Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Charlotte Iserbyt: Societies Secrets
#41
I think that it was Anthony Sutton and not Ed quoting about the state. Poor Ed is getting all the questions :poke: after serving this smorgasbord of ideas. The withering of the state occcurs as a natual process of the transistion from a socialist state to a communist one. When the proletariat obtain control of the state apparatus and implement a socialist society and as that society matures and develops (with out interference from reactionary forces, by the way) into a communist society the state itself will wither and eventually disappear as it,as a weapon of power, will no longer be needed. The property will all be communally owned and distributed and in fact the concept of property itself will also disappear.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#42
Magda, I wasn't asking for a definition of Marxian state theory since I know what Marxism says about "the state" which is why I asked the question of Ed. If you read my post closer you will see I didn't suggest Ed made the comment about "the state" but that it was incld. in his post implying it was said in Sutton's material that Ed posted. I was asking Ed what he thought about Sutton's understanding of the significance of "the state".
Reply
#43
From the introduction to the 2002 edition (re-published by TrineDay) of America's Secret Establishment: an introduction to the order of Skull and Bones by Antony C Sutton.

"Wonder why we haven't a "dumbed-down" society? Look no further than the Bonesmen troika who imported the Prussian education system into the US in the 19th century. A political philosophy in direct opposition to the classical liberalism nurtured in 19th century British and American history. In classic liberalism, the State is always subordinate to the individual. In Hegelian Statism, as we have seen in Nazi-ism and MARXISM, the State is supreme, and the individual exists only to serve the State. ... In education, the Dewey system was initiated and promoted by Skull and Bones members. Dewey was an ardent Statist, and a believer in the Hegelian idea that the child exists to be trained to serve the state. This requires suppression of individualist tendencies and a careful spoon-feeding of of approved knowledge. This "dumbing down" of American education is not easily apparent unless you've studied in both foreign and domestic US universitiesthen the contrast becomes crystal clear."
Reply
#44
BTW, getting back to the Charlotte Iserbyt video at the start of this thread, is the assumption here that the JFK secret "society" speech was referring to the secret societies discussed here or was he talking about secrecy by US intell. agencies?
Reply
#45
Gary Severson Wrote:BTW, getting back to the Charlotte Iserbyt video at the start of this thread, is the assumption here that the JFK secret "society" speech was referring to the secret societies discussed here or was he talking about secrecy by US intell. agencies?

Gary - if you're referring to the speech I think you are, there's a DPF thread here discussing it.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#46
[Image: icon1.png]
After reading through this whole thread I notice there was no discussion of the fact that a Unitarian concientious objector, Ted Sorensen, wrote JFK's April 27,61 speech. Sorensen was haunted until his recent death that the internet "secret society" crowd was going to result in his being remembered for JFK getting assassinated by a "secret society". Even if that is the case, i.e. that the Birchers or Illuminati believed the speech was a threat to them, Sorensen knew that what he wrote had nothing to do them. He was desperate to stop the BS that was proliferating about his complicity in the assassination. I know this because I had a conversation with him on Sept. 25th, 09 where he made this clear to me. He said as we stood toe to toe, "I am not going to take the blame for JFK's death to the grave with me".
Reply
#47
Gary asks -- in post #42, after clarification in earlier posts -- what I thought about Sutton's understanding of the significance of "the state" as further clarified in post #43.

I am not sure if his inquiry is intended to be a discussion about the philosophies of governance, my perspective on their erudition, or my personal philosophy. Could the question be paraphrased this way?: Where are you coming from, Ed?'

Sutton's understanding of the state is contained in his bibliography, not just a quoted paragraph from one of them. It and more are available in his Wikipedia entry here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton See also http://www.antonysutton.com/ I have not read those books -- other than the one cited -- but we could ask http://www.antonysutton.com/sutton-memorial/index.html Kris Millegan what he thinks. It was Kris who suggested my foray into Levenda's Trilogy in a memorable chance conversation I had with him when I ordered a new book. Indeed, much of the Millegan stable exists because of his father's suggestion (former G2/OSS/CIA background) that he look into secret societies as the source for greater understanding.

