Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How DARE YOU and your lawyer bring a case in my Court that may expose the TRUTH!!!
#1
Fantastical' 9/11 Lawsuit Could Lead to Sanctions for Lawyer, 2nd Circuit Says
28th April 2011

By Debra Cassens Weiss
ABA Journal | April 28, 2011

A onetime Pentagon worker and her lawyer who alleged in a suit that the Sept. 11 attacks were arranged or allowed by U.S. leaders could face sanctions as a result of their appeal.

In an opinion (PDF) issued on Wednesday, the New York City-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. The case had been argued only three weeks before. The court said the complaint was frivolous and affirmed dismissal, calling the suit a "fantastical alternative history."

The plaintiff, April Gallop, said she was working at the Pentagon with her infant son on the day of the attacks, and both sustained head and brain injuries from the collapse of the building's ceiling and walls. She alleges the Pentagon was destroyed, not by a plane crash, but possibly by a missile or explosives on the orders of U.S. leaders. She claimed the conspiracy was motivated by a desire to create a political atmosphere where officials could pursue their policy objectives and to conceal trillions of dollars in defense misappropriations.

The suit named as defendants former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other U.S. officials.

"The courts have no obligation to entertain pure speculation and conjecture," the 2nd Circuit said. In this case, the appeals court said, the plaintiff advanced inconsistent theories, including that the defendants may have ordered explosives to be planted in the Pentagon, may have hired Muslims extremists to carry out the attacks, may have used Muslims as dupes or patsies, or may have fired a missile into the Pentagon. Nor did the plaintiff cite any facts to support a conspiracy among the defendants, according to the opinion.

Gallop's lawyer is identified as William Veale of Walnut Creek, Calif. A website called Lawyers for 9/11 Truth identified Veale as a former instructor of criminal trial practice at the University of California at Berkeley's Boalt Hall law school, and a former assistant public defender for Contra Costa County.

In an interview with the ABA Journal, Veale said opinions by the appeals panel and then-U.S. District Judge Denny Chin were "both entirely, in all due respect, dishonest. They didn't mention half of what we presented to them in the complaint. They simply disregarded mountains of evidence."

In a prior affidavit (PDF), Veale cited "considered support" in the scientific and scholarly communities for the theory that the Sept. 11 attacks were at least partly an inside job.

He elaborated in an interview, urging us to mention what he sees as two pieces of key evidence. The first: One of the substances found at Ground Zero has been used in controlled demolitions, he said. The second: Cheney told a subordinate before the attack on the Pentagon that the "orders still stand." That direction, according to Veale, was not an order to shoot down the plane. Instead, he claims, it was an order allowing the Pentagon to be attacked.

"You have a job here," Veale told the ABA Journal, "and I hate to lecture you on your job. … But you've got to get up to speed where you at least mention the important things."

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/f...ircuit_say
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#2
Soon after the September 11th attacks, the US government actively tried to minimize and oppress information relating to a possible role in the attacks by Saudi Arabia. Ultimately, the 9-11 Commission cleared Saudi Arabia of any role in the terrorist attacks despite many anomalies including the fact that 15 of the 19 high jackers were actually from Saudi Arabia.


In December 2002 Congress released its' Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry into the 9-11 terrorist attacks. When released, this document contained 28 pages of redacted information that allegedly pointed to foreign state-sponsorship of the attacks, specifically Saudi Arabia. The 9/11 Commission Report failed to ascertain the contents of the censored 28-pages of the report.

Victims family members asked President Bush why he refused to release this information and got no answer.

Years earlier, in August 2002, victim family members publically announced a $1 trillion lawsuit against alleged Saudi bank rollers of Osama Bin Laden. This lawsuit has been stalled and defeated at every turn. In November 2002, the lawsuit became even bigger and costlier at $15 trillion dollars as more than three-dozen new defendants were added, including members of the Saudi Royal Family. Interestingly, three members of the Saudi royal family have since been given legal immunity from prosecution. Attorneys for the victims' families told the Staten Island Advance in 2006, that it could be "another several years before the lawsuit goes to trial. "

In July of 2003 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland was interviewed by Frank Sesno of PBS. In that interview, he stated: "You can read between the lines and see that there were foreign governments that were much more involved in the 9/11 attack than just supporting Islamic fundamentalist teachings and schools. Now, that has been redacted. A whole 28 page section."

The 2008 book "The Commission", by New York Times reporter Philip Shennon revealed that 9/11 Commission Executive Director, Phillip Zelikow blocked other 9/11 commissioners who were working on the Saudi connections from accessing the 28-page redacted section.

In August 2003, an anonymous official told New Republic magazine that the 28-page redacted section outlines "connections between the hijacking plot and the very top levels of the Saudi royal family."

In September of 2004, a month after the official close of the 9/11 Commission, Senator Bob Graham accused the White House of covering-up the involvement of Saudi government officials in the 9/11 plot.

Despite attempts by family members to get this information made public and promises from the Obama administration to do so, the redacted 28 pages of the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry into 9-11 remain secret and are likely to remain so. In May of 2010, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan refused to give the victims' families' lawsuit a hearing. Her argument was that US foreign policy would be interfered with if the lawsuit was allowed to go ahead.

Secrecy continues to cloud the possible role of Saudi Arabia in the events of September 11th. Despite calls from members of Congress, victims family members, and even one of the 9-11 Commissioners to dig deeper into the role of Saudi Arabia, no such inquiry has yet to take place. Why would the US government and the 9-11 Commission protect Saudi Arabia?
Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Visibilit...every-turn
Download:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Visibilit...Arabia.mp3
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Lawyer's Committee for 9/11 Inquiry file petition for Grand Jury on 9-11 Peter Lemkin 8 8,535 10-12-2018, 05:09 AM
Last Post: Anthony Thorne
  Building a Case Against Controlled Demolition, Inc. Bruce Clemens 13 27,089 22-04-2012, 02:55 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  NPR censors 9/11 truth (hangs up on caller) Ed Jewett 1 2,091 19-10-2011, 06:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The 10th Anniversary of 9/11 and the search for Truth Henry Platsky 0 1,570 18-09-2011, 04:25 PM
Last Post: Henry Platsky
  Is "9/11 Truth" based upon a false theory? James H. Fetzer 12 4,707 09-08-2011, 09:44 PM
Last Post: Kyle Burnett
  The Debate over 9/11 Truth: Kevin Ryan vs. Jim Fetzer James H. Fetzer 1 2,512 08-08-2011, 03:42 PM
Last Post: James H. Fetzer
  The Case for 9/11 Truth Urgency Ed Jewett 0 1,963 30-05-2010, 04:11 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  9/11 Truth Red Herring (by Scott Creighton) Ed Jewett 0 2,541 27-05-2010, 07:21 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Norwegian State Radio initiates public debate on 9/11 Truth Paul Rigby 1 2,465 21-06-2009, 06:12 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Wikipedia Editors Attempt Controlled Demo On 911-Truth Peter Lemkin 0 1,918 01-05-2009, 06:13 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)