAH FERGUSON: They were targeted with the help of senior News International reporter and associate of Rees, Alex Marunchak.

JACQUI HAMES: I saw a van at the end of my driveway parked up and what was I suspect a camera lens looking back, coming out taking photographs of the front of the house. However hardened you are as a police officer when it be, you become part of the case and your children are involved it's you know, it's hard to actually explain how frightening that is.

SARAH FERGUSON: Her husband Detective Cook also saw the white van.

JACQUI HAMES: David was conscious upon driving the children to school that he was being followed, that there was a van pulling up behind him.

SARAH FERGUSON: Cook was able to give the pursuing van the slip and call up his colleagues on the highway patrol.

JACQUI HAMES: He went on to the motorway and arranged via his phone for the vehicle to be stopped, and it was stopped and the uniformed officers spoke to the occupants and established that they were in fact News of the World reporters, employees, and the van was actually leased to the News of the World.

SARAH FERGUSON: They established that the van was leased to Alex Marunchak.

The editor of the News of the World at that time was Rebekah Brooks. She was called to a meeting at Scotland Yard with Detective Dave Cook and other senior police and confronted with the information.

Cook explained the surveillance in detail, organized by News of the World reporter Alex Marunchak. By all accounts Rebekah Brooks offered no explanation, all she had to say was that Marunchak was a great reporter doing great work for the paper.

MARK LEWIS, LAWYER FOR PHONE HACKING VICTIMS: Nothing happened and Marunchak carried on being employed by News of the World. No steps seem to have been taken.

JACQUI HAMES: My understanding was that it was people involved in Southern Investigations. To hear that somehow News of the World were caught up in this was completely out of the blue for me. I just didn't get it initially.

SARAH FERGUSON: To this day no full explanation has been given by News International about its involvement in the surveillance.

As the couple would later discover the intrusion into their lives went much further. Detective Cook and his wife were also targeted by infamous News of the World phone hacker and private eye Glenn Mulcaire.

JACQUI HAMES: A couple of months ago I was approached by officers from Operation Weeting who said that my mobile phone had been found, phone number had been found in the diaries of Glenn Mulcaire. I went along and was shown two or three pieces of paper, which yes, included my mobile phone number, also included my home address, home telephone number, but it also had a lot of information which could only have come from my personnel file from the Metropolitan Police. Clearly a lot of work had been done on us, as well as the surveillance, which is a huge amount of effort to go to by a national newspaper. For what reason?

SARAH FERGUSON: Dave Cook and Jacqui Hames knew nothing about Mulcaire's involvement until this year because back in 2006 when Glenn Mulcaire was arrested, the police chose not investigate.

MARK LEWIS: You would have thought that whoever was investigating at Scotland Yard would have gone downstairs to David Cook's office and said 'We've just found your name and number in our investigation'. No one told him.

SARAH FERGUSON: It wasn't until Glenn Mulcaire was caught hacking into the phones of the Royal Family for the News of the World Reporter Clive Goodman that phone hacking came to light.

In 2006, 11,000 pages of Mulcaire's notes were seized showing thousands of targets, the police decided to pursue only a handful of cases.

From the moment that scandal broke News International insisted hacking was the work of one rogue reporter beyond the control of even his editor Andy Coulson.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 21 July 2009)

ANDY COULSON: I am absolutely sure that Clive's case was a very unfortunate rogue case. I never condoned the use of phone hacking nor do I have any recollection of incidences where phone hacking took place. My instructions to the staff were clear, we do not use subterfuge of any kind unless there was a clear public interest in doing so.

(end of excerpt)

SARAH FERGUSON: Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes, already the target of another News International paper, was one of the victims of phone hacking in the case against Mulcaire and Goodman.

SIMON HUGHES, MP: They were hacking my phone to try to discover more details of my personal life.

SARAH FERGUSON: Police told Hughes this year it wasn't only Clive Goodman at the News of the World who was responsible.

SIMON HUGHES: On the relevant paperwork that the police now have and that has my phone number, my address, my details, the details of family and friends who they were pursuing, other names appear who were employees of News of the World.

SARAH FERGUSON: But the judge at Mulcaire's trial had already made that clear in 2007, stating that Mulcaire had worked for others at News International.

Goodman was sentenced to four months in prison. On his release he wrote to News International demanding his job back, as promised.

VOICEOVER (Goodman letter 2007): The Editor promised on many occasions that I could come back to a job at the newspaper if I did not implicate the paper or any of its staff.

SARAH FERGUSON: Goodman also claimed that editor Andy Coulson knew all about and condoned phone hacking.

VOICEOVER (Goodman letter 2007): This practice was widely discussed at conference until explicit reference to it was banned by the editor.

SARAH FERGUSON: After Goodman's letter was sent, News International Executive Chairman Les Hinton, Rupert Murdoch's closest ally went to the House of Commons and said the opposite was true.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 11 July 2007)

JOHN WHITTINGDALE MP: You carried out a rigorous internal enquiry and you are absolutely convinced Clive Goodman was the only person who knew what was going on?

LES HINTON, EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN, NEWS INTERNATIONAL: Yes we have and I believe he was the only person but that investigation with the new editor continues.

(end of excerpt)

SARAH FERGUSON: Former News of the World reporter Paul McMullen is adamant that the editors and chief lawyer Tom Crone scrutinized phone hacking material.

When a story was written using phone hacking are you saying Rebekah Brooks, Andy Coulson and Tom Crone always scrutinised the evidence on which your stories were based?

PAUL MCMULLAN: Yeah, Brooks, Coulson and Tom Crone and they wanted to know that they weren't going to get sued.

SARAH FERGUSON: Was it common practice at the News of the World to ask for transcripts of phone hacking?

PAUL MCMULLAN: Yes, it was, yeah. That's why Tom Crone will be a fantastic witness if he wants to speak.

SARAH FERGUSON: Why?

PAUL MCMULLAN: Because he had to sign things off. It was his job, his reputation if he was going to get sued.

