Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Non-Verbal Symbol For Our Cause
Greg Burnham Wrote:Raising four fingers (along with its planned association) only invites the accusation of being labeled a "conspiracy theorist" from
the enemy. It invites irresponsible, out of context, speculation. It will further marginalize and minimize what we do. It is a disaster
of a plan, a train wreck in slow motion, a burning Barbie Doll house of cards and mirrors, a rabbit hole that will be filled in with
concrete as soon as the fluffy cotton tail has scurried into its false sense of security.


So what do you recommend? I think you give too much credibility to the opposition. Why should people worry about what murderers call them? At what point are they unable to ignore the vast majority of "conspiracy theorists"? This isn't doorway alteration, it's the prime evidence of the case.
Reply
Albert, as is most often the case, your thoughts and the manner in which you express them in writing are impenetrable.

What "trust" ever existed between the Sponsors of the JFK assassination and their victims?


Albert Doyle Wrote:I guess what I'm getting at is a show of discontent over a phony 50th Anniversary observance conducted by the murderers themselves doesn't necessarily conflict with the Deep Politics perspective in the JFK Assassination. Of course I defer to the Deep Politics perspective and suggest any such protest be done under the informed guidance and knowledge of that perspective and any public attention such an organized protest might bring should be referred to the Deep Politics viewpoint. Ultimately, if the four finger protest served to weaken or divide the Deep Politics stance then it should yield - however I have yet to see how it would.

"Discontent"??? So sorry to have disturbed you.

Attention, Sponsors of the JFK assassination! You have discontented us! You have filled us with acrimony! We are vexed ... terribly vexed!

I wonder how it is that you can "defer to the Deep Politics process" when, as you clearly indicate by admitting that you cannot see the myriad fatal weaknesses and divisive properties in Prior's process, you haven't the slightest understanding of that process.
Reply
Don Jeffries Wrote:Peter,

Impressive post. For the record, not many are more radical than I am on 9/11. I go pretty far down the rabbit hole on that issue in the book I'm completing. I'm a moderator at the EF, and no one has objected to my extreme views on that, or any other subject.

Well then, good luck with your book.....as I now feel 911 is a better and 'longer' lever for opening up the closed mind of many of the Sheeple than is Dallas, for a few reasons...though Dallas will do just fine...IF!

I always felt Col. Oz and Andy Pandy's main objection to me were my posts on 911 [many in tag team with Jack White]. Even BigMan JS who, by the way, used to email me all kinds of 'goodies' privately [I may put them up on the internet some day....as it was HE that broke the 'confidential' and camaraderie agreement!] liked me on Dallas and most other things...but only tolerated me on 911 due to my stand on the other things, and our backchannel communications...though I was not the only one he had such with...it made what happened even more ugly than most know or can know....and he a worse back-stabber than most could even imagine.

Yes, the rabbit hole on 911 is deep, as it was in Dallas. Same Alice-In-Wonderland rabbit warren...different holes.

Well, I've been working/struggling on a book as well; and I'm at every demonstration and worthwhile movement I can be. Occupy is of great interest to me, along with the other things I post about regularly. Book is about the secret end[ings] to WW2, and how those secret negotiations/deals/thefts/trades/etc. set the stage for the Cold War to the War of Terror of today..........[throw in Dallas, all the other scandals , assassinations, government overthrows, black ops; even 911].....and the coming Police State, National Emergency Declarations, and COG.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
For the sake of Devil's Advocacy I'm trying to understand that you're saying Peter's Occupy public statement is OK but the very same Occupy crowding of the Plaza in protest that raised an arm and held-up four fingers would ruin the Deep Politics perspective?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)