Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CIA Director General Petraeus Resigns
#21
I hate the NY Post, but I must take my hat off to them for this HEADline! :lol:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4126[/ATTACH]


Attached Files
.jpeg   cloak and shag her.jpeg (Size: 99.85 KB / Downloads: 7)
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#22
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4127[/ATTACH]:danceing:

The mightier they are portrayed, the harder they fall......NEXT!

Hey, Keith, need a second bowl of popcorn yet?!....:popcorn:


Attached Files
.jpg   all in CIA.jpg (Size: 134.98 KB / Downloads: 12)
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#23
Why Did CIA Director Petraeus Resign? Why Was the U.S. Ambassador to Libya Murdered?
By Washington's Blog
Global Research, November 10, 2012
Washington's Blog

While the GOP is attacking (and Dems defending) the Obama administration in connection with the murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, there is a deeper story.

Sure, it is stunning that the State Department never requested backup or that people such as Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer allege that President Obama personally watched in real time the attacks as they occurred via video feeds from drones flying over the Benghazi consulate.

But these claims only can be assessed and the whole confusing mess only makes sense if the deeper underlying story is first exposed.
Many Syrian Terrorists Come from Libya

The U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya's Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists.

According to a 2007 report by West Point's Combating Terrorism Center's center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda's main headquarters and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi:
WestPoint 1 LibyaAQvsAS Why Did CIA Director Petraeus Suddenly Resign ... And Why Was the U.S. Ambassador to Libya Murdered?
Al Qaeda is now largely in control of Libya. Indeed, Al Qaeda flags were flown over the Benghazi courthouse once Gaddafi was toppled.

(Incidentally, Gaddafi was on the verge of invading Benghazi in 2011, 4 years after the West Point report cited Benghazi as a hotbed of Al Qaeda terrorists. Gaddafi claimed rightly it turns out that Benghazi was an Al Qaeda stronghold and a main source of the Libyan rebellion. But NATO planes stopped him, and protected Benghazi.)

CNN, the Telegraph, the Washington Times, and many other mainstream sources confirm that Al Qaeda terrorists from Libya have since flooded into Syria to fight the Assad regime.

Mainstream sources also confirm that the Syrian opposition is largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

The U.S. has been arming the Syrian opposition since 2006. The post-Gaddafi Libyan government is also itself a top funder and arms supplier of the Syrian opposition.
The Real Story At Benghazi

This brings us to the murder of ambassador Stevens and the sudden resignation of CIA boss David Petraeus.

The Wall Street Journal, Telegraph and other sources confirm that the US consulate in Benghazi was mainly being used for a secret CIA operation.

They say that the State Department presence in Benghazi "provided diplomatic cover" for the previously hidden CIA mission.

Reuters notes that the CIA mission involved finding and repurchasing heavy weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals.

Business Insider reports that Stevens may have been linked with Syrian terrorists:

There's growing evidence that U.S. agentsparticularly murdered ambassador Chris Stevenswere at least aware of heavy weapons moving from Libya to jihadist Syrian rebels.

In March 2011 Stevens became the official U.S. liaison to the al-Qaeda-linked Libyan opposition, working directly with Abdelhakim Belhadj of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Groupa group that has now disbanded, with some fighters reportedly participating in the attack that took Stevens' life.

In November 2011 The Telegraph reported that Belhadj, acting as head of the Tripoli Military Council, "met with Free Syrian Army [FSA] leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey" in an effort by the new Libyan government to provide money and weapons to the growing insurgency in Syria.

Last month The Times of London reported that a Libyan ship "carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey." The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades.

***

Reuters reports that Syrian rebels have been using those heavy weapons to shoot downSyrian helicopters and fighter jets.

The ship's captain was "a Libyan from Benghazi and the head of an organization called the Libyan National Council for Relief and Support," which was presumably established by the new government.

That means that Ambassador Stevens had only one personBelhadjbetween himself and the Benghazi man who brought heavy weapons to Syria.

Furthermore, we know that jihadists are the best fighters in the Syrian opposition, but where did they come from?