SARAH FERGUSON: For five years in public and in Parliament News Group executives stuck to the company line.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 21 July 2009)

PAUL FARRELLY MP: The question: was anyone else involved with Mulcaire? The answer was: no. Nothing else was found? Nothing came of it?

TOM CRONE, CHIEF LAWYER NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS: No evidence was found.

COLIN MYLER - NEWS OF THE WORLD EDITOR: No evidence or information had emerged to suggest to senior executives at News International that others at the News of the World knew of these activities or were complicit in them.

(end of excerpt)

TOM WATSON: You know what they say about lies: if you say it loud enough and often enough people begin to believe it and they nearly got away with it.

SARAH FERGUSON: One of the reasons they were able to get away with it for so long was that the police refused to re-open the case despite revelations in 2009 that there were potentially thousands of victims of Mulcaire.

You're actually having to force this out of the police. They're not volunteering?

LORD PRESCOTT: Oh yes, they were refusing to give it.

SARAH FERGUSON: Then Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott was convinced that he was a victim of phone hacking.

Do they look like the sorts of things you might have said to your chief of staff on the phone?

LORD PRESCOTT: Oh absolutely. I mean we're talking all the time.

Their technique you know is not necessarily to go for you in the tapping, they go for people you're leaving messages for and leaving news. So in my case it was my chief of staff.

SARAH FERGUSON: When The Guardian named Prescott as one of Mulcaire's victims he went to the assistant police commissioner to demand answers.

LORD PRESCOTT: I'm told by the Guardian, I now want you to tell me. And they said, nu-huh, came back a few hours later, we've done the enquiry, he said I'm making a press statement in a few minutes, this was Yates. And I said what, you've done an enquiry that quick? Yes, there is no evidence whatsoever. You better put it in writing to me then, sunshine. So it took a few weeks before I got the letter from him and he'd put it into writing. And then I realized I just didn't believe him.

SARAH FERGUSON: Mark Lewis thinks he knows why the police were reluctant to re-examine the thousands of pages of Mulcaire's files, stored in garbage bags at Scotland Yard and it comes back to corruption.

MARK LEWIS: Effectively tip offs between the police people running out corruption within the police, payment to individual police officers by journalists, not just journalists at the News of the World, for the provision of information.

SARAH FERGUSON: So that was their, one of their principal fears that this would be uncovered, the fact that it was a routine practice to pay police, to bribe police for information?

MARK LEWIS: Yeah I'm absolutely, I'm absolutely sure of that.

SARAH FERGUSON: Former editor and CEO of News International Rebekah Brooks had already admitted in Parliament to paying police.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 11 March 2003)

CHRIS BRYANT MP: And on the element of whether you ever pay the police for information?

REBEKAH BROOKS: We have paid the police in the past.

CHRIS BRYANT: And will you do it in the future?

(end of excerpt)

SARAH FERGUSON: MP Chris Bryant asked the question.

CHRIS BRYANT: She looked as if her I don't know as if she wanted to strangle herself by her own hair. She knew she'd made a mistake.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 11 March 2003)

ANDY COULSON: We operate within the code and within the law and if there is a clear public interest then we will. The same holds for private detectives, subterfuge, whatever you want to talk about.

CHRIS BRYANT: It is illegal for police officers to receive payment.

ANDY COULSON: No I just said within the law.

CHRIS BRYANT: It just can't be within the law.

(end of excerpt)

SARAH FERGUSON: Chris Bryant himself became a target of the News of the World, but again the police covered it up.

CHRIS BRYANT: What happened was that the News of the World or News International more generally managed to get its filthy, slimy tentacles in every nook and cranny of the Metropolitan Police and to all intents and purpose that corrupted it.

SARAH FERGUSON: Forced to re-open the investigation this year the police finally admitted that Bryant and Prescott were targeted by Mulcaire.

(excerpt from the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee 12 July 2011)

CHAIRMAN KEITH VAZ MP: Do you remember what you said? You said he was ranting. You said there is absolutely no evidence from that initial investigation of his phone being hacked. You don't believe a judicial review would reveal anything more. Do you regret saying that ?

ANDY HAYMAN, FORMER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, METROPOLITAN POLICE: Well the terms of it were pretty poor.

KEITH VAZ MP: So you owe Lord Prescott an apology?

ANDY HAYMAN: Yes of course I do.

(end of excerpt)

SARAH FERGUSON: Tom Watson is now one of the best known adversaries of the Murdochs. He was warned years ago of the dangers of going up against them and their lieutenants.

TOM WATSON: I resigned in 2006 ah as a defence minister under Tony Blair and at that point I was told that Rebekah Brooks would pursue me for the rest of my life. Boy, did that come out to be true.

TOM WATSON (9 September 2010): The truth is that, in this House we are all, in our own way, scared of the Rebekah Brookses of this world.

TOM WATSON: I was trying to say there was a collective fear that had gripped parliament and it was so powerful that people were almost not conscious of it.

SARAH FERGUSON: It was the persistence of lawyer Mark Lewis which finally broke the spell. In 2007 he was representing one of the victims, football players' association chief Gordon Taylor in the first civil case against the News of the World.

He forced the police to delve back into the garbage bags containing Mulcaire's evidence.

MARK LEWIS: They sent me a small file of papers which included what is now referred to as the "for Neville" email and also a recording of a journalist being told by Glenn Mulcaire how to hack a phone.

(reconstruction: number being dialled; coughs; phone rings)

RAOUL, JOURNALIST: Hello?

GLENN MULCAIRE: Good afternoon, is that Raoul?

RAOUL: Yeah

GLENN MULCAIRE: Hello, it's Glenn

RAOUL: Glenn, How are ya?

(end of reconstruction)

SARAH FERGUSON: In this recording Glenn Mulcaire instructs a reporter, called Raoul, how to hack Gordon Taylor's voicemail.

(reconstruction)

GLENN MULCAIRE: Hello mate, just a very quick one, ah, voicemail re-set on Gordon Taylor and it's got Tottenham related issues on there.

RAOUL: Great stuff, it's the same number?