To be perfectly honest, I know little about Marxist theory. I am an American of near-retirement age, which means I was educated at the elementary level in the decade of Eisenhower, at the secondary level under the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, in both public and private schools. Marxist theory wasn't in the curriculum. And it wasn't there, though I perhaps could have sought it, at "the big State U". I did have a course in Russian history but frankly muddled through it on the way to something totally unrelated.

Perhaps the paragraphs surrounding the one that I quoted will lend further insight.

"Hegelianism glorifies the State, the vehicle for the dissemination of statist and materialist ideas and policies in education, science, politics and economics."

"Our 2-party Republican-Democrat (= one Hegelian party, no one else welcomed or allowed) system is a reflection of this Hegelianism. A small groupa very small groupby using Hegel, can manipulate, and to some extent, control society for its own purposes."

The same introduction goes on to describe interplay of Iserbyt's work on the deliberate dumbing down of America; as I understand it, it was she who provided the membership documentation and history of Skull and Bones to Sutton.

To answer Gary more directly, "Yes", Sutton's expression ("In Hegelian Statism, as we have seen in Nazi-ism and MARXISM, the State is supreme, and the individual exists only to serve the State") certainly seems to resonate within my own experience and within the American political debate today as I see it. I dropped the "left-right paradigm" some time ago. A great deal of effort is undertaken here in the States to undermine or sideline any challenge to it, whether it comes from a populist, "Green", or Libertarian perspective. I here a lot of commentary from the supporters of Obama about collectivism. But I'm a New Englander who has been exposed to Henry David Thoreau, most notably his "Civil Disobedience". Indeed, the laws have been shaped over time to make it exceedingly difficult to run for anything other than dog-catcher with a third party label. But I cannot speak for how Marxist theory works, is understood, or is applied in Europe or other parts of the world. This fact, in itself, may be proof of the dumbing down of American education.

Certainly my personal experience resonates with the ideas that "the child exists to be trained to serve the state"; it shapes much of what passes for "guidance" in American schooling. ["Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."] In 8th grade, it was suggested that I had the linguistic skills to become a translator, and I was taken to the UN for a related field trip. The "suppression of individualist tendencies and a careful spoon-feeding of of approved knowledge" also resonates. A limited sampling: In that same eight grade, I was working on building my skills in baseball but my parents were told I would never be an athlete by my Latin teacher and baseball coach. In 10th grade, the actual assassination of Kennedy was never discussed except in an impassioned outburst by a Czechoslovakian French teacher on the subject of freedom. In college, the film I produced and shot on the pollution of the Chicopee River by Monsanto was relegated to the dustbin with the warning that any future employer TV station would never air anything like that. In college, the Gulf of Tonkin affair was a whispering matter even in a liberal state by liberal professors.

The end of the introduction by Sutton asks "What is To Be Done?":

"If the voting public was even vaguely aware of this rampant and concealed scenario, it could, and possibly would force change. However, this is not a likely possibility. Most people are "go-along" types, with limited personal objectives and a high threshold for official misdeeds.

What is taken over a century to establish cannot be changed in a few years. The initial question is education. To eliminate the leaky alien system that stifles individual initiative and trains children to become mindless zombies, serving the state.

We need a lot less propaganda for "education" and a more individual creative search for learning. Instead of more money for education, we need to allocate a lot less. The existing system of education is little more than a conditioning mechanism. It has little to do with education in the true sense, and a lot to do with control of the individual....."


This is also something I can agree with; the bibliography for my "graduate-level" 1,400-page collection of excerpts on personal performance psychology entitled "Summon The Magic" includes (in addition to multiple references on sports psychology, aikido and coaching) the following:

The Art of Possibility, Rosamund Stone Zander and Benjamin Zander, Harvard Business School Press, 2000. [A delicious little book for leaders that invites you to open the door to the full potential of what's happening around you.]