Last week The Telegraph reported that a FSA commander called them "Libyans" when he explained that the FSA doesn't "want these extremist people here."

And if the new Libyan government was sending seasoned Islamic fighters and 400 tons of heavy weapons to Syria through a port in southern Turkeya deal brokered by Stevens' primary Libyan contact during the Libyan revolutionthen the governments of Turkey and the U.S. surely knew about it.

Furthermore there was a CIA post in Benghazi, located 1.2 miles from the U.S. consulate, used as "a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles" … and that its security features "were more advanced than those at rented villa where Stevens died."

And we know that the CIA has been funneling weapons to the rebels in southern Turkey. The question is whether the CIA has been involved in handing out the heavy weapons from Libya.

In other words, ambassador Stevens may have been a key player in deploying Libyan terrorists and arms to fight the Syrian government.

Other sources also claim that the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was mainly being used as a CIA operation to ship fighters and arms to Syria.

Many have speculated that if normal security measures weren't taken to protect the Benghazi consulate or to rescue ambassador Stevens it was because the CIA was trying to keep an extremely low profile to protect its cover of being a normal State Department operation.
Why Did CIA Chief David Petraeus Suddenly Resign?

CIA boss David Petraeus suddenly resigned, admitting to an affair. This could be the real explanation, given that affairs of high-level intelligence chiefs could compromise national security.

But the timing of Petraeus' resignation becomes more interesting once one learns that that he was scheduled to testify under oath next week before power House and Senate committees regarding the Benghazi consulate.

Many speculate that it wasn't an affair but the desire to avoid testifying on Benghazi which was the real reason for Petraeus' sudden resignation.
The Big Picture

Whatever the scope of the CIA's operation in Benghazi and whatever the real reason for the resignation of the CIA chief the key is our historical and ongoing foreign policy.

For decades, the U.S. has backed terrorists for geopolitical ends.

The U.S. government has been consistently planning regime change in Syria and Libya for 20 years, and dreamed of regime change using false flag terror for 50 years.

Obama has simply re-packaged Bush and the Neocons' "war on terror" as a series of humanitarian wars.

And the U.S. and its allies will do anything to topple Iran … and is systematically attempting to pull the legs out from Iran's allies as a way to isolate and weaken that country.

Americans should ask ourselves if that's what we want …
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#24
Paula Dean Broadwell USMA '95, forty this year, removed Director of Central Intelligence by outing his surge.

FBI Director Robert Mueller was reupped by Hussein last year for just such an eventuality.

Of course the Arab Spring is the replacement of secular regimes with Islamist ones using CIA and NATO.

Turkey under Erdogan radicalizes over a decade.

Benghazi was the depot and Stevens was the arms broker; CIA ran the operation, but Petraeus was a hood ornament, unwanted, nonaerodynamic.

Parry damns Gates, but it will be remembered Gates and Brzezinski wrote the 2004 CFR paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach" which was followed by the 2007 NIE saying Iran wasn't working on a nuclear weapon.

The substantive regional change is to remove U.S. allied regimes and replace them with ones inimical to Israel--but not so to Iran.

Saddam Hussein was useful to occupy Iran's military for the eight years of Reagan but that was a long time ago.

He wasn't removed in 1991.

At the USNA commencement in May 1994 Bill Clinton spent 32 minutes defending his decision not to unilaterally arm the Bosnians, not mentioning he was allowing Iran to do so.

Hussein said he would meet with leaders of North Korea and Iran during his 2008 campaign.

He will have flexibility to do so with a new DCI, SecDef, SecState, AG, and so on.

His Harvard sponsor was the Saudi prince, his mother the daughter of an Arabist professor.

He is epochal, a meld of historic forces, in his perception.

How ironic that the U.S. government which claims it was attacked on 911 by Al Qaeda now arms Al Qaeda to advance a covert gambit.

For the end of the rope disappears in the clouds.


Attached Files
.jpg   Peace in our time.JPG (Size: 56.35 KB / Downloads: 9)
Reply
#25
Our poetic Forum Muse gets it on the mark again.....