GLENN MULCAIRE: Same number, do not delete anything. Correct, you put his number in.

RAOUL: Yeah.

GLENN MULCAIRE: It asks you for the PIN, then put his number back in.

RAOUL: Yeah.

GLENN MULCAIRE: And there's three messages in there from Tottenham alright?

RAOUL: Fantastic, thanks very much for that

GLENN MULCAIRE: Cheers. Give me a text to make sure it works, yeah?

RAOUL: Right, bye.

(end of reconstruction)

SARAH FERGUSON: The infamous "for Neville" email contained transcripts of 32 voicemail messages hacked from Gordon Taylor for the attention of "Neville", senior editor Neville Thurlbeck.

MARK LEWIS: It was a key discovery. It wasn't the only discovery in the case but it was a key discovery because it gave lie to the fact that there was a rogue, one rogue reporter.

SARAH FERGUSON: The critical email so shattered the paper's defence that the senior lawyer Tom Crone rushed to Lewis' office.

MARK LEWIS: I remember him coming to see me and starting the conversation with the words. "We thought this had all gone away."

SARAH FERGUSON: What was their attitude to what you now had, how afraid were they?

MARK LEWIS: Well it changed, it changed completely. Right the um from it was almost at that point that we felt like we'd won the case. And then they wanted to negotiate.

SARAH FERGUSON: Put in charge of handling the crisis, the new CEO James Murdoch signed off on a massive damages payout for Gordon Talyor, more than 700,000 pounds, in a case where no story had ever appeared.

MARK LEWIS: Either he's completely incompetent that someone puts a cheque in front of him and says oh please sign here and he doesn't ask any questions at all. It's more likely I would think that he did know exactly what he was doing, he knew exactly why he was signing and he was signing something to get rid of the potential revelation that this was a much wider, a much wider practice.

SARAH FERGUSON: In the final moments of last month's hearing, Murdoch was put on the spot.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 19 July 2011)

TOM WATSON: When you signed off the Taylor payment, did you see or were you made aware of the full Neville e-mail, the transcript of the hacked voicemail messages?

(end of excerpt)

NICK DAVIES: Watson pitched this to James, who had to make a decision, black or white.

(excerpt from the House of Commons media committee 19 July 2011)

James Murdoch: No I wasn't aware of that at the time.

(end of excerpt)

NICK DAVIES: And leapt in one direction, which was to pretend, I would say pretend, that he never knew of this evidence.

TOM WATSON: That was contradicted 24 hours later by Tom Crone the lawyer and the editor of News of the World himself. We'll find out who was telling the truth in weeks to come.

SARAH FERGUSON: For years Rupert Murdoch has attacked his critics.

RUPERT MURDOCH (4 Corners 1971): I'm not ashamed of any of my newspapers at all and I'm rather sick of snobs who tell us that they're bad papers, snobs who only read papers that no one else wants.

LORD PRESCOTT: It's his business model. He does it everywhere. He's done it in Australia, America. You've only got to have a look at these countries what he's been doing; he uses power, political influence, money.

SARAH FERGUSON: For more than a decade the News of the World brought the corrupt and the criminal into the heart of Murdoch's operation in the UK.

MICHAEL WOOLFF: In 60 years of running newspapers this is the culture that they have, that Rupert Murdoch has fostered. We operate in an incredibly competitive world. If we don't win we lose.

SARAH FERGUSON: Twelve News of the world journalists and editors have been arrested.

Operation Weeting, the police investigation into phone hacking, has widened to include payments to police, computer hacking and now masses of evidence from the files of private detective Jonathan Rees. Passed on to investigators after the collapse in March this year of the last attempt to try Rees for the murder of his partner Daniel Morgan.

TOM WATSON: The Rees files are deep, revealing and extensive. They were used as part of a murder enquiry and are now being assessed by the Metropolitan Police.

SARAH FERGUSON: In a just over week the British parliament will reopen its hearings.

CHRIS BRYANT: I think Murdoch's strategy has been for the Last few months what I call the plimsoll line strategy, which is you draw a line round the edge of the ship and every time the ship starts sinking you chuck somebody else overboard. At first it was some journalists then it was Andy Coulson then it was the newspaper itself the News of the World itself and finally Rebekah Brooks. But to be honest it just means that the water's lapping round the ankles of well, in fact round the midriff probably now, of James Murdoch.

SARAH FERGUSON: The son and heir IS now in danger of slipping under the waves.

And as more evidence emerges of the corrupt internal culture in their British operation, the Murdochs' critics have become emboldened.

TOM WATSON: If we were to apply a fit and proper person test to the ownership of newspapers they would fail it.

SARAH FERGUSON: Unless Rupert Murdoch can insulate himself, that fundamental question will resonate around every corner of his media empire.

Is he a fit and proper person to wield the power he does?

RUPERT MURDOCH: I apologise and I have nothing further to say.

KERRY O'BRIEN: How often have Murdoch newspaper editorials railed against the perceived unethical behaviour of others. A case, it seems, of do as I say, not as I do, in Britain at least.

Next week on Four Corners. As the 10th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, Matthew Carney and Thom Cookes, travel to Afghanistan, where war has been waged ever since, to investigate the role of Australian Special Forces there.

Until then, goodnight.

[END OF TRANSCRIPT]

[Jan Klimkowski]

I wonder who was hiring private eyes to compile what is most likely a blackmail dossier on the lawyers investigating Murdoch Empire crimes? :mexican:

Phone hacking: police given 'dossier' on victims' lawyers

Milly Dowler family solicitor claims private detectives compiled file on lawyers dealing with claims against News of the World

Staff and agencies guardian.co.uk, Saturday 3 September 2011 13.21 BST

A solicitor acting for victims of phone hacking has given police an alleged dossier compiled by private detectives about him and other lawyers dealing with damages claims against the News of the World.

Mark Lewis, who represents the family of the murder victim and phone-hacking target Milly Dowler, said the dossier believed to contain information about the lawyers' lives was aimed at securing an "unfair advantage" in legal cases.