The Everyday Work of Art: How Artistic Experience Can Transform Your Life, Eric Booth, Sourcebooks, Napierville, Illinois 1997. [At the foundation of Summon The Magic, the concepts in this book should be taught to every high school student; written by an individual who has achieved unparalleled success in the fields of music, the performing arts and business.] [Having been recognized by many educators as an outstanding book, it has been re-published by Authors' Guild Back-in-Print (iUniverse.com) (ISBN 0-595-19380-3) with the new subtitle Awakening the Extraordinary in Your Daily Life.]

Free Play: Improvisation in Life and Art, Stephen Nachmanovitch, Tarcher/Putnam, NY 1990. [This book is so delightful, I ordered extras for my fellow players in the inaugural "Game of Games".]

God and the Evolving Universe: The Next Step in Personal Evolution, by James Redfield, Michael Murphy and Sylvia Timbers, Tarcher/Putnam, New York 2002. [A profound book with a stunning premise, something more than just its thorough yet simple review of the wisdoms of sages, mystics and scientists, it is an exploration of the range of extraordinary capabilities available to the human body/mind/spirit, and it is a call to personal action. Redfield is the author of The Celestine Prophecy, The Tenth Insight and The Celestine Vision. Murphy, the founder of the Esalen Institute, is the author of In the Zone (with Rhea Murphy), The Future of the Body, and The Life We are Given (with George Leonard). Timbers has been involved in consciousness studies and training for 20 years and a multimedia producer of projects focused on psychological and spiritual development. The book also contains a 66-page guide to the literature of transformative practice and a 28-page series of simple suggested practices that will deepen anyone's abilities in personal development of body/mind/spirit unity.]

How To Be, Do, or Have Anything: A Practical Guide to Creative Empowerment, Laurence G. Boldt, Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, CA 2001. [Buy one immediately for all your kids.]

In Pursuit of Excellence: How To Win in Sport and Life Through Mental Training, (book & audio cassettes),Terry Orlick, PhD., Human Kinetics, 1997.

Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century, Howard Gardner, Basic Books, New York, 1999. [A seminal work in educational reform.]

A Mind at a Time: America's Top Expert Shows How Every Child Can Succeed, Mel Levine, M.D., Simon and Schuster, New York 2002. 


Nature and the Human Soul: Cultivating Wholeness and Community in a Fragmented World, Bill Plotkin, New World Library, Novato, CA 2008. {A major work on developmental psychology and ecopsychology.]

One Kid at a Time: Big Lessons from a Small School, Eliot Levine, Teachers College Press, New York, 2002. [About learning through interests, passions, tasks and internships at a unique high school in Providence, RI.]

Reclaiming Our Children: A Healing Plan for a Nation in Crisis, Peter R. Breggin, M.D., Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA 2000.

Seven Times Smarter: 50 Activities, Games and Projects to Develop the Seven
Intelligences of Your Child, Laurel Schmidt, Three Rivers Press, New York 2001. [If you want a pearl, you have to put a grain of sand in the shell. There are many low-cost approaches here to help jump-start kids off the couch, away from the glass box they are staring at, and into a successful and enjoyable learning experience. Also for the kid in you (like Cameron's "Artist's Dates"), and for grandparents too!.]

Schools With Spirit: Nurturing the Inner Lives of Children and Teachers, edited by Linda Lantieri, Beacon Press, 2001. [A fascinating and delightful book about how to bring the arts, spirituality, the environment and other approaches to deep engagement and connectedness into the educational process.]

Smart Moves: Why Learning is Not All In Your Head, Carla Hannaford,
Ph.D., Great Ocean Publishers, Arlington, VA 1995. [The author is a nationally- recognized neuropsychologist and educator. This is a fascinating, very readable and important book on neuroscience, educational kinesiology and the brain/body connection as it affects us in learning, in performance, at work, and in society. It explains several basic BrainGym exercises, very simple techniques anyone can use to enhance their lives in innumerable ways.]



