John Hankey Marches Onward and Downward

[Jim DiEugenio]

Seamus Coogan and Frank Cassano have teamed to write another article about this guy's appearance on a radio show where he actually tried to minimize the number of errors in his film, and he then called me--get this--a CIA operative! Whew.

This is the problem this community has. So much great material out there now, by way of the ARRB. But too many below the line writers, researchers, film-makers.

ANyway, read it and all the links, especially too the Cassano letter, and the two radio appearances by Hankey and then me.

http://www.ctka.net/2011/Coogan_Cassano_Hankey3.html

[Seamus Coogan]

Seamus Coogan and Frank Cassano have teamed to write another article about this guy's appearance on a radio show where he actually tried to minimize the number of errors in his film, and he then called me--get this--a CIA operative! Whew.

This is the problem this community has. So much great material out there now, by way of the ARRB. But too many below the line writers, researchers, film-makers.

ANyway, read it and all the links, especially too the Cassano letter, and the two radio appearances by Hankey and then me.

http://www.ctka.net/2011/Coogan_Cassano_Hankey3.html

Yeah he's appalling alright. What didn't make it into the final edit of our latest (and hopefully final Hankey take down) was how Hankey had also accused me of being an FBI informant procuring illcit copies of his original work on JFK II. The big problem for Hankey and his laughably paranoid and deluded claim is that he never ever retired any of his versions he put out there. Instead he left them all out their with errors and confusion abound. Everything of Hankey's CTKA has examined has been a matter of public record. Indeed take a look here. Hankey has posted two different versions of JFK II on two different dates roughly a year apart on Google.

[URL="http://www.google.co.nz/searchhl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4RNWN_enNZ252NZ252&q=John+Hankey+JFK+II&aq=f&aqi=g5g-v5&aql=&oq"]http://www.google.co.nz/searchhl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4RNWN_enNZ252NZ252&q=John+Hankey+JFK+II&aq=f&aqi=g5g-v5&aql=&oq[/URL]

There's roughly about four or five other postings for JFK II by other authors on Google Video's alone. Hankey also has numerous versions on You Tube posted independantly of him. I also think it's important that anyone have a read of the original argument between Hankey and Jim DiEugenio.

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/forum/ :pinkelephant:

But there is more............here's the link to Hankeys web site. What we have here are his secret arguments used against CTKA http://www.thedarklegacy.com/invisible.html it all sounds pretty cool doesnt it (hidden stuff that only certain friends or fans can see). But a question that fans of Hankeys (those poor deluded souls) should ask is why does someone so visibly opposed to CTKA, need to have an invisible webpage to oppose us? Well the reason is that Hankey is not only deluded but an out right liar. There can be no other term to describe him. This is not just vindictiveness on our part this is out and out fact.

You see what Hankey has also done was to try and minimise the damage done too him by Jim DiEugenio's assault on Murder Solved in early 2010. In Hankeys warped version of history he writes on his webpage.

The links are to 1) the original 22,000-word attack upon me by Seamus Coogan; 2) my 8,600-word rebuttal; 3) a 2,000-word follow-up attack by James DiEugenio; and 4) my 5000-word final rebuttal. That's a lot of words, 37,800 to be exact. 100% of the points made against me are simply wrong, irrelevant, or worse.

In fact John it's actually a grand total of 39,575 words. You conveniently left out Jim DiEugenio's 1,1775 word reply to your crony Mike Dell, on the 24th March 2010 in which DiEugenio listed at least twenty major errors I bought up in my thesis on JFK II.

Furthermore Hankey fails to notice that I actually challenged him in the Murder Solved thread to refute every single point and mistake I pointed out in his work. He is lucky the MS forum no longer exists because people would see he could not do so. Oh and here's another thing John don't go running around claiming that our CIA mates cracked the code of your site for us next time you go and create a hidden web-page you might want to think up something more original than invisible' in the http address bar. It took a few guesses over a couple of days and we got there. :loco: :loo::panic:

[Albert Doyle]

As to the present infamous e-mail chain-letter about Hankey's theory I'd like to put in my 2 cents:



1) It isn't certain Hunt was identified on the Knoll as Hankey suggests.


2) If Bush senior was escorted out of the Dallas Police station in front of a crowd, as Hankey submits, then it seems impossible no one would have remembered it and spoken about it.