News International would not confirm the accuracy of the alleged document, but said none of its current executives had sanctioned activity of this type.

Lewis, who has acted for phone-hacking victims including the chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association, Gordon Taylor, said: "Someone thought it was a good idea to see if they could get information. It is entirely reprehensible and completely wrong.

"It doesn't scare me, it doesn't bother me, but it is an apparent attempt to try to gain an improper advantage."

He said the file appeared to have been put together between December 2010 and January this year, "long after" he represented Taylor but before he represented the Dowler family.

Lewis said he had passed the dossier, and other claims that his phone might have been hacked, to police: "As soon as I was notified about it, I reported it to the police, who are investigating it," he said.

A News International spokesman said: "Current News International executives did not sanction any activity of this type."

The issue is likely to be raised with the former News of the World legal manager Tom Crone when he gives evidence before the Culture select committee on Tuesday.

[Jan Klimkowski]

Like Andy Coulson and Rebekah Wade/Brooks, James Murdoch is either incompetent or a liar:

James Murdoch 'was told of phone-hacking email'

News of the World's former legal manager, Tom Crone, contradicts News Corp executive's evidence to select committee

Lisa O'Carroll guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 6 September 2011 17.18 BST

James Murdoch knew about an explosive email that would have proved that phone hacking at the News of the World was not confined to "one rogue reporter", MPs have been told.

The former legal manager at the now-defunct tabloid, Tom Crone, openly contradicted evidence given by Murdoch to a parliamentary committee in July by telling the same committee today that he was "certain" he told the News International chief of the existence of this email during a meeting in 2008.

According to Crone, the meeting lasted 15 minutes and was also attended by the then News of the World editor, Colin Myler, who concurred with the former legal affairs manager's versions of events.

Murdoch immediately dismissed Crone's claims in a robust statement.

He said he stood by his original testimony to the select committee and had not been aware that phone hacking extended beyond the former royal editor Clive Goodman and the private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, both of whom had been convicted and jailed in relation to phone-hacking charges more than a year earlier.

"Neither Mr Myler nor Mr Crone told me that wrongdoing extended beyond Mr Goodman or Mr Mulcaire," said Murdoch.

He added: "As I said in my testimony, there was nothing discussed in the meeting that led me to believe that a further investigation was necessary."

The continuing war of words between Murdoch and his two former executives almost certainly means he will be recalled to appear before the committee for a more forensic scrutiny of his original evidence.

The culture, media and sport committee was today taking evidence from Crone and Myler and two other former News International executives as part of its investigation into allegations of "cover-up" of the scale of phone hacking at the Sunday paper.

Crone said it was made clear to Murdoch during the 15-minute meeting what the email "was about" and "what it meant".

He said the email was documentary evidence that at least one other reporter was aware of phone hacking and that this was why they needed to settle out of court with the former Professional Footballers' Association boss Gordon Taylor, who had taken civil action against the publisher in relation to the alleged interception of his voicemails by the paper.

The email only emerged during the process of discovery by Taylor's lawyers. "Up to then there was no evidence that News of the World were implicated. The first I saw of that was that was the 'for Neville' email which reached us in spring 2008. We went to see Mr Murdoch and it was explained to him what this document was and what it meant," said Crone.

It was at that meeting that Murdoch authorised Crone to reach a settlement with Taylor, who was eventually paid £425,000, the committee heard.

Crone also insisted that there was no "cover-up" by the company, as the email had been provided to them by the Metropolitan police after it was seized from private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, who was jailed with Goodman in 2007 for hacking into the phone messages of members of the royal household.

A confidentiality clause included in the settlement was insisted upon by Taylor's lawyers to avoid sensitive information about his personal life becoming public, said Crone.

He said the size of the payout to Taylor was "good legal management" designed to avert further litigation from other public figures who had been named in Glenn Mulcaire's court case and was not about buying his silence.

In a bruising clash with committee member Tom Watson the Labour MP who has led the charge over phone hacking Crone denied that Murdoch demanded a confidentiality clause and authorised the large financial settlement in order to prevent the exposure of "widespread criminality" at the News of the World.

The former legal manager said his priority was to avoid cases being launched by four other individuals whose phones Mulcaire had admitted hacking.

"The imperative or the priority at the time was to settle this case, get rid of it, contain the situation as far as four other litigants were concerned and get on with our business," said Crone.

Crone also said that the former editor of the paper, Andy Coulson, was keen to keep Goodman employed even if he was convicted and jailed for phone-hacking offences.

And MPs were told that Goodman received a payout of about £240,000 despite being found guilty and being jailed for the offences in 2007 because of a "sense of family" towards staffat News International.

The former head of legal affairs at News International, Jon Chapman, said the former chief executive of the company, Les Hinton, had "wanted to do it on compassionate grounds because of the Goodman family".

Chapman separately admitted that Rupert Murdoch had got it wrong when he said legal firm Harbottle & Lewis had made a "major mistake" when it did not report any evidence of illegal activities at the News of the World. However, he defended his former paymaster by saying he had not been properly briefed on Harbottle & Lewis's review of internal emails.

[Magda Hassan]

Exposed after eight years: a private eye's dirty work for Fleet Street

Files seen by The Independent detail 17,000 requests to investigator Steve Whittamore
By Ian Burrell and Mark Olden

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

• • EXTRA LARGE
    

[B]PA[/B]

Sarah Payne: The parents of the murdered girl were targeted by two national newspaper groups, News International and Trinity Mirror, and Best magazine

• 
  

A former police officer has revealed how the authorities have known for more than eight years the vast scale on which media organisations employed private detectives to obtain the personal information of thousands of individuals, including the families and friends of murder victims.
The Independent has conducted a detailed examination of the files seized as part of Operation Motorman in 2003, and has been told by the lead investigator on that inquiry that his team was forbidden from interviewing journalists who were paying for criminal records checks, vehicle registration searches, and other illegal practices.
Among the targets of these searches were the victims of some of the most notorious crimes and tragedies of the past 15 years. Many of the investigations were perfectly legal, but many others, it is clear, were well outside the law.