Sparks of Genius: The 13 Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People, Robert and Michele Root-Bernstein, Houghton Mifflin, New York. 1999. [The primary tools are observing, imaging, abstracting, recognizing patterns, forming patterns, analogizing, body thinking, empathizing and dimensional thinking; the integrative tools are modeling, playing, transforming and synthesizing.]

An Unused Intelligence: Physical Thinking for the 21st Century, Andy Brynner and Dawna Markova, Ph.D., Conan Press, Berkeley, CA 1996. [This is a "handbook for implementing the five disciplines of learning organizations", with a flavor that borrows on aikido.]


So, the summary answer from a personal level is this:

I figure the state, or the collective, will be significantly enhanced if we give it citizens who are prepared to pursue their own dreams and visions and goals instead of being limited to someone else's.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply
#48
Gary Severson Wrote:Magda, I wasn't asking for a definition of Marxian state theory since I know what Marxism says about "the state" which is why I asked the question of Ed. If you read my post closer you will see I didn't suggest Ed made the comment about "the state" but that it was incld. in his post implying it was said in Sutton's material that Ed posted. I was asking Ed what he thought about Sutton's understanding of the significance of "the state".


Gary - I'm citing only your quote above, but considering your several posts on Anthony Sutton's comments about the influence of Hegelian Statism.

It's hard to think of a state that has withered away, according to classic Marxist theory as articulated by Magda in her post.

My own take is that Sutton was attemping to draw a direct link between the philosophies that spawned totalitarian states and the Skull & Boners' "suppression of individualist tendencies and a careful spoon-feeding of of approved knowledge" in the US education system. And onwards into the control of adult Americans, through the dumbing down of public discourse in America, and its enclosure within carefully defined borders guarded by Mockingbirds.

I don't think the Boners would be terribly keen on the type of state control of thought that they promote "withering away".... :loco:

Thanks for the information about Ted Sorensen.

What else did he tell you about the speech, and its, ahem, deeper meanings?
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#49
Gary Severson Wrote:After reading through this whole thread I notice there was no discussion of the fact that a Quaker, Ted Sorensen, wrote JFK's April 27,61 speech. Sorensen was haunted until his recent death that the internet "secret society" crowd was going to result in his being remembered for JFK getting assassinated by a "secret society". Even if that is the case, i.e. that the Birchers or Illuminati believed the speech was a threat to them, Sorensen knew that what he wrote had nothing to do them. He was desperate to stop the BS that was proliferating about his complicity in the assassination. I know this because I had a conversation with him on Nov 25th, 09 where he made this clear to me. He said as we stood toe to toe, "I am not going to take the blame for JFK's death to the grave with me".

The real question here is, Which speech do you believe Sorensen was talking about -- if he were talking about a speech at all.

I think it's clear that if, in his conversation with you, Sorensen was referencing a speech that he wrote which, in its transcendent message, sealed JFK's fate, he no doubt was thinking of the June 10, 1963 speech delivered at American University.

It may be argued convincingly that JFK's remarks that day stand as the most enlightened and courageous speech ever delivered by a political leader.

JFK's "secret societies" speech was about communism, pure and simple. To argue that JFK somehow anticipated contemporary conspiracy theory is at best nobly wrong-headed and at worst an attempt to enlist JFK himself in efforts to misdirect our inquiries.
Reply
#50
Thanks for the complete response Ed. I can't type fast so the post amazes me. I'm sure you have a few tricks to accomplish that though. At any rate I am not going to go into an explication of Marxism but will say that its reality caused Marx to see into its inner workings resulting in his class analysis of state capitalism as a system that needed to go away with the help of the proletariat. When classes cease to exist as Magda says we have no further need for the state as we experience it. My point is that big govt. is ultimately a problem the right and left have more agreement about than they think. I agree education, as you describe with your bibliography, will create humans that would make a stateless society possible, i.e. a "socialist man".
I would disagree with you though by saying MORE money does need to be spent on education. Not to pay teachers more necessarily but to hire more of them to cut class sizes drastically. As long as we have a class based state that generates tremendous poverty we can only compensate by having more teachers "hand making" student outcomes instead of "mass producing" them assembly line style.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)