Phil Dragoo Wrote:Paula Dean Broadwell USMA '95, forty this year, removed Director of Central Intelligence by outing his surge.:finger:
FBI Director Robert Mueller was reupped by Hussein last year for just such an eventuality.

Of course the Arab Spring is the replacement of secular regimes with Islamist ones using CIA and NATO.

Turkey under Erdogan radicalizes over a decade.

Benghazi was the depot and Stevens was the arms broker; CIA ran the operation, but Petraeus was a hood ornament, unwanted, nonaerodynamic.

Parry damns Gates, but it will be remembered Gates and Brzezinski wrote the 2004 CFR paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach" which was followed by the 2007 NIE saying Iran wasn't working on a nuclear weapon.

The substantive regional change is to remove U.S. allied regimes and replace them with ones inimical to Israel--but not so to Iran.

Saddam Hussein was useful to occupy Iran's military for the eight years of Reagan but that was a long time ago.

He wasn't removed in 1991.

At the USNA commencement in May 1994 Bill Clinton spent 32 minutes defending his decision not to unilaterally arm the Bosnians, not mentioning he was allowing Iran to do so.

Hussein said he would meet with leaders of North Korea and Iran during his 2008 campaign.

He will have flexibility to do so with a new DCI, SecDef, SecState, AG, and so on.

His Harvard sponsor was the Saudi prince, his mother the daughter of an Arabist professor.

He is epochal, a meld of historic forces, in his perception.

How ironic that the U.S. government which claims it was attacked on 911 by Al Qaeda now arms Al Qaeda to advance a covert gambit.

For the end of the rope disappears in the clouds.

The lower end of the rope from the clouds looks more and more like a noose for our entire Puppet Polity and Ruling Oligarchy,
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#26
A Covert Affair:
Petraeus Caught in the Honeypot?



by Justin Raimondo, November 12, 2012

The outing of Gen. David Petraeus as an adulterer, and his subsequent resignation as CIA Director, was carried out by an unknown FBI "whistleblower" who leaked the facts of the FBI investigation into the General's private life to Rep. Eric Cantor. The New York Times reports:
"Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, said Saturday an F.B.I. employee whom his staff described as a whistle-blower told him about Mr. Petraeus's affair and a possible security breach in late October, which was after the investigation had begun.

"'I was contacted by an F.B.I. employee concerned that sensitive, classified information may have been compromised and made certain Director Mueller was aware of these serious allegations and the potential risk to our national security,' Mr. Cantor said in a statement.

"Mr. Cantor talked to the person after being told by Representative Dave Reichert, Republican of Washington, that a whistle-blower wanted to speak to someone in the Congressional leadership about a national security concern. On Oct. 31, his chief of staff, Steve Stombres, called the F.B.I. to tell them about the call."

The FBI probe apparently started in late spring, when several people associated with Petraeus not just the one woman, as has been reported elsewhere received harassing emails. The emails were traced to 40-year-old Paula Broadwell, national security analyst, military intelligence veteran, and author of a biography of Petraeus. Authorities believed his email account may have been hacked, and this led to a remarkable irony: the CIA chief's emails were monitored, without his knowledge, whereupon it was discovered Broadwell may have either had access to his account or tried to obtain access. In any case, in the course of their spying, FBI monitors discovered a large volume of emails to and from Broadwell. Looking for evidence of a security breach, all they found was evidence of a "human drama," as one anonymous FBI official put it: an illicit affair between Petraeus and Broadwell.

Petraeus was only informed of the investigation on October 25 or 26. So here we have the astonishing fact of the CIA's head honcho being spied on for a period of months by our own law enforcement officials.

Or maybe it wasn't a simple case of complaints about "harassing" or threatening emails. Fox News avers:
"The FBI had been investigating an unrelated and much broader case before stumbling on the affair. Fox News has learned that during the course of this investigation, the name of biographer Paula Broadwell came up. The FBI followed that lead and in doing so, uncovered his affair with her."

What was this "much broader case"? Almost certainly it was a counterintelligence investigation, i.e. a pushback against efforts by some foreign entity to penetrate or otherwise compromise US secrets. We can only guess at the specifics, however we do know that in the course of that investigation Broadwell's name "came up."