The Motorman files reveal that the Sunday Express used private investigators to obtain the private telephone number of the parents of Holly Wells, shortly after she was murdered in Soham by Ian Huntley. In a statement last night, Express Newspapers said it "has never instructed private investigators to obtain information illegally. We have always and will continue to uphold the highest level of journalistic standards".
The parents of the murdered schoolgirl Sarah Payne were targeted by the same investigator, who was hired by two national newspaper groups News International and Trinity Mirror and separately by a celebrity magazine, Best, which is owned by the National Magazine Company. The same agency was also used by the News of the World to target the parents of Milly Dowler, and by The People and NOTW to obtain private numbers for the family of Stuart Lubbock, whose body was found in Michael Barrymore's swimming pool. The People used similar tactics to target the families of children who were victims of the Dunblane massacre.
Operation Motorman was set up by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to look into widespread breaches of data protection laws by the media. In a signed witness statement given to The Independent, Motorman's original lead investigator, a retired police inspector with 30 years' experience, accuses the authorities of serious failings, and of being too "frightened" to question journalists.
"I feel the investigation should have been conducted a lot more vigorously, a lot more thoroughly and it may have revealed a lot more information," he said. "I was disappointed and somewhat disillusioned with the senior management because I felt as though they were burying their heads in the sand. It was like being on an ostrich farm."
He claimed that had investigators been allowed to interview journalists at the time, the phone-hacking scandal and other serious breaches of privacy by the media may have been uncovered years earlier. "The biggest question that needed answering was, why did the reporters want all these numbers and what were they doing with them?" His comments reflect badly on the ICO, and the Press Complaints Commission, which was given early notification of the evidence in the Motorman files. "We weren't allowed to talk to journalists," he said. "It was fear they were frightened."
The PCC said last night that it had never been given sight of the Motorman evidence but had strengthened its code and issued industry guidelines which had led to an improvement in standards. All the information has been in the hands of the authorities since 2003, when a team from the ICO seized the material from the home of private detective Stephen Whittamore. Whittamore and three other members of his private investigation network were given conditional discharges when Motorman came to court in 2005. No journalists were charged, although the files contain prima facie evidence of thousands of criminal offences. Thousands of victims disclosed in the paperwork have never even been told they were targeted.
News International spent £193 and then a further £105, hiring Whittamore's company JJ Services to carry out investigations into "Sarah Payne", a few months after her murder in 2000. The People also paid for the ex-directory number of Sarah's family home in Surrey. Whittamore was engaged by Best magazine to obtain the same number. At the same time Best, which is now owned by Hearst Magazines UK, asked for three more ex-directory searches relating to Pam Warren, a survivor of the Paddington rail crash of 1999, who was so disfigured she had to wear a face mask. Hearst declined to comment. The families of Dunblane massacre victims Aimie Adam and Matthew Birnie also appear as subjects in the Motorman files, following requests for ex-directory numbers by The People.
When a major tragedy occurred, Whittamore was often the first person that tabloid newsrooms would call. NOTW spent more than £200 using him to locate the parents and other relatives of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, whose mobile phone was later hacked by Glenn Mulcaire.
John Whittingdale, chairman of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said: "There was an absolute lack of any wish on the part of the police or the ICO or those looking into it to start delving into the prosecution of newspapers and journalists. [The ICO] took a list of hundreds and hundreds of journalists' names. Yes, there's a public interest defence but they didn't even bother to go and ask whether that was what they employed Whittamore for."
The Operation Motorman investigator, who has requested anonymity, has written to Lord Leveson asking to give evidence to his inquiry into media standards. The inquiry has expressed interest in him giving oral evidence or submitting a witness statement. He has also been interviewed by Strathclyde Police, which is investigating criminal activity by journalists in Scotland. The Whittamore files have also recently been requested by the Metropolitan Police's Operation Tuleta team, which is investigating the use of computer hacking by journalists.
Many searches will have been carried out legitimately, but the files show the grand scale on which newspapers were using private detectives to gain access to the police national computer and the records of the DVLA in order to obtain details of criminal records and vehicle registrations. Such offences could carry a jail sentence for encouraging a police officer or DVLA employee to commit misconduct in public office. JJ Services was hired to "blag" personal information (by impersonating individuals or officials) from organisations ranging from hospitals to hotels, gyms and banks. Blags are not always illegal for instance, when information is freely volunteered by an individual without reference to a database.
Newspapers and magazines also used the agency to illicitly obtain thousands of private telephone numbers, often including the details held by telephone companies under the category "Friends and Family".
In total, the Whittamore files reference 17,489 orders from media organisations. Some 1,028 are in the so-called "blue book", which was essentially dedicated to News International. The "red book" contained 6,774 jobs, most on behalf of Trinity Mirror titles. The "green book", which includes work from Associated Newspapers titles, Express Newspapers and some celebrity magazines, has 2,227 references. And the "yellow book", which is miscellaneous, has 7,460 orders.
In 2006, the Information Commissioner's Office published a report What Price Privacy?, giving some details of what it had discovered. The ICO did not identify victims and, in a follow-up report, printed a league table of titles that had used Whittamore's service, showing a total of 3,757 transactions.
The senior investigator described the report as "very inaccurate", citing the apparent under-reporting.
Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner, said the ICO stood by its reports and that the placing of these documents before Parliament "was a far more effective method of raising awareness of the illegal trade in personal information" than attempting to prosecute journalists. "The ICO has always been clear that our decision not to pursue legal action against any of the journalists linked to the Operation Motorman investigation was based on a lack of evidence that the journalists who had received information from Mr Whittamore had directly asked him to obtain the information illegally. Without this evidence the ICO could not justify chasing every possible prosecution as this would have taken a disproportionate amount of time and resource and was unlikely to lead to any meaningful results."
The ICO said the lower figure in its report was a result of grouping multiple requests by a journalist as a single transaction.
The most alarming inquiries in the Motorman files and those which would appear to be among the least justifiable in the public interest are those which involve intrusions into the privacy of victims of serious crime. In 2003, following a drive-by murder in Birmingham, a reporter on The People employed Whittamore to carry out a series of ex-directory checks and other searches on the relatives and associates of the victims, Charlene Ellis and Letisha Shakespeare. He obtained an ex-directory number for the parents of Charlene and sent a total bill to the paper for £355.50.
