New COMMANDER W.B.PITZER PAGE WITH FULL FBI FILE

[Jim Hackett II]

I think Ohio would be spared most of this storm except maybe NE Ohio. Pennsylvania I don't know about.
Indiana and the Midwest (Old Northwest Territories) were lucky enough to be on the not blizzard side of the front, mostly.

Conditions are here calm overcast and no precipitation. Temp 28 F, just right for heavy snow. But no precipitation.

I didn't get an answer this afternoon when I called extreme W. Pennsylvania, but it was Friday afternoon.

The storm seems to have the bulls eye on New England.

In-climate weather is no fun. January Blizzards or May Tornadoes - none of it is fun.

Best to Charles and I am glad to know you are prepared.
FWIW
Jim

[Charles Drago]

Charles:

How bad is that storm?

I read some reports that it was supposed to be a real bad one.

How many inches of snow do you have right now?

And what is the forecast?

I heard it extends from New Jersey to Maine.

I have relatives who live in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Is it expected to move that way?

Jim,

At 9:45 AM, the storm is over in southern New England but for a few flurries and a light but steady snow over the outermost Cape.

Sorry, but I'm not sure about Pennsylvania and Ohio.

We're looking at 28" to 30" in Rhode Island. Preparedness seems to have been first-rate; unlike the situation post-Blizzard of '78 (which I survived, although it was touch and go for my liver), highways are open and city streets are becoming passable.

No loss of electricity for me, but thousands are without power.

It was a great night to read Destiny Betrayed, enjoy a lovely but not overly ostentatious bottle of claret, and enjoy the enveloping silence that only a serious snowfall can provide.

Be well.

[Jan Klimkowski]

My friend in Connecticut, not given to hyperbole, says he's shovelling three feet of snow to let his twins out to play and his dogs take a slash.

[Charles Drago]

My friend in Connecticut, not given to hyperbole, says he's shovelling three feet of snow to let his twins out to play and his dogs take a slash.

Just got off the phone with my friend in Warwick, RI -- about 15 miles south of Providence.

Her 13-year old bearded collie -- think English sheep dog, only sleeker -- is having a hard time, but her 4-year old beagle/black Labrador mix is digging it. So to speak.

So before she tries to find her car in the snow drift that used to be a driveway, she will clear a spot for ... slashing.

God, the Ripper has had a lasting impact on English slang ...

[Jan Klimkowski]

God, the Ripper has had a lasting impact on English slang ...

The OED says the etymology is obscure.

About as obscure as royal serial killers....

[Charles Drago]

The "Urban Dictionary" website confirms that " busting for a slash" is British slang for "having the urgent need to urinate."

Of course, this wonderful Internet resource reveals, on the same page, the related meaning of "airing the iguana."

In recognition of the original subject matter of this thread, I offer the hypothesis that such activity as that referenced above may account for the temporary absences of key figures during the autopsy.

[Jim DiEugenio]

Wow, that was a pretty bad one then.

It must have been really coming down hard to dump that much in such a short time.

[Albert Doyle]

With all due respect I don't think Jim's doubt of the Pitzer incident would survive his own methods. Not only would he be calling David a liar but his son and Custer too. I have Mr David's phone number in my possession. I think Jim should follow the advice he gives in his excellent criticisms of Bugliosi and call Mr David. I don't think he's lying. Hand-held or closed circuit really makes no difference according to what we're talking about. Perhaps the plotters knew about Pitzer's films, and the reason they weren't tampered with is because he was the only one to hide his incriminating copies like the hero he was. Maybe in the ceiling above the step-ladder perhaps? You really need to defend these people when they are murdered, not deny them. I feel the same way about Mary Meyer as well.

If the Deep Politics template were applied, the filming of the covert pre-autopsy could have been allowed in order to draw others into the conspiracy with a self-interest in not being exposed as was likely done in Dealey Plaza.

I thank Allan for his excellent research. I learned a lot. However I must note that while criticizing Douglass Allan has then proceeded to enter information that backs what he wrote.


.

[Allan Eaglesham]

With all due respect I don't think Jim's doubt of the Pitzer incident would survive his own methods. Not only would he be calling David a liar but his son and Custer too. I have Mr David's phone number in my possession. I think Jim should follow the advice he gives in his excellent criticisms of Bugliosi and call Mr David. I don't think he's lying. Hand-held or closed circuit really makes no difference according to what we're talking about. Perhaps the plotters knew about Pitzer's films, and the reason they weren't tampered with is because he was the only one to hide his incriminating copies like the hero he was. Maybe in the ceiling above the step-ladder perhaps? You really need to defend these people when they are murdered, not deny them. I feel the same way about Mary Meyer as well.

If the Deep Politics template were applied, the filming of the covert pre-autopsy could have been allowed in order to draw others into the conspiracy with a self-interest in not being exposed as was likely done in Dealey Plaza.

I thank Allan for his excellent research. I learned a lot. However I must note that while criticizing Douglass Allan has then proceeded to enter information that backs what he wrote.


.

>Perhaps the plotters knew about Pitzer's films, and the reason they weren't tampered with is because he was the only one to hide his incriminating copies like the hero he was. Maybe in the ceiling above the step-ladder perhaps?<

Maybe in the ceiling above the step ladder? I wonder where that came from -- perhaps an old man who had long ago lost contact with reality?:

http://www.manuscriptservice.com/Pitzer/Article-8.html

>You really need to defend these people when they are murdered, not deny them.<

Certainly so. Then again, what if they weren't murdered?

http://www.manuscriptservice.com/Pitzer/opinion.html

http://www.manuscriptservice.com/WBP-Resolution/

[Charles Drago]

Allan, et al,

Herein lies the conundrum presented knowingly and with relish by "Albert Doyle"-like entities.

To ignore their coordinated efforts to disinform is to provide safe havens for their lies and sophistries and other provocations.

To respond without acknowledging their true agendas is to support their efforts by supporting the illusion that their points are, if not sound, then at least honorably offered.

To expose and excoriate them, as I and a handful of others continue to do, is to risk estrangement from true allies and friends who cannot or will not acknowledge the ongoing hostile operations.

The only effective courses of action available to us are to expose the "Doyles" wherever and whenever they appear and then ban those identities from forum access.

I understand that they will keep coming.

They should understand that we'll be waiting for them.

"Albert Doyle" is not the first agent provocateur to penetrate DPF. "He" will not be the last.

So be it.

In closing, a simple question:

Are there any DPF members willing to come forward to argue for the legitimacy of "Albert Doyle"?