Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes
#1
A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

by Anthony Lawson / March 19th, 2010


It is not a theory but a fact — one that is well known within the 9/11 truth movement — that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001.
One does not need to be a Harvard Law School graduate to know that the first and most important requirement in any murder investigation is to determine the cause of death, which often leads to a requirement to identify, and trace to its origins, a murder weapon, or, in the case of 9/11: weapons. And there can be no doubt that each of the four planes which were allegedly hijacked on the morning of 9/11 was posited as being a murder weapon by the U.S. administration and the 9/11 Commission, yet there is absolutely nothing which firmly connects the four allegedly-hijacked planes to any of the 9/11 crash sites.
In fact, it is not fanciful to suggest that if a lawyer, even of a far lower calibre than that of an Alan Dershowitz, were engaged to defend the airport security companies that allegedly allowed 19 box-cutter-carrying Arabs to get on to those planes, he would immediately call for the dismissal of such an action on the grounds that the planes which allegedly hit the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the one which crashed near Shanksville had never been forensically identified as the planes which, allegedly, had been hijacked that morning.
And such a motion could not possibly be denied, as I will explain.
The planes in question were alleged to have been: American Airlines flight 11 (Tail Number: N334AA), North Tower; United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA), South Tower; American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA), the Pentagon, and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA), which supposedly crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. But the truth is that they could well have been different planes that had arrived on the scenes from quite different locations, because the crash debris recovered from those four crash sites has never been forensically linked to the planes that allegedly took off from Logan International, Boston; Dulles International, Washington and Newark International, New Jersey, and which were, allegedly, hijacked shortly thereafter. Therefore, they cannot possibly be linked, without a reasonable doubt, to breaches of security at those airports.
So it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more generalised ‘War on Terror’ would not stand up as evidence in either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.
Air-crash investigations in the United States are normally carried out by the NTSB’s air accident investigation division, and there are several documentary television series featuring this government agency’s painstaking approach when investigating the causes of air crashes. During many such investigations, serial numbers from recovered parts are cross checked with the airline-in-question’s purchase and maintenance records, to try and identify the reason for an accident, when it is suspected that mechanical failure may have been the cause.
However, the NTSB has confirmed that — apparently for the first time from its inception, in 1967, since when it has investigated more than 124,000 other aviation accidents — it took no part in investigating any of the air crashes which occurred on September 11, 2001. So the world has been asked to take it on faith and hearsay that the four planes involved were normal scheduled flights which were hijacked by Arab terrorists, some of whom, are, allegedly, still alive.
Even more disturbing is the fact that documentation exists, and is available on the Internet, which indicates that the FBI, backed up by a separate letter from the Justice Department, has refused to release any information under the Freedom of Information Act about any debris recovered from the crash sites, including the serial number of the “Black Box” Cockpit Flight Data Recorder allegedly found near the alleged crash site of United Airlines Flight 93. It may be recalled that a transcript taken from this recorder formed the basis for several TV dramas and one Academy-Award winning feature film.
By no means finally, but just as disturbing, the core of a jet engine, which can be seen in several 9/11 videos falling out of the northern face of the WTC’s South Tower, and which hit a building on its way down, and was photographed and videoed — in the presence of FBI personnel and at least one FBI vehicle — where it came to rest at the junction of Church and Murray streets, was later photographed, prior to its [alleged] burial in a land fill on Staten Island. So much for what murder investigators are usually so concerned about: The chain of custody and preservation of important evidence, pending its identification.
The events of 9/11 had consequences far beyond the destruction of life and property in the United States; they were the reasons for the launching of three wars. Yet it is obvious that a leader writer of an influential newspaper, the Washington Post, could not spare the time to look into such a serious matter — one that people with far fewer resources than he or she has access to have managed to do — before launching a scathing attack on a member of the Japanese parliament and the world-wide 9/11 truth movement, in general.
Just because the 9/11 Commission did not do its job properly is no excuse for newspaper writers not to do theirs. Unless, of course, newspapers such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times are playing a conscious role in a conspiracy to prevent the truth about these events from surfacing. In which case their editors and owners would almost certainly be guilty of misprision of felony.
I would like to stress that the identity of the planes is not the only reason why the 9/11 Commission’s findings should be regarded as invalid, and its members found guilty, at the very least, of gross oversights in the collection of the evidence which was used in the writing of its Final Report. Even a cursory look at the visual evidence of the collapsing World Trade Center’s Twin Towers and WTC 7 should have instilled grave doubts about the findings of some of the experts from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST.
But, for my money, the real smoking guns were, and still are, the four aircraft that were used as weapons on that terrible day, and for them not to have been identified breaks every rule in any book which seeks to teach the art of solving crimes.



http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/03/a-litt...11-planes/
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply
#2
Yep. Air Crash Investigations wont be making any tv programmes about these plane crashes.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#3
Magda Hassan Wrote:Yep. Air Crash Investigations wont be making any tv programmes about these plane crashes.

Actually, National Geographic's "Seconds from Disaster" series included a documentary about the Pentagon crash. Indeed, the official versions of several incidents in the "War on Terror" have been the subject of supportive National Geographic documentaries.

Nat Geo is now essentially a Murdoch company.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#4
I did not realize that there was no NTSB investigation. Not that I would trust THEM. They did such a fine cover-up on Dorothey Hunt, Paul Wellstone,
JFK Jr. And of course all the press is in on the cover-up, they always assist our government enemies in this manner. By their failure to truly investigate the truth of these matters and their refusal to acknowledge that CT is real. It is not theory.

There was a 9-11 press conference in Austin yesterday, but did the press cover it? I have not seen a thing. Typical.

Dawn
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  More evidence of missiles - not planes - hitting WTC on 911 Peter Lemkin 5 22,437 01-06-2017, 09:59 AM
Last Post: Carsten Wiethoff
  Evidence Mounts - Passenger Planes Couldn't Have Done What Was Done On 9-11 by Planes Peter Lemkin 22 8,341 11-11-2014, 05:18 PM
Last Post: Michael Barwell
  A Simple Little Law and Fact Dismissed by the U.S. Government on 9-11-01 Peter Lemkin 4 3,657 03-09-2014, 07:20 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  CBS Series "The Agency" predicted Bin Laden hijacking planes in the US Carsten Wiethoff 6 6,218 09-07-2013, 04:45 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Pentagon's non-lethal weapon projects leaked - including a laser beam that 'steers enemy planes' Ed Jewett 0 2,062 06-01-2012, 11:54 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  OOOoooops! Planes were sent messages after they 'crashed'...that is another oddity! Peter Lemkin 11 8,644 29-12-2011, 05:58 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Secret Service Simulated Crashing Planes into the White House Before 9/11 Ed Jewett 0 2,615 25-09-2011, 01:33 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Why the Planes Were Not Intercepted on 9/11: The Wall St. Lawyer & the Special Ops Hijack Coordtr Ed Jewett 1 2,927 28-04-2011, 05:44 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  So, it now looks certain the Murray St. Engine was NOT from one of the planes they say hit the WTC! Peter Lemkin 0 3,780 19-10-2010, 06:53 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  planes vs no planes passangers living or dead? Dawn Meredith 10 7,038 01-07-2010, 07:25 PM
Last Post: Jack White

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)