Other tragedies were subjects of searches. When Stuart Lubbock was found drowned in the swimming pool of Michael Barrymore, NOTW paid Whittamore for the ex-directory number of Claire Wicks, his girlfriend and mother of their daughters. The People made similar inquiries for the private number of the dead man's father, Terry.
Blags were Whittamore's speciality. Charging £100 a time, he repeatedly posed as someone else to obtain information from organisations. Among the targets were the Guide Association, the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, the Bel Air Beverly Hills hotel and the investment bank Goldman Sachs.
Some of the tasks performed by Whittamore for newspapers are entirely legal and a number of others have been carried out to obtain information in the public interest, such as in exposing corruption and other criminal activity. In some cases, editors may not have been aware their reporters were engaging private detectives.
Some subjects were political figures. Anji Hunter, former adviser to Tony Blair, came under close scrutiny following her break-up with the landscape gardener Nick Cornwall. The Daily Mail asked Whittamore to obtain the address of Hunter and Cornwall. It then asked for the "Family and Friends" numbers listed by the couple, through which Whittamore discovered the address of Cornwall's parents. The reporter then requested the "Family and Friends" numbers of the parents 15 numbers, many of them in Liverpool and did a similar exercise on one of those to produce a further 10 numbers. Whittamore and his network of associates typically obtained such numbers by blagging them from staff at BT. There is no evidence that the Daily Mail engaged in phone hacking, and no article actually appeared. Associated Newspapers, which owns the Daily Mail, said last night that it had banned the use of private investigators in 2006.
Much of the work in the files targets celebrities or appears to be salacious gossip that has no clear public interest justification. The files contain scores of invoices paid to JJ Services, and among those paid by News International are jobs which he records in his files under such descriptions as "Love Rat Mum", "Sex in Unusual Places", "Emma's Sexy Secrets" and "Bonking Tory". News International declined to comment.
A spokesman for Trinity Mirror said: "Since the publication of the Information Commissioner's What Price Privacy Now? report it has been widely known that a number of media organisations, including some of our titles, used the services of Steve Whittamore. We have not used Steve Whittamore since that report. We are engaging fully with the Leveson Inquiry as we will with any other inquiries from appropriate regulatory or legal authorities."
Only a tiny proportion of victims have been told they were targeted. The ICO investigator and his senior colleague interviewed a small sample, including Ian Hislop, Lenny Henry, Hugh Grant, Chris Tarrant and Charlotte Church.
There are around 400 named journalists in the files, from investigative reporters and newsdesk executives to showbiz hacks and diary writers. For some, Whittamore's services were not just a useful tool but almost an addiction. One reporter used him 422 times. Another carried out 191 transactions, requesting dozens of vehicle searches, more than a dozen criminal records checks, several blags and numerous Friends and Family inquiries. Yet the Motorman team were told not to speak to any journalist.
The whistleblower's story: They were too afraid of the press to let us interview journalists
It was incredible. Even as we were doing the search I could see how big it was and that night when we retired to the hotel I spent about four hours browsing through it and the more I browsed the more apparent it became how big it was going to be.
We were down there for two or three days. We came back and the first thing I did was arrange an informal meeting.
When we enlightened them with what we'd found I was subsequently told, within a few days, that we [the investigations unit] weren't allowed to talk to journalists and that he [the Information Commissioner] would deal with the press. It was fear, they were frightened.
We told them what our plan of action was. We intended to put together 30 or 40 prosecution packages and then go for conspiracy, which would involve the blaggers, the private detectives, the corrupt sellers of the information, right up to the journalists.
When I mentioned the press, I still remember the words which one of them said: "We can't take them on, they're too big for us."
I remember thinking, "It's our job to take them on and if we can't take them on, who does take them on?" As an ex-police officer for 30 years and a detective, there's nothing worse than having a damned good case and somebody tells you, "You can't go and interview the suspect".
If you don't ask questions you don't get answers. I feel that had we been given the opportunity to interview some of the reporters we might have got a hint about this hacking because it was totally unknown at that time.
The biggest question that needed answering was why did the reporters want all these numbers and what were they doing with them?
I knew about phone-tapping but I knew there were complicated issues involved in phone tapping so we dismissed that. Had we been given the opportunity to investigate more thoroughly and interview journalists it may well have identified that phone-hacking existed instead of waiting for the Mulcaire case to break. If we had identified this in 2003 then perhaps a lot of this would never have happened.
I was not present at the Whittamore court case but I was told that the first thing the judge said was a comment about not seeing any journalists in the dock.
If newspapers and reporters had seen the ICO going into their premises or arranging to interview journalists I think it would have sent a lot stronger message out than publishing a report 13 months later.
I feel the investigation should have been conducted a lot more vigorously, a lot more thoroughly, and it may have revealed a lot more information. I know it's difficult to tell all the victims but isn't that the Information Commissioner's job?
There are thousands of people out there who still don't know they've been victims. When I was in the police I was always taught that your victim is your most important person.
I was disappointed and somewhat disillusioned with the senior management because I felt as though they were burying their heads in the sand. It was like being on an ostrich farm.
The impression being given is that they never prosecuted the press because they were so disappointed with the [Whittamore] result of a conditional discharge.
But by then it was too late and, in any case, we knew virtually from the start of that inquiry that no journalist was ever going to get prosecuted.
To be honest it made a bit of a farce of the investigation.
Were these methods illegal?
The transactions which are contained in Stephen Whittamore's files range from area and occupancy searches to criminal records checks and inquiries into vehicle registrations.
Area and occupancy searches
Area and address occupancy searches may have been procured illicitly but would provide no prospect of a prosecution, even when there was no public interest defence in requesting the information. This is because the requester of the information could claim an expectation that the investigator would acquire the details through legitimate means, such as by consulting an electoral roll in a public library, for instance.
Ex-directory checks, phone 'conversions' and friends and family searches
This would be information obtained from a phone company and might be in breach of Section 55 of the Data Protection Act (which came into effect in March 2000 and carries a maximum fine of £500,000) unless Whittamore had obtained them from a friend or relative. These searches could be legally defended if the inquiry was in the public interest.
Searches of the police national computer or the DVLA database
Serious. Not only would they be a breach of the Data Protection Act but in serious cases, where there was no public interest in the inquiry, the requester of the information might be charged with aiding and abetting misconduct in public office by the person supplying the