On the surface, at least, Broadwell is not the sort of person whose name would come up in a counterintelligence investigation: a West Point graduate, where she earned degrees in political geography and systems engineering, she seems like the veritable embodiment of All-American
red-white-and-blue super-patriotism. This biographical account on her high school website says

"Paula pursued a military intelligence career abroad, serving in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. During her service, especially after 9-11, Paula's intensity was directed toward the war against terror; her contributions and efforts to thwart terrorism have been commended by the U.S. Army and by Europe's Special Operations Forces Commanding General. In this arena, she has planned counter-terrorism initiatives presented to NATO and worked on transnational counter-terrorism issues with foreign and domestic agencies, U.S. Special Forces, and the FBI."

Graduate studies at the University of Denver in Middle East studies enabled her to travel to "Jordan and Israel," and make a swing through the Persian Gulf and Europe where she spoke at various conferences. This triumphal tour was capped by a Harvard fellowship "for study in Syria and Iran."

While Broadwell's current academic affiliation is with Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, her previous post was deputy director of the Jebsen Center for Counter-Terrorism Studies at Tufts University's Fletcher School. The Center, according to its self-description, "distinguishes itself by a philosophy that maintains counter-terrorism should be predictive, preventive and preemptive, with the latter being a last resort." Founded in 2005, the Jebsen Center was made possible by the generous donation of one Jan Henrik Jebsen, heir to the Norwegian shipping fortune, who gave $1.3 million to set it up. Jebsen, a former investment banker with Lazard Freres, is the principal of Gamma Applied Visions Group, an international octopus with tentacles all over the place: part arms dealer and weapons developer, part "green" energy company. As one might expect from someone who has so much of his multi-billion dollar fortune invested in making and selling armaments, Jebsen is on the board of directors of the distinctly warlike Hudson Institute, where Scooter Libby, Douglas Feith, Michael Ledeen, and practically every neocon you've ever heard of have found refuge.

While, in true neocon fashion, Hudson scholars conjure a wide diversity of imminent "threats" to the US, including China and Russia, their main focus is the threat of Islamist radicalism, especially as it impacts Israel. Indeed, Hudson operates inside Israel, where it pushes the far-rightist views of the most extreme elements in Israeli society: the settler movement, and the faction of Likud angling for war with Iran. It has also focused its attention on purging universities of academics who don't toe the right-wing ultra-nationalist Likudnik line.

More recently, former Hudson president and "trustee emeritus" Max Singer who has since moved to Israel, where, as a "public policy consultant" at Bar Ilan University, he spends his time inciting violence against Palestinians is on a mission to protect Israel from the alleged threat posed by the President of the United States.

The Jebsen Center has been equally useful to the neocons. Richard H. Schultz, head of Tufts' International Studies program (of which the Center is a part) was a signatory to the Project for a New American Century's "open letter" to President Bush urging war with Iraq and a number of other Middle Eastern actors in the wake of 9/11. Here he is recommending the importation of Israeli "anti-terrorist" techniques to pacify the restless natives of Iraq. Here is another Jebsen Center scholar describing alleged terrorist actions engaged in by Iran worldwide. And then there's the testimony of this guy:

"The idea of overthrowing the Iranian government through covert but peaceful means is not original. The project was first brought to my attention in August 2006 when I worked as an intern research assistant at Tufts University's Fletcher School of Diplomacy's Jebsen Center for Counter-terrorism. I worked for the then director of the center Brigadier General Russell Howard (Ret.) on a project titled Bringing Down Iran Without Firing A Shot. I wasn't very experienced in the world of covert operations in the field or in the academic realm but I was very interested in becoming involved in it. General Howard, on the other hand, was not only a counter-terrorism strategist but a veteran Special Forces officer, an academic, and a tutor.

It was General Howard who introduced me to the idea of targeting factors specific to Iran in order to adapt to the country's specific needs. He had six factors which he believed were important: The military use of ongoing insurgencies within Iran, political strife, economic strife, declining oil revenues, demographics, and deteriorating infrastructure."

