Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
28-04-2010, 03:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2010, 03:47 AM by Bob Ringler.)
The magic bullet theory proves that there were at least two assassins.
We know that Connelly heard a shot and was hit by a shot. This defines two separate and distinct shots. We know this because a bullet travels faster than sound. So the shot that connely heard could not have been the shot that hit him. Therefore, the shot he heard and the shot that hit him define two separate shots.
We also know that the bullet fired from high powered rifle travels at 2000 feet per second. This means that both connelly and kennedy had to react to the bullet in the same zapruder frame. The zapruder camera took 1 picture every 55 milli-seconds. However it only took 1.5 millisecond for the magic bullet to pass from kennedy to connelly. So , from the zapruder film point of view, both kennedy and connelly are hit in the same zapruder frame.
So, we know that connely said he heard a shot , turned to his right and as he was turning back to his left he was hit by a bullet.
If the shot that connely heard and the shot which hit jfk in the throat are within 18 zapruder frames of each other then there were at least two assassins firing from the buildings that day.
Posts: 1,141
Threads: 86
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
The "magic bullet" theory is false, provably false, and not even anatomically possible: See "Reasoning about Assassinations". We also know the Z-film has been refashioned to conceal events that did occur and add others that did not: "Zapruder JFK Film impeached by Moorman JFK Polaroid". We also know that JFK was hit four times (once in the throat from in front, once in the back from behind, and twice in the head, from behind and from in front) and that John Connally was hit one to three times. The most important work on the medical evidence is a chapter by David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., in MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA (2000). For an overview of the case, see "Dealey Plaza Revisited: What Happened to JFK?", downloadable from http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/ You may also like several blogs about JFK at http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com.
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
28-04-2010, 03:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2010, 03:54 PM by Bob Ringler.)
To be honest, I have not put a lot of attention on the magic bullet part of this case. My focus has been on the grassy knoll.
With all due respect , you all have debated this issue long enough(over 40 years). It is time to solve it. We have to solve it with what we have. There is more than enough evidence to solve this case if you all would just look in the right place.
Even if some of the data has been manipulated(which I think it has been, specially some of the film evidence. I am sure that frames are missing from some films)!
I agree with you that there were two head shots. The most important medical evidence for me is this xray of jfk skull. That picture paints a very simple picture. It says there was a shot to his head from behind and there was a final shot to his temple area. That shot to the temple came from the grassy knoll. That round hole is an entry wound and it came after the shot from behind. Its kind of like a punctuation mark! To the assassins it was their insurance card.
![[Image: jfk_skull.png]](http://hogtuner.net/bman/jfk_skull.png)
Posts: 1,141
Threads: 86
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
28-04-2010, 04:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2010, 04:15 PM by James H. Fetzer.)
Bob, I gave you my best recommendations, including an overview of the assassination, which you can even download and study at your leisure. In case you don't know it, David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., is the leading expert on the medical evidence in the world today. He discovered that the X-rays had been altered, (a) by adding a "patch" to the lateral cranial X-ray for the purpose of concealing a massive blow-out to the back of the head, (b) by adding a 6.5mm metallic slice to the anterior-posterior and the lateral cranial X-rays in an obvious effort to implicate an obscure 6.5mm Italian carbine that could not have fired the bullets that killed JFK (where you are mistaken: the Mannlicer-Carcano has a muzzle velocity of 2,000 fps, but is not a high-velocity weapon, as many students of JFK have observed in the past. Since JFK was killed by the impact of high-velocity bullets, he cannot have been killed by the weapon Oswald is alleged to have used; and--as I have asked David to confirm my observation--© by faking missing mass to the right-front of the skull X-rays as part of a medical deception to complement the alteration of the Z-film, a caption for frame 313 in LIFE, and Zapruder's appearance on television that night. If you would read "Zapruder JFK Film impeached by Moorman JFK Polariod", which you can google, then you would see that you are on the right track but have a few of the pieces out of place. I think that you would like the overview that I have provided, which you can download from http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/ if you will take a look at it. Good luck!
BobRingler Wrote:To be honest, I have not put a lot of attention on the magic bullet part of this case. My focus has been on the grassy knoll.
With all due respect , you all have debated this issue long enough(over 40 years). It is time to solve it. We have to solve it with what we have. There is more than enough evidence to solve this case if you all would just look in the right place.
Even if some of the data has been manipulated(which I think it has been, specially some of the film evidence. I am sure that frames are missing from some films)!
I agree with you that there were two head shots. The most important medical evidence for me is this xray of jfk skull. That picture paints a very simple picture. It says there was a shot to his head from behind and there was a final shot to his temple area. That shot to the temple came from the grassy knoll. That round hole is an entry wound and it came after the shot from behind. Its kind of like a punctuation mark! To the assassins it was their insurance card.
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
28-04-2010, 08:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-04-2010, 01:55 AM by Bob Ringler.)
Mr. Fetzer,
Thank you very much for those links. I appreciate your helpful attitude very much. Although my career is not as long as yours I am finding that we find support and we find resistance in our search for the truth. I hope you always remain one of those who provides support!
I read a quote from you that I want to repeat and I like it alot.
Quote:, if friendships takes precedence
over truth, then there is no truth, only friendships.
Bob
Posts: 1,473
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2009
A very useful Quicktime video by Robert Harris on CE 399 the "Magic Bullet":
http://jfkhistory.com/ce399f/ce399f.mov
David Mantik's radiodensitometry exposed the 6.5 mm artifact on the AP skull x-ray (which was not described by the three autopsists tasked with finding bullets, and whose very mention by Mantik caused radiologist Ebersole to terminate the phone interview) as a fraud, a forgery, a darkroom creation.
As I consider it, it may just as well have been a hole-punch used on a pie pan, or a "nibbler" artifact created by the clever machines we used to cut metal building panels for doors and windows.
It did not present as an authentic bullet or fragment.
And for an additional refutation of the Single Bullet or Magic Bullet, see also, http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v3n...chson1.pdf
|