[Jan Klimkowski]

I wonder what the rozzers are up to?

Hacking: Met use Official Secrets Act to demand Guardian reveals sources

Unprecedented move sees Scotland Yard use the Official Secrets Act to demand the paper hands over information

David Leigh guardian.co.uk, Friday 16 September 2011 15.40 BST

The Metropolitan police are seeking a court order under the Official Secrets Act to make Guardian reporters disclose their confidential sources about the phone-hacking scandal.

In an unprecedented legal attack on journalists' sources, Scotland Yard officers claim the act, which has special powers usually aimed at espionage, could have been breached in July when reporters Amelia Hill and Nick Davies revealed the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone. They are demanding source information be handed over.

The Guardian's editor, Alan Rusbridger, said on Friday: "We shall resist this extraordinary demand to the utmost".

Tom Watson, the former Labour minister who has been prominent in exposing hacking by the News of the World, said: "It is an outrageous abuse and completely unacceptable that, having failed to investigate serious wrongdoing at the News of the World for more than a decade, the police should now be trying to move against the Guardian. It was the Guardian who first exposed this scandal."

The NUJ general secretary, Michelle Stanistreet, said: "This is a very serious threat to journalists and the NUJ will fight off this vicious attempt to use the Official Secrets Act … Journalists have investigated the hacking story and told the truth to the public. They should be congratulated rather than being hounded and criminalised by the state.

"The protection of sources is an essential principle which has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the European court of human rights as the cornerstone of press freedom. The NUJ shall defend it. In 2007 a judge made it clear that journalists and their sources are protected under article 10 of the Human Rights Act and it applies to leaked material. The use of the Official Secrets Act is a disgraceful attempt to get round this existing judgment."

The paper's revelation in July that police had never properly pursued the News of the World for hacking the phone of the missing murdered girl caused a wave of public revulsion worldwide.

The ensuing uproar over police inadequacy and alleged collusion with the Murdoch media empire swept away the top officers at Scotland Yard. It also brought about the closure of the News of the World itself, the withdrawal of the Murdoch takeover bid for Sky, and the launch of a major judicial inquiry into the entire scandal.

Metropolitan police commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson and assistant commissioner John Yates both resigned. David Cameron's former PR chief Andy Coulson is among those who have subsequently been arrested for questioning, along with former News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks.

Police now intend to go before a judge at the Old Bailey in London on 23 September, in an attempt to force the handover of documents relating to the source of information for a number of articles, including the article published by Hill and Davies on 4 July disclosing "the interception of the telephone of Milly Dowler".

Documents written by both reporters about the Milly Dowler story are covered by the terms of the production order police are now demanding.

The application, authorised by Detective-Superintendent Mark Mitchell of Scotland Yard's professional standards unit, claims that the published article could have disclosed information in breach of the 1989 Official Secrets Act.

It is claimed Hill could have incited police working on the then Operation Weeting hacking inquiry into leaking information, both about Milly Dowler and about the identity of Coulson, Rebekah Brooks and other arrested newspaper executives.

A police officer is also being investigated, Scotland Yard say, for breaching the Official Secrets Act, as well as alleged misconduct in public office, for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment.

An obscure clause section 5 of the 1989 Official Secrets Act, highly controversial at the time of its passing, allows individuals to be prosecuted for passing on "damaging" information leaked to them by government officials in breach of section 4 of the same act. This includes police information "likely to impede … the prosecution of suspected offenders".

The clause is aimed at those who deliberately derail investigations by, for example, tipping off a suspect about an impending police raid. But it is being used in this case in an unprecedented way, against individual journalists for publishing a news article. The Guardian's reporters did not pay any police officers.

Police claim their work might be undermined by the alleged leaks. The head of Operation Weeting, deputy assistant commissioner Sue Akers, is on record deploring that some details of inquiries have apparently leaked to the Guardian. Some of the arrestees are reported to be already claiming that media publicity will prevent them getting a fair trial.

Scotland Yard says it has not officially released any of the arrestees' names, none of whom has as yet been charged with any offence. But they do not assert that anyone was "tipped off" by the arrest disclosures in the Guardian or other papers. Most of those questioned were arrested by appointment.

The only previous attempt to use the 1989 Official Secrets Act against a journalist collapsed 11 years ago after a public outcry. Lieutenant Colonel Wylde, a former military intelligence officer, and author Tony Geraghty were arrested in December 1998 by defence ministry police after early morning raids at their homes. Both had computers and documents seized. This followed the publication of Geraghty's book The Irish War, which describes two British army computer databases in Northern Ireland used to identify vehicles and suspects.

Expert reports were produced by the defence showing the information was not damaging. After consultations with Labour attorney general Lord Williams of Mostyn, both cases were finally dropped in November 2000.

Wylde's lawyer, John Wadham, then of Liberty, said: "This case should never have got off the ground … This case is another nail in the coffin of the Official Secrets Act. The act is fundamentally flawed and needs to be reformed."

In the same year, police failed in a similar attempt to get a production order for journalistic material from the Guardian and the Observer, over correspondence with renegade MI5 officer David Shayler. The appeal court, led by Lord Justice Judge, ruled: "Unless there are compelling reasons of national security, the public is entitled to know the facts, and as the eyes and ears of the public, journalists are entitled to investigate and report the facts … Inconvenient or embarrassing revelations, whether for the security services, or for public authorities, should not be suppressed.