Interestingly, in November of 2006, during her tenure at the Jebsen Center, Broadwell led a group of Fletcher School students on a trip to New York City to meet with then Iranian UN representative Javad Zarif. Both are alumni of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver.

All this establishes a context that goes far beyond the titillating details of the alleged affair between Petraeus and Broadwell and this is no doubt what set alarm bells ringing in the intelligence community when it was revealed. Is there really any need to point out the uses of the "honeypot" in intelligence-gathering and other covert activities regularly engaged in by spooks of all nations? From Mata Hari to the Mossad agent who lured Israeli nuclear scientist Mordecahi Vanunu, sex is a time-honored weapon in the war of spy-vs-spy. A secret affair with the CIA Director is the equivalent of the Honeypot Olympics, and we have to ask: was the remarkably fit Ms. Broadwell a lure? If so, she's won a Gold Medal.

Broadwell's actions sending emails that were bound to be traced back to her appear to make little sense on the surface. But if the goal of luring a 60-year-old geezer into an affair with a much younger woman was to expose him, and get him fired, then surely her antics succeeded in accomplishing that goal.

So who would have an interest in getting rid of Petraeus? Here's where the Cantor connection comes in. The tip by an anonymous "FBI employee" that wound up in Cantor's office two weeks ago came through Rep. David Reichert, Republican of Washington state, who has a friend who knows the whistleblower. Cantor then spoke to the whistleblower directly, who put him in touch with FBI Director Mueller.

Cantor is a great friend of Israel, and Petraeus not so much. The General was attacked, as you'll recall, by partisans of the Lobby, including Abe Foxman, when he delivered testimony before Congress citing Israel as a strategic liability in the Middle East. As the executor of the new Obamaite policy of sidling up to Islamists, not only in Libya but also in Syria and Egypt, Petraeus was no doubt seen by the Israelis as an enemy to be neutralized.

Broadwell's affiliation with the Jebsen Center, and the Center's connection to the neoconservative network, sets the scene: a young, attractive woman with impeccable national security credentials throws herself at Petraeus, and he takes the bait. Whether she's been recruited by a foreign intelligence agency at this point or not is irrelevant: he's already put himself in a vulnerable position, and there are any number of actors on the international stage more than willing to press their advantage.

Will we ever know the full story? At this point, the story is so hot that it may burn the cover story "it's all about sex" right off the wrapper. Because there's more a lot more here than meets the eye. When Cantor pledged to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he and his fellow Republicans "will serve as a check on the administration" in regard to the President's policy toward Israel, he was clearly aligning himself with a foreign leader against American interests as perceived by the White House. But would he really go this far deliberately taking down a key figure, one beloved by Republicans, in order to keep his promise to Netanyahu?

Stay tuned to this space, because this story is moving fast….

Update
: This morning [11/12/12] the New York Times reports:
"F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Broadwell for the first time the week of Oct. 21, and she acknowledged the affair, a government official briefed on the matter said. She also voluntarily gave the agency her computer. In a search, the agents discovered several classified documents, which raised the additional question of whether Mr. Petraeus had given them to her. She said that he had not. Agents interviewed Mr. Petraeus the following week. He also admitted to the affair but said he had not given any classified documents to her. The agents then interviewed Ms. Broadwell again on Friday, Nov. 2, the official said."

Bingo!

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/...-honeypot/
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Buckminster Fuller
Reply
#27
La Broadwell will probably turn up soon on a huge Faux News contract spouting fair and balanced extreme right wing propaganda, and suffering endless innuendo from the fair and balanced sexist pigs she'll have the pleasure of sharing a studio with....


:unclesam:
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#28
Quote:the CIA chief's emails were monitored, without his knowledge

If true [as apparently it is] THAT alone is rather amazing! Are the Presidents? The Joint Chiefs of Staff's? The NSA director's? Who's really running this 'show' from behind the curtain?!?!:wirlitzer:It seems apparent that everyone at the 'top' is also being spied upon by others at the 'top'.....where does the 'electronic spy buck' stop?! Is anyone in control of all 'that'...or is it an endless vortex spiraling into a black hole of everyone spying on everyone in a daisy chain?!

