Des Fitzgerlad's letter to McGeorge Bundy

[Vasilios Vazakas]

Wiiliam Kelly has posted an article in his blog titled "Dear Mac from Dez re:Cuban Ops".
In my humble opinion this letter proves that Lamar Waldron's theories are fictitious, and major disinformation. This letter was written on March 6, 1964 long after the Alleged C-Day of December 1, 1963. Please read it and judge for yourselves.
http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/

[Phil Dragoo]

A fascinating eyes-only letter March 6, 1964 from Desmond Fitzgerald head of Cuban ops to McGeorge Bundy National Security Advisor proving the plan for a coup in Cuba December 1, 1963, was so secret these two men at the core of the national security structure had no idea of its existence.

We are deeply in debt to the amazing sleuthing by Lamar Waldron and Thom Hartmann.

And a special recognition for their creation in Ultimate Sacrifice of a dead-bang cure for insomnia.

There should be a whiplash warning on the dustjacket: Caution: Reader may nod off repeatedly, often within individual paragraphs.

Unless of course Bundy and Fitzgerald are engaging in an elaborate ruse, a wink, a nod, a phantom plan of much more reasonable and measured steps.

For if the letter may be taken at its face, we may also shovel off the thesis that Mafia dons ordered the contract on POTUS.

That the only coup which was planned for America was that in November, which involved the Mafia as Mardi Gras costumes, and Waldron-Hartmann as window dressers in drag.

[Vasilios Vazakas]

Researchers like DiEugenio and Kelly have provided strong arguments as to why Ultimate sacrifice and the 1st December coup was absurd, but i'll let them speak for themselves.
They only information that i can buy from that book is that the CIA was planning to kill Castro and blame it to the Soviets per ZRRIFLE guidelines. This by itself-if true-does not prove all the things they claim. I consider their book to be a failure.

[Seamus Coogan]

Researchers like DiEugenio and Kelly have provided strong arguments as to why Ultimate sacrifice and the 1st December coup was absurd, but i'll let them speak for themselves.
They only information that i can buy from that book is that the CIA was planning to kill Castro and blame it to the Soviets per ZRRIFLE guidelines. This by itself-if true-does not prove all the things they claim. I consider their book to be a failure.

It fills my heart with joy to see Waldron getting slammed by two pretty savvy lads posting on forums like yourself and Phil. Power to you both.

[Bill Kelly]

Agreed on all counts, but why even bring up Waldron and those guys if we accept their interpretation of the records is wrong?

I mean, can't we study them and ascertain what they mean without bringing up the false theories previously proposed?

I think this is an important record, not for disproving Waldron's thesis but for what it says on its on, and what became of JMWAVE and those who worked there.

BK
Jfkcoutercoup.blogspot.com

[Vasilios Vazakas]

You maybe right, we don't need to bring Waldron up, but his effort to deceive us was monumental, so to have a go on him becomes irresistable, specially when people have called his book the best ever written on the case. It is also valuable to remind the world about the great disinformation campaigns that threaten our search for truth.

[Phil Dragoo]

Dangerous revisionist disinformation from Lamar Waldron and Vincent Bugliosi is receiving a Hollywood turbocharge from Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks.

Celebrities as assets of the agency most often linked to the assassination(s).

http://www.ctka.net/Dicaprio_Waldron.html

http://www.ctka.net/2008/bugliosi_review.html

The battle for justice, for hearts and minds, has two matinee villains in ludicrous costume.