"Legal proceedings directed towards the seizure of the working papers of an individual journalist, or the premises of the newspaper … tend to inhibit discussion … Compelling evidence would normally be needed to demonstrate that the public interest would be served by such proceedings.

"Otherwise, to the public disadvantage, legitimate inquiry and discussion, and 'the safety valve of effective investigative journalism' … would be discouraged, perhaps stifled."

In 2009 the police threatened to prosecute Conservative MP Damian Green for "aiding and abetting, counselling or procuring misconduct in a public office". The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, intervened in that case, saying he did not consider that the damage caused by the leaked information outweighed the importance of the freedom of the press.

Only last week the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, told MPs: "There is an important difference between off-the-record briefing and the payment of money by or to the police in return for information.

"Journalists must operate within the law, but … we must be careful not to overreact in a way that would undermine the foundations of a free society."

At a speech at the Royal Television Society this week, Hunt praised the Guardian's coverage of the hacking scandal, describing it as "investigative journalism of the highest quality".

The former Met commissioner Stephenson admitted to MPs that he had tried to talk the Guardian out of its phone-hacking campaign in December 2009. He added that "we should be grateful" to the Guardian for ignoring his advice and continuing its campaign.

[Carsten Wiethoff]

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/sep...-statement

Metropolitan police service statement:
"The MPS has applied for a production order against the Guardian and one of its reporters in order to seek evidence of offences connected to potential breaches relating to Misconduct in Public Office and the Official Secrets Act.
"The application is about the MPS seeking to identify evidence of potential offences resulting from unauthorised leaking of information.
"Operation Weeting is one of the MPS's most high profile and sensitive investigations so of course we should take concerns of leaks seriously to ensure that public interest is protected by ensuring there is no further potential compromise. The production order is sought in that context.
"The MPS can't respond to the significant public and political concern regarding leaks from the police to any part of the media if we aren't more robust in our investigations and make all attempts to obtain best evidence of the leaks.
"We pay tribute to the Guardian's unwavering determination to expose the hacking scandal and their challenge around the initial police response. We also recognise the important public interest of whistle blowing and investigative reporting, however neither is apparent in this case. This is an investigation into the alleged gratuitous release of information that is not in the public interest.
"The MPS does not seek to use legislation to undermine Article 10 of anyone's human rights and is not seeking to prevent whistle blowing or investigative journalism that is in the public interest, including the Guardian's involvement in the exposure of phone hacking."

In other words: Name these damned traitors, or else...

[Jan Klimkowski]

Scotland Yard will give a private briefing to the self-styled Mother of Parliaments where the Top Brass will blame it all on a "relatively junior officer".....

Met police to explain legal threat against Guardian to MPs in secret

Campaigners condemn private meeting to discuss use of Official Secrets Act against reporter who revealed Milly Dowler phone hacking

Vikram Dodd and Lizzy Davies guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 21 September 2011 19.33 BST

The Metropolitan police is to be allowed explain to MPs in private why it threatened to invoke the Officials Secrets Act in an attempt to force the Guardian to hand over notes and reveal sources behind its phone-hacking coverage.

The hearing on Friday is both official and secret, leading to condemnation by campaigners for media freedom, which threatens to dash the Met's hopes that the furore over their alleged attempt to strike at media freedom will die away.

On Tuesday, the Met announced it would end its attempt to get a court order forcing Guardian reporter Amelia Hill to hand over notes and reveal sources behind the revelation that Milly Dowler's phone had been hacked by the News of the World. It then said MPs had invited them to give a briefing in private. it was not clear who had asked for Friday's session to be held behind closed doors.

John Kampfner, chief executive of Index on Censorship, said: "Holding this hearing behind closed doors would be a damaging move for parliament and the Metropolitan police. It is important that the police explain their actions openly.

"The attempt to use the Official Secrets Act on a journalist was an outrageous attack on free speech and those responsible should explain themselves not just to parliament but to the country."

The powerful home affairs committee has already investigated hacking and lambasted the Met for its failings.

Deputy assistant commissioner Mark Simmons, who leads on professionalism issues for the Met, will appear before the committee on Friday to answer questions.

Keith Vaz, chair of the committee, said: "I have asked the Metropolitan police to give the committee a full explanation of why they took this action and to provide us with a timeline as to exactly who was consulted. It is essential that we get the full facts."

The attempt by Scotland Yard to get a production order, requiring the Guardian to hand over sensitive material, was roundly condemned by other news organisations the first crisis for incoming commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe, who formally takes office next week.

The Met insists the decision was taken by a relatively junior officer in its directorate of professional standards, who was investigating a detective accused of leaking information from the hacking investigation to the media. The Met says Hogan-Howe knew nothing of the original decision, even though he is overseeing the investigation into phone hacking in his role as deputy commissioner.

Simmons used a radio interview to admit that invoking the Official Secrets Act in an attempt to make the Guardian reveal its confidential sources for stories relating to the phone-hacking scandal was "not appropriate".

Simmons told the BBC: "We've acknowledged and I've acknowledged the role the Guardian has played in the history of what brought us to where we are now, both in terms of its focus on phone hacking itself and indeed its focus on the Met's response to that.

"But in all the glare that has been thrown on to our relationships with the media, we have had to ask ourselves the question about how do we do more to ensure that public confidence in our officers treating information given to them in confidence appropriately is maintained. That's why we undertake robust investigation into incidents of leakages.

"I think what's happened is it's thrown into the spotlight the difficulty that we have in getting a new balance in our relationship with the media in the wake of all the issues that have been aired, very publicly, in recent months."

Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of the Guardian, said: "I just hope that, in our effort to clean up some of the worst practices, we don't completely overreact and try to clamp down on perfectly normal and applaudable reporting. This was a regrettable incident, but let's hope it's over."


The police application was formally made under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, but with a claim that Hill had committed an offence under the Official Secrets Act by inciting an officer from Operation Weeting the Met's investigation into phone hacking to reveal information.