Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: Anyone want to discuss HARVEY & LEE?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Kamp is arguing it is a forgery in order to establish two Oswalds. I was simply commenting that all documented forgery of that period was in favor of the Lone Nut official story and was not done by Harvey & Lee types decades before the theory was even known.
Albert Doyle Wrote:Kamp is arguing it is a forgery in order to establish two Oswalds.
Where did I say that?
Just got a copy of the 2/21/1964 Life magazine. You know, this one:

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7325&stc=1]

Here is a photo I took of the full "classroom antics" picture which appears on pages 70-71.

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7326&stc=1]

It isn't as helpful as I'd hoped, but I also made a high-res scan of Oswald's face, which shows the lithographic half-tone dots clearer than anything else.

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7327&stc=1]

A couple of things are pretty clear though. The image that at least seems to show a missing tooth was there at the time Life published it in February 1964, and was not retouched later. And about the backyard photo on that infamous cover....

If "Oswald" didn't purchase or ever possess that rifle, that photo and all the other "backyard photos" are forgeries. John Armstrong destroys the WC case for the rifle here: http://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html
Nice, any chance you can scan the classroom pic at a higher dpi? Like 400?
Thx
I shot the full classroom picture with a 35mm SLR to avoid halftone distortions. The extreme closeup was scanned at 600 dpi, and you see how the halftone dots make the whole thing tough to analyze.
John just emailed Meredith, David and me a new picture of "Marguerite" walking next to Marina.

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7328&stc=1]

Notice how "Marguerite's" feet are slightly higher than Marina's in the perspective. Marina is short. "Marguerite" is REALLY short.
I have met Marina on two occasions.

Marina is about 5' 4". Tops.

So Marguerite has to be maybe 5' 2"?
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:I have met Marina on two occasions.

Marina is about 5' 4". Tops.

So Marguerite has to be maybe 5' 2"?

http://www.icollector.com/Marguerite-Oswald_i17855854

[Image: 17855854_1.jpg?v=8D0A86E037CF630]
[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7337&stc=1]
DL is an interesting find. I notice that Marguerite's signature appears in the wrong place. Most people raised in this country know where to sign official and even commercial documents. In what country would it be normal to place a signature where this one is?

Could be evidence she's not a native of the US.

Also a little strange that Robert doesn't know the name of his own grandfather, or grandmother...