Posts: 885
Threads: 30
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Its just a shame JF is now here. Note he has not had the testicles to reply after lying and misquoting me about GWB.
He's a one shot pony. Note this is a positively mild comment, JF will run behind someones skirt and complain.:joystick:
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992
Posts: 16,111
Threads: 1,773
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Its just a shame JF is now here. Note he has not had the testicles to reply after lying and misquoting me about GWB.
He's a one shot pony. Note this is a positively mild comment, JF will run behind someones skirt and complain.:joystick:
Sorry, to me that is both gratuitously nasty and off topic, IMHO
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Posts: 885
Threads: 30
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Seamus Coogan Wrote:Its just a shame JF is now here. Note he has not had the testicles to reply after lying and misquoting me about GWB.
He's a one shot pony. Note this is a positively mild comment, JF will run behind someones skirt and complain.:joystick:
Sorry, to me that is both gratuitously nasty and off topic, IMHO
No Peter JF's use of my quotes on GWB were 'gratuitously off topic'. Terribly so. I won't post her again and I await his reply to my comments
on the GWB thread.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992
Posts: 16,111
Threads: 1,773
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:Seamus Coogan Wrote:Its just a shame JF is now here. Note he has not had the testicles to reply after lying and misquoting me about GWB.
He's a one shot pony. Note this is a positively mild comment, JF will run behind someones skirt and complain.:joystick:
Sorry, to me that is both gratuitously nasty and off topic, IMHO
No Peter JF's use of my quotes on GWB were 'gratuitously off topic'. Terribly so. I won't post her again and I await his reply to my comments
on the GWB thread.
The growing bickering and nastiness is reminiscent of the Education Forum and one of the reasons [along with uequal handedness of the two boses, trolls and provocateurs, as well as and immoderators] that many of us left. I'm sad to see it spreading her. A bit more civility, even if people disagree, I think, will keep this Forum out of the mire of the other and others. You not scoring salient points, only attack points IMHO.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
I agree with Peter.
Take on Jim Fetzer in response to his provocations where they occur.
To start a new thread simply to attack Fetzer is pointless, in defiance of this forum's spirit, and wholly counter-productive.
By all means have at Fetzer and anyone else if you stand in opposition to their stated positions. But I'm not even close to declaring that Fetzer is wittingly carrying our common enemy's water, and my arguments with him, no matter how strongly I express them, are focused on his stands on specific issues and are offered when and where he makes those stands.
I reiterate: Said arguments are made directly to him within the frameworks of relevant threads.
Have I violated my own rules of engagement? Probably. If so, I apologize to Fetzer and to the readers of this forum.
And no, it most assuredly is NOT a shame that Fetzer posts here. While some of what he posts is indeed shameful, Fetzer's presence on DPF is welcome for the light he shines -- intentionally or otherwise -- on our common enemy's methods.
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
11-12-2011, 06:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2011, 06:10 PM by Dawn Meredith.)
Charles Drago Wrote:I agree with Peter.
Take on Jim Fetzer in response to his provocations where they occur.
To start a new thread simply to attack Fetzer is pointless, in defiance of this forum's spirit, and wholly counter-productive.
By all means have at Fetzer and anyone else if you stand in opposition to their stated positions. But I'm not even close to declaring that Fetzer is wittingly carrying our common enemy's water, and my arguments with him, no matter how strongly I express them, are focused on his stands on specific issues and are offered when and where he makes those stands.
I reiterate: Said arguments are made directly to him within the frameworks of relevant threads.
Have I violated my own rules of engagement? Probably. If so, I apologize to Fetzer and to the readers of this forum.
And no, it most assuredly is NOT a shame that Fetzer posts here. While some of what he posts is indeed shameful, Fetzer's presence on DPF is welcome for the light he shines -- intentionally or otherwise -- on our common enemy's methods.
CD speaks for all the founders and owners of DPF. I agree with Peter, we don't need this to resemble in any manner the other forum. I don't even know what that post -the first one- is in reference to, what the argument is. It implies something about George W. Bush. What I don't know as I can think of NO good thing to say about this man.
Dawn
Posts: 6,184
Threads: 242
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
This thread is locked.
Somewhat charitably, I will assume Seamus was on the sauce when he started it.
However, starting threads of this nature is not what DPF is about.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
|