If Broadwell indeed had some 'interesting' classified documents obtained without permission from Patraeus' orbit THAT too is rather interesting!
If Israel or those in the USA close to Israel were behind this, THAT too would be rather sinister and amazing - if not too surprising.
At this point, it seems Broadwell had more in mind that just a PhD thesis...but unknown if all this and the affair was her idea or that of other hidden forces.....I'll put my money at this point on 'other hidden forces'...to which she might or might not have been witting.

I can't wait for Broadwell's first public interview.....expect it to be like the Olympics, as far as viewership! She'll at least get a TV talk show and a best-seller book out of this...possibly much more!

Quote:A secret affair with the CIA Director is the equivalent of the Honeypot Olympics, and we have to ask: was the remarkably fit Ms. Broadwell a lure? If so, she's won a Gold Medal.
:gossip::gossip:
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#29
In a speech at the University of Denver in October, Mrs Broadwell claimed that the CIA annex where two Americans were killed during the attack "had actually taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoners".
It was, she said, "an effort to get them back" that provided the motive for the deadly attack in which a total of four Americans, including US Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed.
Mrs Broadwell told the audience: "Now I don't know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner and they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that's still being vetted."
US officials have so far made no reference to the possibility of prisoners being the catalyst for the much criticised bloodshed in Benghazi.
On Sunday, a spokesman for the CIA claimed the suggestion that the agency kept prisoners in Libya was "uninformed and baseless." Mrs Broadwell has come under intense scrutiny since Gen Petraeus submitted his resignation as director of the CIA citing an extramarital affair.
The fitness fanatic, who is married to her husband Scott, a radiologist, has not been seen since news of the scandal broke.
Details of the pair's apparent close relationship have continued to emerge, however, with recent allegations including Gen Petraeus taking her with him on a government-funded trip to Paris in July last year.
On Monday, no one was home at the Broadwell's family residence in an upmarket area of Charlotte, North Carolina.
A spokesman for Charlotte Radiology Breast Centre, where Dr Broadwell works, refused to comment on his whereabouts. He "was not seeing patients today," she added.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#30
Monday, Nov. 12, 2012

FBI agents enter Paula Broadwell's N.C. house

CHARLOTTE, N.C. On Monday night, six FBI agents pulled up to Paula Broadwell's house in three separate cars. Broadwell is the woman named as the past lover of David Petraeus.
The agents were all carrying briefcases, plastic tubs and cardboard boxes as they entered the home. WSOC-TV confirmed that the agents work with the FBI and that they had keys to the home.

The agents also took photographs outside of the house.

WSOC-TV reported that the agents turned on the lights in nearly every room of the house.

No one had been in or out of the house until Monday night, but friends and neighbors said Paula Broadwell had been in touch with them by email. On Monday, neighbors said, Broadwell emailed to say she would be with her family, keeping a low profile.

"She said the family is together and that they're doing ok and that they're at an undisclosed place," said neighbor Ed Williams.

Veteran David Bixle said Broadwell also had a text conversation with him on Monday. He said he saw her two weeks ago during a charity event.

"She's not attempting to defend herself. And it's not because of guilt. It's because she's afraid, like I would be, that anything she says can be twisted and used against her," said Bixler.

WSOC-TV asked what evidence the agents were looking for and what they were there to do, but the agents did not respond.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  MIke Flynn, America's angriest general Tracy Riddle 0 4,043 17-10-2016, 02:34 AM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Effort to draft Marine General for President Tracy Riddle 0 4,549 11-04-2016, 09:23 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  In-Helmet Social Networking: Influential Ex-General’s Vision of Future War Ed Jewett 1 3,115 20-07-2010, 07:59 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  The Runaway General Keith Millea 9 7,002 24-06-2010, 05:50 AM
Last Post: Myra Bronstein
  War Is A Racket by Major General Smedley Butler Magda Hassan 6 27,172 10-06-2010, 05:18 AM
Last Post: Keith Millea
  "War is a Racket"--And no one explains it better than Major General Smedley Butler Myra Bronstein 6 7,033 26-01-2010, 09:37 PM
Last Post: John Bevilaqua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)